Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.76s
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Construction Permit Fees
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 29, 2012
The repeal and replace and SIP revisions included in this action would address section 110(a)(2) Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA) requirements related to fees for reviewing and acting on specific air quality … EPA has determined that these SIP revisions comply with the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations and are consistent with EPA policies. This action is being taken under section 110 of the Act.
77 FR 18990Environmental Protection AgencyRegulatory Guidance Letters Issued by the Corps of Engineers
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 18, 1996
Air Act. 1. … Air Act.
61 FR 30990Defense DepartmentEngineers CorpsFederal Register · Rule · Oct 30, 2025
As a result of this action, Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”) section 172(c)(9) contingency measures for failure to attain the 2015 ozone NAAQS and contingency measures for failure to make reasonable further … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period that ended on July 3, 2025. During this period, no comments were received. III.
90 FR 48820Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 2, 1999
This proposed rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 5015Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Connecticut; 1997 8-Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 25, 2018
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 25, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
83 FR 24259Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 11, 1998
Background On December 19, 1995, pursuant to sections 111 and 129 of the Clean Air Act (Act), the EPA promulgated new source performance standards (NSPS) applicable to new MWCs and EG applicable to … State Plan approvals under section 111(d) and section 129(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements on any entity affected by this rule, including small entities.
63 FR 68394Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 3, 2015
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 67642Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 2, 2003
In reviewing 111(d)/129 plan submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
68 FR 53Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 2, 2000
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 112(l) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA), the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MC) in Arizona requested delegation of specific national emission standards … Authority: This action is issued under the authority of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412. Dated: February 18, 2000. David P.
65 FR 11278Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 28, 1999
ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 112(l) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA), the Pima County Department of Environmental … Authority: This action is issued under the authority of section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412. Dated: June 10, 1999. David P. Howekamp, Director, Air Division, Region IX.
64 FR 34627Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; OR; Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Period
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 8, 2024
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02 … factors identified in § 7491(g)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
89 FR 81361Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Wisconsin
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 23, 1997
During the 30 day public comment period for this final rule, EPA received adverse comments from a private party, who took the position that EPA should redesignate Manitowoc County to attainment. II. … SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing.
62 FR 39446Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 27, 2015
This action is in accordance with the federal Clean Air Act (the Act, CAA). DATES: This rule will be effective on April 27, 2015. … Public Comments The public comment period for the January 21, 2015 (80 FR 2846) proposal expired on February 20, 2015, and we did not receive any comments on the proposed actions during this period.
80 FR 16291Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations; Consistency Update for California
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 22, 2006
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (“the Act”). … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed actions provided 30-day public comment periods. During these periods, we received no comments on the proposed actions.
71 FR 35804Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 1, 2016
Air Act (CAA or Act) section 172(c)(1) and incorporate it into the SIP; (2) to approve the base year emissions inventory for the 2010 1-hour SO 2 NAAQS for the Kentucky portion of the Area pursuant … Ambient air quality monitoring data for the 3-year period must meet a data completeness requirement.
81 FR 86664Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 26, 1998
Air Act requirements. … Air Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. 7410(k).
63 FR 45399Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 27, 2000
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) in Title III of the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990. … Clean Water Act .
65 FR 81964Environmental Protection AgencyReview of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Oxides
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 18, 2019
Reviews of the NAAQS are required by the Clean Air Act (CAA) on a periodic basis. The last review of the primary SO 2 NAAQS was completed in 2010 (75 FR 35520, June 22, 2010). … Legislative Requirements Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS.
84 FR 9866Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 3, 2019
For an area classified as Moderate under the Clean Air Act (CAA), such as the West Central Pinal County PM 2.5 nonattainment area, section 188(c) provides that the statutory attainment date is “as expeditiously … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 2, 2019.
84 FR 52766Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 30, 2003
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
68 FR 61782Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.