Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.68s
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 8, 2003
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established … Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.”
68 FR 58019Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 15, 2000
Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
65 FR 68898Environmental Protection AgencyMaintenance Plan and Redesignation Request for the Ajo PM10 Planning Area; Arizona
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 4, 2020
The EPA is proposing these actions because the SIP revision meets the applicable requirements under the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”) for maintenance plans and because the State has met the requirements … The Area Must Show the Improvement in Air Quality Is Due to Permanent and Enforceable Emission Reductions D. The Area Must Have a Fully Approved Maintenance Plan Under Clean Air Act Section 175A V.
85 FR 34381Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 16, 2020
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
85 FR 57714Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 13, 1998
Under provisions of sections 182, 184, and 187 of the Clean Air Act (Act), New Jersey is required to implement an enhanced I/M program throughout the entire State. … SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing.
63 FR 26562Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions for Primary Lead Processing
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 15, 2011
Changes to the Risk Assessment Performed Under Section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act B. Changes to the Technology Review Performed Under Section 112(d)(6) of the Clean Air Act C. … is not a hazardous air pollutant) as provided under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112(b)(7)). 1 USEPA.
76 FR 70834Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Sulfur Content Limitations for Fuels
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 8, 2021
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 10, 2021. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
86 FR 8566Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 11, 2002
Duty Diesel Engines (HDDE's) pursuant to section 177 of the Federal Clean Air Act (Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 45909Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 13, 2007
First, the International Paper innovation project required an alternative regulatory approach under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 45165Environmental Protection AgencyOral argument — Sierra v. USArmy Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
That's the revenue under the Clean Water Act. What is planned to be built on the 1.5 acres? … The only—what was before, the state—the acting Army Corps of Engineers, when the public comment period closed, was only an analysis of the traffic on the site.
36 min of audioApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona; Nogales PM10 Nonattainment Area Plan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 27, 2012
Clean Air Act Plan Requirements for Moderate PM 10 Nonattainment Areas II. … Clean Air Act Provisions and EPA Guidance Concerning International Border Areas 1. Section 179B of the Clean Air Act 2. The 1994 General Preamble Addendum 3.
77 FR 38400Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Jun 19, 2002
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL-7234-1] EPA Science Advisory Board Notification of Public Advisory Committee Meetings of the SAB Executive Committee and Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee … Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)—July 18-19, 2002 The Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) of the US EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) will meet on Thursday July 18 and Friday
67 FR 41722Environmental Protection AgencyJoint Appendix — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Dec 13, 2021
Air Act Amendments of 1970,” § 4, 84 Stat, at 1684. 226 “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970,” § 4, 84 Stat, at 1685. 227 “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970,” § 4, 84 Stat, at 1685. 228 H.R. … See “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” § 108, 104 Stat. 2467. 261 “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” § 403, 104 Stat, at 2631. 262 “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” § 301, 104 Stat, at 2631. 460
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 1, 2011
Section V discusses EPA's action to delete the Site from the NPL unless adverse comments are received during the public comment period. II. … The newspaper notice announces the 30-day public comment period concerning the Notice of Intent to Delete the Site from the NPL.
76 FR 18066Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 19, 2025
Air Car Service & Parking Branch Two, LLC (“Clean Air Two”), over the objection of Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Three (“Clean Air Three”). … between the Clean Air 2 Debtor and the Clean Air 2 Buyer.
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 31, 1998
The intended effect of approving this rule is to regulate emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 62 FR 18730.
63 FR 40828Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · May 27, 2014
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409D(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS and recommend … Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA requires that the Agency periodically review and revise, as appropriate, the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants, including oxides of sulfur
79 FR 30137Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 31, 2007
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
72 FR 74250Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Oct 20, 2008
on clean air efforts. … provisions of the Clean Air Act. 7 7 42 U.S.C. 7506 Section 176(c).
73 FR 62362Transportation DepartmentFederal Highway AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Apr 23, 2020
The comments submitted by the Clean Air Council included comments that were originally submitted to ACHD in response to ACHD's proposal of the Allegheny Area attainment plan, which the Clean Air Council … Comment 2: The commenter states that under the Clean Air Act, the NAAQS “compliance” deadline for this area was October 4, 2018, and that it is unclear how the SIP can meet the past compliance deadline
85 FR 22593Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.