Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.29s
Oral argument — Ryan Widmer v. Jossette Okereke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024
Air Force. But he didn't know, the chief didn't know that the man allegedly had not been in that position. … But at some point in that period of time, he did obtain an OPADA certification. He obtained the education necessary to become a police officer.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Schwatze Robles-Amaro
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2014
We can have comment about that, I guess. Did she take any precautions to safeguard any privacy interests she may have in the car? The precaution was that he was returning it to her. … It may be more invasive to stop a car and then let the air out of the tires, but stopping the car is a seizure all the same.
28 min of audioOral argument — Center for Biological Diversity v. Lee Zeldin
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2025
Well, the Clean Water Act does require that EPA solicit and review comments from the Fish and Wildlife Service. And it does require that EPA ensure that any state... … Fish and Wildlife Service can comment at that time. Fish and Wildlife Service can also comment during the public notice period. And Fish and Wildlife Service can comment through EPA.
76 min of audioOral argument — Osvaldo Figueroa v. Butterball, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025
With respect to the rate on the top of the pay stub, that is a fixed rate that for a period of time Mr. … Mount Air Farms that pre-shift and post-shift activities, when they are integral and indispensable to the principal activities, are compensable time.
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Wilson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017
But there was a separate criminal indictment that covered the alchemy scheme, which included false statements under the Clean Air Act and violations of other related laws regarding the government incentives … Well, if this plant would have produced the volume that it claimed that it produced, it would have been 4% of the biodiesel production in the United States during the time period.
18 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Theodore Norris
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2009
Well, because I don't think it was cleaned up for the jury. I don't think the jury understood there was no limit. Well, cleaned up, you know. Provided that. … Anderson that he had acted in self-defense was two weeks. In this Court's case in Opplinger, the pre-arrest silence that is commented upon is silence when Mr.
21 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Michaelis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2018
If he took that care here, he would have determined that while the defendant's criminal history was significant, it was condensed to a particular period of time. He'd been clean for two years. … And that's where the plein air is. But I've got a real problem on the third problem. Right.
21 min of audioOral argument — United States v. David Hopkins
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021
we're talking about preservation of air, doesn't and shouldn't have to be all that significant. … That one strikes me as such an obvious and clean error that it ought to be structural. It's not our case. This one here is presented in a much more subtle way.
24 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gary Wilson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025
And can I add one more comment? … The last thing I would say is look to the verbiage of the statute, and that's how the air becomes as clear here as any other plain air case where people have gotten relief.
26 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Clements
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2003
First of all, it's inapplicable because it was a Youth Corrections Act case. It was a juvenile case. … So perhaps you could comment on what the prejudice is. Certainly, Your Honor. I'll skip down to that. That was my final point.
22 min of audioOral argument — Alaska Community Action on Tox v. Aurora Energy Services, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2014
There is coal, but coal is a defined pollutant under the Clean Water Act, and it's falling into waters of the U.S. … Importantly, the Clean Water Act prohibits discharges of pollutants, and I don't think that's at issue here.
44 min of audioOral argument — Jose Zumel v. Loretta E. Lynch
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2015
It was granted amnesty for acts constituting rebellion, coup d'etat committed during the period of 1986 to 1994. So that's the whole 6-year period. That's correct, Your Honor. … We're dealing with a Philippine Air Force general who participated, obviously, in a coup attempt with others over 20 years ago, for which acts he has now been given total amnesty by the Philippine government
34 min of audioOral argument — Midwest REM Enterprises v. Noonon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2015
She also provided her comments on the record because she had a full record before her. And her comments were to encourage the plaintiffs to look at the lack of merit of their case. … I know you're busy today so I'll just make one brief comment regarding the SLAPP Act. We're never too busy for good arguments.
30 min of audioOral argument — Washington State Dairy Fed. v. USEPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021
The rationale, looking at the Clean Water Act in the Chevron case, is the same basic theory. Excuse me, I didn't mean to interrupt you. … This is the jurisdictional section of the Safe Drinking Water Act. That being the case, this 45-day period is jurisdictional.
41 min of audioOral argument — Allegiant Air, LLC v. Intl. Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023
They have even imported and agreed to the NMB, which is the additional step under Railway Labor Act. … of what would be a normal grievance filing period.
24 min of audioOral argument — Jorge Rojas v. FAA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2020
In cleanness, the Supreme Court says that there are two separate inquiries that government has to satisfy in order to invoke Exemption 5. The first is that the document is inter- or intra-agency. … There are Federal Records Act requirements on documents that have to remain within the agency.
69 min of audioOral argument — Canyon Ferry Road v. Stumberg
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2008
Well, you think this whole movement went on just in the air without individuals being supported for office? … I would tell them to report at least the $75 cleaning fee. There is a $75 cleaning fee that anyone else who used the church for this space would have to. When does the cleaning fee come in?
54 min of audioOral argument — Aaberg v. Aaberg
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019
But in this case, it's just simply more expenses that the plaintiff had never paid, which raises another issue, clean hands. … In fact, the judge ordered him to pay $16,000, I think, within a short period of time.
35 min of audioOral argument — Exendine v. Sammamish City of
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2008
And also in Penman, I believe there was a question of fact as to whether or not the building authorities were acting under pretext, merely because they're trying to clean up this area. … These folks were aware that the city was trying to get these codes cleaned up – code violations cleaned up, rather. They gave them lots of notice.
24 min of audioOral argument — UC Regents v. USDHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018
for two-year periods. … And I think that's where we would get to Montana AIR.
74 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.