Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Jurisdictional Statement — Turner v. Fouche
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1970
S. 399 (1964) wooo... 2 Baggett v. Bullitt, 877 U. S. 360 (1964) ooo 1) Baxstrom v. Herold, 383 U. S. 107 (1966) 0.00.0. 24 Board of Supervisors v. … Bennett, supra, at 365 VF. 24 712, 713.
396 U.S. 346Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 19, 2020
WELFARE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE (2016) ............................................................17 Anthony Michael Kreis, Policing the Painted and the Powdered, 41 CARDOZA LAW REVIEW 399 … REV. 691 (2003) ...............24 Catherine E.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 19, 2024
C.A.App.222–24. Calk objected vociferously to any such instruction. … Buendia, 907 F.3d 399, 32 402 (6th Cir. 2018).
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Dec 30, 2021
United States, 365 U.S. 399, 412 (1961). … See pp. 24-29, supra.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 2, 2022
App.334 (Tr. 644:17-24). … Milligan Resp. 5, 24, 35; Caster Resp. 5, 7, 25.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James Gimenez, Petitioner v. Franklin County, Washington, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 7, 2023
(Jan. 24, 2020) .............................................24 Shannon Cheng, Democracy Just Got Stronger in Washington State, ACLU (Mar. 20, 2018) ..........23 City Council Staff Report, City of Citrus … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 446 (2006); Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900, 916 (1995)).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 22, 2025
Cal. 1995) ........... 16, 22, 24 Screen Gems-Columbia Music, Inc. v. Mark Fi Records, Inc., 256 F. Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1966) .............. 20–22, 25 Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. … Anthropic PBC, No. 24-cv-03811-EKL, ECF 461 (N.D.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Billy Leon Kearse, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 28, 2026
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986), is antithetical to that process. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 405 (1986)).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kevin Merritt, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 9, 2020
Cir. 2005) ........................................ 24, 25 United States v. Prochner, 417 F.3d 54 (1st Cir. 2005) ...................................... 23, 24 United States v. … Corp., 673 F.3d 399, 405 (5th Cir. 2012)(same); Martin v. Medtronic, Inc., 254 F.3d 573, 577 (5th Cir.2001)(using “unequivocal” the standard); United States v.
Opposition Brief — Neil Aaron Carver, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Dec 17, 2025
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ......................................................... 33 Garza v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 413 (1986) (“‘The fundamental requisite of due process of law is the 32 opportunity to be heard.’”) (citation omitted); Tercero v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Steamship Co. v. Musleh
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 90 S.Ct. 2018 SE nbs ska hk FER SA SEE RAO 13 Wyborski v. Bristo! City Line of Steamship Ltd., 191 ESupp. 884 (D. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 239-40 (1970).
493 U.S. 919Record and brief — California v. Winson
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
(CT 24.) Respondents probation revo- cation hearing began April 13, 1979. (CT 21.) … Green (1970) 399 U.S. 149, and Ohio v.
455 U.S. 975Appellants Reply Brief — Mutual of Omaha Insurance v. Egan
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1980
Everybody = has said it was wrong’’ (RT 901, lines 22-24, 900). And Mr. … National Fire Insurance Company, 25 Cal.2d 399, 154 P.2d 399, 406 squarely nd Se cP LPF EA = PINGTS ‘ec. placed the burden of a fiduciary duty upon insurance com- panies as to its insureds.
445 U.S. 912Supplemental Brief — United States v. City of New Britain
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1954
Supp. 399, 400 (S. D. N. Y. 1934) .. N-7 [2] BLEED THROUGH— POOR COPY [3] Cases :—Continucd Glenn v. … Co., In re, 24 }°. 2d 156 (7th TD hw a V0 0G oh ec bbE Nak act ensececcees Mansfield v. Excelsior Refining Ce., 135 U. S. ae “ais heey Ee + Mellon v.
347 U.S. 81Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · May 27, 2026
Elizabeth B. 399) Presidential Coalition 400) Price, Savannah 401) Price, Shannon 402) Pringle, Rep. … C-24 of 30 App. 360 USCA11 Case: 26-11828 Document: 5-1 Date Filed: 05/27/2026 Page: 26 of 57 Caster v.
Memorandum — Marine Harbor Properties, Inc. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1942
L, Q Rev. 399, 418; | Siegel, Chapter X-or Schackne Act Proceedings? Gee 27.Corn. L. Q. 56. … Rev. 399, 418.
317 U.S. 78Opposition Brief — Wareham Education Ass'n v. Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
Casey, 956 F.2d 399 (3d Cir. 1992) .......0.00.. 9 Hurley v. Irish-American Gay Group, 515 U.S. 557 a a 12 Knight v. Kenai Peninsula Borough Sch. … Casey, 956 F.2d 399, 415 (3d Cir. 1992); Fourth Circuit: Dashiell v. Montgomery Cty., 925 F.2d 750, 756-57 (4th Cir. 1991); Sixth Circuit: Lowary v.
528 U.S. 1062Opposition Brief — Bross v. Derwinski
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
m mbders OI tne gvyenerai WDUODUILIC, 2 | Tran or, 4 a re 1 amon 24 Ya 4 ( Fi U.S.C. 504 note, »60(a)(i) and (2) (Supp. 1987). ha ~ sittpDo Noam nare . tna Yorliesa! … Ass'n, AT9 U.S. 3588, 399 (1987) ). The court found that petitioner’s asserted interest was not within the zone of interests protected by the Act. Pet. App. 17a.
495 U.S. 956Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
State, 29 Ala.App. 399, 197 So. 73, cert. den., 240 Ala. 51, 197 ee ee Ue a ee Oe a ee 13 Silber v. United States, 370 U.S. 717, 82 S.Ct. 1287, 8 Ry ERIS acy Rey Sey = anes ee 18 Stone v. … failing to observe, sua sponte, the obvious inadequacy of petitioner’s counsel which consti- tuted plain error apparent on the record. 6 Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure 10(f) and 10(k) (App. 28&24
452 U.S. 941Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Shapiro v. Shapiro
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1968
Bozarth, 399 Ill. 259, 77 N.E.2d 658... 6 _ Burns v. Burns, 35 Ill.App.2d 34, 181 N.E.2d 605 16, 18 ’ Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252 é&. 14 Douglas v: California, 372 U.S. ‘353 —< 2 Kisler v. … App. ° 13-14) Counsel’s affidavit in support of his sixth motion, made on’Oc- tober 24, 1967, recited that the abstract was being typed for sub- te mission to the printer, that the brief was being
393 U.S. 836
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.