Documents

Oral argument — Martha Romero v. City of Grapevine, Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2018

Velopondo committed what this court calls a manus act, in other words, the act which would precipitate the use of deadly force. … Here, the time period is pretty extensive.

Oral argument — Contango Operators, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2015

And the comment in the Federal Register from 1986 supports Judge Lake's and the bank's court interpretation. … But again, I point out that it wasn't on the charts for 10 months during that dredging period. It wasn't on the charts for 10 months.

Oral argument — Williams v. GoAuto Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2025

All I'm saying is the insurance company received it because they acted on it. Well, they act on it before it's actually even received, unless you go with the email. … I think that this Court's comments in the Jefferson v. Lead Industries case, which was cited in our brief, say it best.

Oral argument — Ntl L & Fire Ins Co v. Riata Cattle Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2022

It's not actually a Motor Carrier Act, and I would note that the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act is also found in Title VII. They're just in different subchapters. … Ochoa was employed for a period of two years and that he was employed directly by RIADA.

Oral argument — United States v. Warren Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2019

Knowingly committing a sex act, they both include the mental and physical impairment aspects. … So those are consequences that lie out there, period. That don't, are keyed and indexed necessarily to the underlying criminal conviction itself. I understand.

Oral argument — Peggy Mays v. Chevron Pipe Line Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2020

The proper test, period. The proper test. The proper test. … Act, or any of its extensions, or the Jones Act.

Oral argument — Rockett Spec Util Dist v. Botkin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2021

And so the question before the Court has now become moot, and I echo Judge Costa's comment of why are we here. … intervening period that's been the concern?

Oral argument — June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. James Cald

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2018

Heron's comment about Justice Alito's comment regarding the record in this case? Your Honor, honestly, I'm not sure I can specifically recall exactly what Justice Alito said. … I think that Justice Breyer commented that there was evidence in this case.

Oral argument — Texas Association v. Bondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2025

A notice and comment is not a straight-up notice and comment. It's an illustration of why it's ultra-virus. Yes, I think that's right. … It wouldn't make sense to have a notice and comment, and it's confidential. Why would you have notice and comment? Yes, exactly.

Oral argument — United States v. Gomez-Santacruz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2022

Guidelines there were 21 to 27, but this court affirmed a 120-month period. Well, do file a letter on that so that opposing counsel can respond. Certainly. … I think that the inarticulate comments could be another version of substantive reasonableness error.

Oral argument — Ivan Webb v. Town of Saint Joseph

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2018

City of Cincinnati, involves a county prosecutor, a one-time act. We have more than a one-time act here. We have a series of actions. … In fact, the closing comments of Judge Roberts, I want you all to go back and look, especially Mr.

Oral argument — Dorothy Slade v. City of Marshall Texas, et

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2015

Huey's comments about that. … So, um, in this case, the, the trial court, uh, and the plaintiffs were using the Texas Wrongful Death Act, uh, and in that act, the, the, it specifically states that liability may only be found when an

Oral argument — Lettuce Entertain You v. Hotel Magdalena

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

Now, our brief details this to a great extent, so I'd like to focus my comments this morning on three digits in particular. … The Lanham Act is not designed to prevent all confusion of all people. It's what's reasonable and probable. Right, but the issue before us is should it go to a jury. Sure.

Oral argument — Mayfield v. LABR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2024

They solicited, they had comments and notice and all that. But here, I'm just asking, what stops the agency for defining it? … Now they've tied the minimum salary rules, so it's going to continue to rise on a periodic basis. The question— Have you all challenged the promulgation of that rule?

Oral argument — United States v. Leonard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2024

The offhand comment when she said that was when they were trying to take care of him. Officer Key first commented on it. She said, yeah, he's high. He's super high. … Entry into the home without a warrant is the chief evil against which the Fourth Amendment is directed, period.

Oral argument — NexPoint Advisors v. Highland Capital Mgmt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2024

It doesn't say that Highland has to act unilaterally. … Would you comment on that? The automatic stay is irrelevant. You could always go to the Court and seek a modification. The automatic stay simply prevents a party from acting unilaterally, okay?

Oral argument — Ernesto Adrian-Favela v. Empire Scaffold, L

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

If I may make two comments. … They had a two-hour wait, Your Honor, from — there was a two-hour time period afterwards as referenced in the Fifth Circuit opinion.

Oral argument — Anthony Ioppolo v. Christopher Rumana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2014

But most importantly, and I mentioned this, there's no act in derogation of its rules in derogation of its own process. … They didn't add any more comments, personal comments about his truthfulness? Well, two things, Judge Davis.

Oral argument — Six Dimensions, Incorporated v. Perficient, Incorp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2020

And in a nutshell, Your Honor, everything in this case relating to the time period that Ms. … First, the accrual for the non-solicitation period was two years.

Oral argument — Franks Investment Co, L.L.C. v. Union Pacific Rail

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2014

Number two, farmers in the area at the time who testified about the use of crossings over the railroad and the use of it for the period of time. … If you go on to read the comments, and I am, I recognize that comments are not the law, but what the comments do is they set forth the law not only predating this current civil code, and not only predating