Documents

Oral argument — Robyn Bomar v. Board of Education of Harford County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2025

And there were four more assistants during that period that were appointed from the pool. If the candidate didn't succeed the first time, then you could be in the pool, right? Yes, correct. … This Court found in Wanamaker that she established pretexts upon which a jury could reasonably find that her acting supervisor harbored discriminatory animus towards her, built a case against her based

Oral argument — United States v. Catherine Chollet

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026

And I appreciate the court's comments. … It says venue may, essential acts may have happened, but where was the criminal act done?

Oral argument — Certain Underwriters v. Max Cohen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2015

the policy he cannot collect any benefits what he can collect he can suffer the injury and that's what this policy ensures against is the injury that would prevent you from doing from performing the act … Frey made some comments about Thomas Peterson he was not an insignificant player in the role here and Peterson International was not an insignificant entity here Mr.

Oral argument — General Assurance of America v. Overby-Seawell Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2013

Capital City Bank remained a customer at least throughout the period of discovery leading up to the trial here. … Now, I do also want to touch briefly on a comment that Your Honor made regarding whether or not you can even bring these tort claims under any law.

Oral argument — Samuel Muriithi v. Shuttle Express, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2013

I wish to continue to reserve a few moments for rebuttal and I'll try to be brief in my opening comments. … Singleton indicated would be due, that's tens of thousands, if not $100,000, with double damages over a three-year period.

Oral argument — Michael Driggs v. CIA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2026

The court commented on that. That's the way we look at it. Another factor is judicial economy. We're only asking that the court review the redacted portions of just 29 pages. … And also, the plaintiffs argue that the—about a provision of the CIA Act, which is an exception to the ordinary circumstance where the CIA does not have to search its operational records, period.

Oral argument — Jennifer Clodfelter v. Republic of Sudan

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

No, but there's a time period within which to file a related action under 1083 C3. Right, and we filed a motion to request relinquishment in this court so that we could do that. … In other words, the cause of action under 1605A, the elements are that an act of terrorism caused the death. Under the Death on the High Seas Act, it would be a different claim.

Oral argument — United States v. Anthony Wynn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2015

And so because of that, it couldn't serve as a predicate to enhance his maximum penalty on the Controlled Substances Act. And so again they're looking backwards. What was that conviction? … I'll make that comment for you, but it's not your obligation to resolve it. Thank you, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Jorge P. Cornell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2015

You know, there was the check-kiting scheme that was the basis for the bank-kiting, I mean, the bank fraud predicate acts involved like $1,200 or $2,000 over a one-week period of time. … The check-kiting scheme involved a one-week period of time that involved about $2,000. Are you saying that's de minimis? Yes, sir. I'm saying that's de minimis.

Oral argument — Billy Prince v. Sears Holdings Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016

I think the last comments that Mr. Taylor made really tell us why we're here today. It's true that Mr. Prince does not want ERISA to preempt his claims. … In this case, we do have that time period of six, eight months where the error was caught and Sears attempted to rectify that error by allowing Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Nelson Evans

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2025

The government really finds their support and their tie-in on these very transitory comments that are made on the intercepted calls between Jackson and Simpson, where Jackson is talking about various people … not constitute an overt act.

Oral argument — Michael Walker v. B. Donahoe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2021

wearing a black shirt and camouflage pants um leaveless shirt in west virginia in the beginning of february uh district court though didn't seem to make any uh any particular note of that did it didn't comment … know mr ryan i haven't heard you say anything during your whole presentation about the fact that this all started with a 911 call from a concerned citizen can't that be uh something that the officer is acting

Oral argument — Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust v. Merck & Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021

Now, there is a lot of side comments as to the way people try to construe it or attempt to construe it. … And that's why I think that the district court was acting well within its discretion to be able to be saying, no, it's going to be completely impractical if we're trying to have 32 more plaintiffs joined

Oral argument — United States v. Samuel Pratt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2018

Even considering that, you know, it's a comment. And it's maybe one factor. Maybe it's one factor. If you do consider it. I believe... … So the government has to act with some dispatch here.

Oral argument — United States v. Demetrice Devine

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2022

And as I say, on the drug charge, the basic argument is just sporadic sales over a long period of time. It really was not part of the RICO conspiracy or the enterprise. … Thank you for those comments, your honor. We appreciate being invited up.

Oral argument — Nicholas Jones v. Timothy Gross

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016

And he made some colorful comments about how quick he was running and I can certainly highlight that in my rebuttal and pull it from the record. … They were acting as agents for each other.

Oral argument — United States v. Abel Rangel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2014

And seemed to have made it pretty clear in commenting about this particular defendant that, as I believe he said, none of the factors that he looked at of the 3553A factors weighed in his favor. … Rangel's acts actually only cover a span of eight months, from August of 1992 to April of 1993.

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Fulton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2024

And we have cases that say directly that the meaning under 820 and G1 is a question of law, period. Yes, and even so, Your Honor, there was nothing before this jury. … And Burroughs I think speaks to a wariness on the part of this court or even a district court acting after a jury verdict to supplant what they...

Oral argument — Ross Abbott v. Harris Pastides

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2018

Perhaps the questions were asked to establish the context of what occurred, including the behavior and the comments? Well, that's right. … Are you conceding that at least sort of in the time period right after the letter arrives and until the meeting or maybe the final disposition of this matter, that for some time period there, you know,

Oral argument — Thomas Francis v. Allstate Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2013

Towers had been performing acts of molestation or coming close to acts of molestation upon him. … The California case law is clear, because I heard numerous comments, when we look at the pleadings, we look at the pleadings.