Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.92s
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 29, 2008
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
73 FR 5101Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 31, 1997
This action is taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (the Act) as amended in 1990. … The plan was not submitted under the National Highway System Designation Act, which amended the Clean Air Act I/M requirement in certain respects.
62 FR 41002Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 31, 2007
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
72 FR 74250Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 23, 2020
The comments submitted by the Clean Air Council included comments that were originally submitted to ACHD in response to ACHD's proposal of the Allegheny Area attainment plan, which the Clean Air Council … Comment 2: The commenter states that under the Clean Air Act, the NAAQS “compliance” deadline for this area was October 4, 2018, and that it is unclear how the SIP can meet the past compliance deadline
85 FR 22593Environmental Protection AgencyMattel, Inc.; Proposed Consent Agreement With Analysis To Aid Public Comment
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 14, 1995
Air Act Amendments of 1960, Pub. … Under the Clean Air Act Amendments, the EPA has authority to add new chemicals to the Class I and Class II lists.
60 FR 19068Federal Trade CommissionApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 13, 1996
Section 182(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) requires all moderate and above ozone nonattainment areas to achieve a 15% reduction of 1990 emissions of VOC (VOM) by 1996. … The Clean Air Act forbids USEPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. USEPA., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
61 FR 5511Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 15, 2003
EPA is approving this revision to the State of Maryland SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 1972Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Missouri; Construction Permit Exemptions
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 26, 2022
The EPA's proposed approval of this rule revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 27, 2022. … EPA proposes to find that these revisions meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act, do not impact the stringency of the SIP, and do not adversely impact air quality.
87 FR 31966Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Washington
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 23, 1995
The SIP revision was submitted by the State to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements for Section 187(a)(2)(A) and Section 187(a)(3) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by September 22, 1995.
60 FR 43737Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 21, 1998
Clean Air Act Proposal 3. Clean Water Act Federal Register Notice of Availability E. Discussion of Final Clean Air Act Rule Published Elsewhere in Today's Federal Register F. … Emission standard promulgated that has been or will be promulgated under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act for hazardous air pollutants listed in section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act.
63 FR 50388Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Oregon
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 19, 1995
2 (The Federal Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan and other State Regulations). … The SIP revision was submitted to address section 110(a)(2)(E) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA).
60 FR 37013Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Illinois
Federal Register · Rule · May 19, 1998
This plan was submitted to meet the Clean Air Act (Act) requirement for States to adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) rules for sources that are covered by Control Techniques Guideline … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. EPA., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
63 FR 27489Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Nov 3, 2023
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS … As amended, 5 U.S.C. app. section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, as appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six
88 FR 75588Environmental Protection AgencyPetitioners Brief — Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1983
Although the Clean Air Act is silent concerning oral com- munications after the close of the comment period, the court of appeals’ ruling established important restrictions on such eon ‘nications. … As one commentator observed: “(T]he court elaborated at great length on the often puzzling requirements of section 307 of the Clean Air Act, with the result that those involved in Clean Air Act rulemakings
463 U.S. 680Federal Register · Rule · Jan 2, 2001
With regard to the comment that EPA has an independent obligation to determine whether the control strategies for each source meet the Clean Air Act's requirements. … Air Act.
66 FR 8Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 21, 2018
The commenters contend that the EPA's interpretation is inconsistent with the Clean Air Act for various reasons. … Quality Standards under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
83 FR 65878Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 17, 1996
A second public comment period will not be held. Parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. … This rule has been approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as meeting the RACT requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act).
61 FR 37216Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 10, 2017
” • The initials CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air Act. • The words EPA, we, us, or our mean or refer to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. … quality benefits for each affected NAAQS. 34 33 See “Demonstrating Noninterference Under Section 110( l ) of the Clean Air Act When Revising a State Implementation Plan,” 6, 10-11
82 FR 46903Environmental Protection AgencyLegal Consequences of EPA’s Endangerment Finding for New Motor Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Dec 15, 2009
For Clean Air Policy, A Pragmatic Approach to Regulating Greenhouse Gases Under the Clean Air Act 14 (2009), http://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/614/ Clean%20Air%20Act%20and%20GHGs_CCAP_March%202009.pdf … The question of NEPA’s application to EPA was resolved, to some extent, by amendments to the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act expressly exempting the agency from NEPA’s impact statement requirement.
R40984Congressional Research ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Jul 31, 2012
EPA is approving the 2005 emissions inventories for the Milwaukee-Racine and Sheboygan areas as meeting the comprehensive emissions inventory requirement of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 45252Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.