Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 20, 2017
Infrastructure SIPs address the applicable requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110, which requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of … A detailed Technical Support Document (TSD) is included in this rulemaking docket to address the following: A description of Clean Air Act section 110(a)(1) and (2) infrastructure SIPs; the applicable
82 FR 43925Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 11, 2002
Duty Diesel Engines (HDDE's) pursuant to section 177 of the Federal Clean Air Act (Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 45909Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 8, 2010
The comment period on the proposal ended on August 30, 2010, and we did not receive any comments. III. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 68447Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 8, 2019
First, the EPA is repealing the Clean Power Plan (CPP) because the Agency has determined that the CPP exceeded the EPA's statutory authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA). … These emission guidelines are developed in accordance with section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act and subpart Ba of this part.
84 FR 32520Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 29, 1998
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: This final rule is effective August 28, 1998 unless the Agency receives adverse comment by July 29, 1998. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
63 FR 35145Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 21, 2019
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
84 FR 10433Environmental Protection AgencyTribal code · Tribal code
The requirements of the Clean Air Act Title V, Part 70 Permitting Program (Program) have been incorporated at Article II, Part 1 of the Reservation Air Code. … the new source performance standards (NSPS) and national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) under Sections 111 and 112 of the Clean Air Act, respectively (78 FR 40635).
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Sulfur Content Limitations for Fuels
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 8, 2021
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 10, 2021. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
86 FR 8566Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 20, 2001
EPA is approving these revisions to establish RACT requirements in the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Air Act.
66 FR 43492Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 13, 1996
Section 182(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) requires all moderate and above ozone nonattainment areas to achieve a 15% reduction of 1990 emissions of VOC (VOM) by 1996. … The Clean Air Act forbids USEPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. USEPA., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
61 FR 5511Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Nov 5, 2002
The NAAMS Subcommittee will report to the Administrator of EPA through the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, a Federal advisory committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA … A public comment period on the proposed regulations will be announced at a later date by EPA's Office of Air and Radiation.
67 FR 67403Environmental Protection AgencyProject XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for Weyerhaeuser Company Flint River Operations
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 27, 2001
The main purposes of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “the Act”) are to protect and enhance the quality of our Nation's air resources, and to promote the public health and welfare and the productive capacity … Executive Order 12866 also encourages agencies to provide a meaningful public comment period, and suggests that in most cases the comment period should be 60 days.
66 FR 34119Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 18, 1999
The intended effect of approving these rules is to regulate emergency preparedness in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … Background The Clean Air Act of 1970 (42 USC s. 7401 et seq.; CAA or the Act) required states to develop plans to prevent and [[Page 13352]] control air quality from degrading to the level of significant
64 FR 13351Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 15, 2016
quality standard in the San Joaquin Valley, California ozone nonattainment area and to meet other Clean Air Act requirements. … Under section 109 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA promulgates national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or standards) for pervasive air pollutants, such as ozone.
81 FR 2140Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for Alaska
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 21, 2010
of the corresponding onshore area (“COA”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (“the Act”). … Administrative Requirements Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to establish requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources located within 25 miles of States' seaward boundaries
75 FR 3392Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 3, 2009
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to delete certain statutes and rules that were erroneously approved by EPA under the Clean Air Act as part of the Arizona and Nevada state implementation plans. … EPA is proposing to delete these statutes and rules under section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act.
74 FR 57055Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 6, 2011
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
76 FR 62002Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 4, 2012
We proposed to approve CARB's regulations under section 110(k)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”). … Public Comments and EPA Responses Our July 11, 2011 proposed rule provided a 30-day comment period.
77 FR 20308Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 25, 2021
This determination is based upon monitored air quality data for the PM 10 NAAQS during the years 2014 through 2018. The EPA is taking this action pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
86 FR 33547Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 17, 2002
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
67 FR 46948Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.