Documents

Oral argument — Surrell v. CA Water Service Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007

that they're talking about, there's a 60-day deferral period before the EEOC acts, unless the state first acts by giving you a right-to-sue letter. … I'll make a brief comment on the mental disability issue.

Oral argument — Recreational Developments v. City of Phoenix

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2003

Constitution guarantees the right to offer a live sex act for entertainment. … And so no matter what Gould and Scherzer say, they're still stuck with the fact that they don't have a right of privacy that protects the operation of a live sex act business offering live sex acts as

Oral argument — APAC v. BPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2013

, but a period after 2028, equal to $2,050,000,000, $2.05 billion. … They didn't just pick it out of the air. Well, it's not just picked out of the air, but the point is you can't start with the rep benefit and work backwards because it's...

Oral argument — Luxton v. Washington State Department of Veterans Affairs

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2026

David Luxton, who's also a major in the Air Guard and the Civil Air Patrol. … Well, you act as if the July version might not be the, I mean, isn't that what we looked at? Well, we're talking about reasonable accommodations too, your honor. Okay.

Oral argument — United States v. Wendell Kopp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011

On a plein air review or even not plein air review, what would be the basis for having such a withdrawal instruction? I mean, what is the factual basis? … Do you have a comment on that?

Oral argument — Western Towboat Company v. Vigor Marine, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2023

of a loss on yours they'd have to be like like it would only be pollution and liability damage say to the tow from the like the towboats like sprays oil all over and then they're like well you got to clean … proposed judgment or after he entered the judgment never went back to the pre-judgment interest is of course within the discretion of the trial court judge and that that date is not picked out of thin air

Oral argument — National Family Farm Coalition v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2018

I'll be addressing EPA's violations of the Endangered Species Act, Section 7A2. I'd like to try and touch on three points. … The states have come forward as well, Your Honor, with lots of other reasons for the incidents, including failure to clean the tanks, misuse of the instructions, et cetera, et cetera.

Oral argument — Shannon Saevik v. Swedish Medical Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2022

Some of those, those comments, and then also the comment that she'd been habitually problematic and a drain on resources. … I mean, those, the comments are what they are. Right.

Oral argument — United States v. William Veronin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2022

equipped to deal with his mental health conditions and advocated that he be turned out and Judge Hatter expressly stated you know I'm going to I'm going to give this one more try because I think we we are acting … disentitlement doctrine in this context where the court is effectively having to make fact findings in the first instance about mr vernon's mental state where he is um is highly problematic it's just not a clean

Oral argument — Paul Donohoe v. USFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2023

And I think this court's decision in Marina Point, which is about the Clean Water Act, but a similar notice provision, is helpful in that it says a notice has to let the target know what it actually says … They're not foreclosed to, but actually, based on what they said during that comment period, we moved it as far from their property as practical.

Oral argument — Laura Leigh v. Sally Jewell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2013

But there is a public comment period in that. Why doesn't it become moot for this particular roundup? Well, I do think that the two exceptions do apply here. … period.

Oral argument — Kattra v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2008

In addition, he was eligible for the Life Act, which provides him every available option to adjust his status under the Immigration Naturalization Act. … Can I make one personal comment, Your Honor? Certainly. On behalf of all of us out here, I was admitted. These young lawyers have been treated very nicely in this Court.

Oral argument — Johnson v. Boys, Girls Club

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2006

The racial discrimination is in, you know, comments by Mr. … The comments by Mr. Anderson don't actually show a discriminatory animus.

Oral argument — Servicios Aereos v. Honeywell Intl Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2007

Because I think if Honeywell had cut them off right there, it could have stood on a pretty clean record. But it didn't stop there. … And, in fact, we did, she didn't think we did, and so she suggested the acts.

Oral argument — United States v. Rider

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2007

I remember a period when double jeopardy was interpreted differently in Alaska law. I don't know if it was national. … Sook, would agree that in these cases, as a general matter, there's a full airing of all of the conduct.

Oral argument — Ancala Holdings v. Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2006

In other words, if I go into the country club today with guests and I sit down in the restaurant and I get really bad service and I see a cockroach running along the baseboard and I comment to my companions … I come back, the service is good, the restaurant is clean, the food's terrific. But the record doesn't support that. Well, it supports that in 1994 we had this complaint.

Oral argument — Servicios v. Honeywell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2007

And Judge Clifton, your comment was correctly read. This was money that was already over 60 days due and owing. And he laid out, Mr. … She didn't think we did, and so she suggested the acts.

Oral argument — Whistler Investments v. The Depository Trust

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2008

As Judge Thomas wrote in the air conditioning case, we look at the structure and the purpose of the statute as a whole. As a whole. … The commission's disagreement with those facts is irrelevant in this context, period.

Oral argument — Consumer Financial Protection v. Seila Law LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2020

You just commented on the Ninth Circuit case of Gordon, which dealt with the appointments caused defect. But that case also relied on the D.C. … The clean tell is ultimately dismissed.

Oral argument — Dev Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2018

It spoke in the Railway Labor Act, the Airline Deregulation Act, and the FQAA. By the way, I'm sorry to interrupt. Are your clients covered by a CBA? … The essential component of the job of flight attendant is in the air. It is to provide safety support and passenger support in the air. That is the nature of the job.