Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,092 results
0.08s
Oral argument — Intl Gamco v. Multimedia Games
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2007
Do you want to say a few final comments? Yes. Thank you, Judge Rader. I will. Thank you. Mr. O. Good morning. Thank you. May it please the court. With me at council table is Mr. … It's in the state of New York, period. Because the lottery can do business outside the state of New York. And we are still subject to my protections.
30 min of audioOral argument — Dana-Farber Cancer Institute v. Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2020
The key to inventorship is the mental act of conception. … But as to this point, I'm not making a point at all about the statutory one-year grace period or any other grace period for prior art disclosures before the filing of a patent application.
50 min of audioOral argument — CRV ENTERPRISES INC v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2010
I also want to say, there is a regulatory act here. … They did own the property at the time of the regulatory act. And this court has found in Goodrich that records of decision start the statute of limitations period.
33 min of audioOral argument — Laguna Construction Company v. Defense
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2015
Because these are Pueblo Laguna tax invoices for the most part, they would have covered the entire period from 2005 to 2010, the work done in that period. They were just... … Claims Act or whatever.
72 min of audioOral argument — Nike Inc v. Dixon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2006
Because the comments of Ms. Maxim, who was the interface, reflect what she is relating the policy is. I can direct the court to that part of her testimony and affidavit. … The case law is consistent, and most of the courts who've adopted the Uniform Trade Secret Act, including Oregon, have uniform interpretation provisions.
34 min of audioOral argument — Jenkins v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2023
So there's constructive notice that he has made comments during certain proceedings that he was aware that he needed to go reclaim his vehicles. … And then- The contention is you didn't ask the civil court to take judicial notice of those comments. You're right, Your Honor.
31 min of audioOral argument — Llantada v. OPM
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2008
And as OPM states in its brief at page 4, there is a presumption that administrative actions are correct and that government officials act in good faith in discharging their duties. … Sort of in a blank space for added comments. Well, an explanation as to why the action is taken. So what I urge on the court is it is presumptively valid.
24 min of audioOral argument — Benjamin v. Agriculture
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2008
And Charge 2, as you've indicated, was reputed acts of disrespectful conduct towards the supervisor. … Benjamin should have been aware that there were a lot of concerns over her performance over a period of time.
23 min of audioOral argument — RIGGINS v. HHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2010
Now, I appreciate your comments about the Stevens case, but the special master certainly did take that into account. … Geier was acting as a consultant but not an expert, correct? That's true. That's what the special master said was appropriate.
37 min of audioOral argument — Keller v. MSPB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009
What remedy, other than being paid for the period of the suspension, is the employee entitled to? … an involuntary act on her own.
29 min of audioOral argument — UCP International Company Ltd. v. Balsam Brands Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2019
I believe it made its way into this case because it was attached to either the complaint or the amended complaint here in the Territory Judgment Act case. … So Arizona did not need to state the broad principle drawn from comment.
70 min of audioOral argument — CCA ASSOCIATES v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2011
because Siena-Gaten allowed for two different tests, one that was based on market value at the time of the regulation, and then a separate one which seems to be based on a return-based approach, and your comment … The legislative history is clear that the HOPE Act was enacted because the benefits being provided under the preservation statutes were costing too much.
54 min of audioOral argument — Four Rivers Investment v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2009
So how is the letter encouraging you to wait later than the period required for making such a protest? … Brokamp, the Supreme Court, said four times in the statute it gave notice of the specific time periods required, and that was the notice.
26 min of audioOral argument — ESSO Standard Oil v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2008
regulation for other official action that would give rise to a legal practice Well, in conjunction with the 1988 amendments, I would say it is akin to a Customs regulation, although there's no notice of comment … and over and over again And if ESSA's argument is that it delegated its duty to determine what its legal obligations were To a software program That does not excuse it from meeting the 90-day protest period
37 min of audioOral argument — Koninklijke Philips N v. v. Zoll Medical Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2015
So, some of the self-test claims relate to using either a first periodic schedule or a second periodic schedule. You can choose one, you can choose the other. … Well, there's one other problem that we pointed out in our papers, which is that contributory infringement requires acts, predicate acts, of direct infringement.
35 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2007
And we've already agreed as to what the state of the law was at the relevant time period. … No one was on notice of that policy by APA, notice and comment. There was no regulation promulgated that said that the board would have authority.
22 min of audioOral argument — Electra-Med Corporation v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2019
And the supply contracts that the distributors have entered into, do those go beyond that six-month period? I believe they end right at that six-month period as well. … Do you have one final comment on that?
44 min of audioOral argument — Finjan v. Secure Computing
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2010
system, a mini-internet, and they went through all of the method claims first, and in fact, they labeled the elements A, B, C, and D, and they went through and they showed the jury, and you'll see the comments … And then proved that up because it awarded an accounting for a different period of time right before the verdict.
45 min of audioOral argument — Rex Service Corp v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2006
The DOD was going to be buying these parts, a minimum of 3,500 parts over a three-year period. … Well, if I may just comment on that, and maybe no one ever thought of this, I certainly haven't seen any of it in this record.
31 min of audioOral argument — Lee's Ford Dock, Inc. v. Secretary of the Army
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2017
As Your Honor would also note, there was a comment in that decision that said, since this is a lease, that the board did in fact have CDA jurisdiction on that basis as well. … So we would say that it started running in 2007 when the court announced that it would be lowering the reservoir level for an extended period of time.
55 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.