Documents

Oral argument — Leslie Sun v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Cmsnr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2015

May it please the Court, my name is Eric Poole and I represent Carolyn Colvin, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. We intend to briefly cover two issues today. … Krause bolstered the evidence from April 11, that includes the comment about having been bearing weight in the walking boot. So the Commissioner's contention is that the record reveals that Ms.

Oral argument — Anthony Minnis v. Board of Supervisors of LA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2015

There are no comparable acts after 2011 to acts that occurred in pre-2011 time frame. … Judge Jackson did not look at because of his view of the limitation period.

Oral argument — Lisa M. v. Leander Independent Sch Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2019

What explanation do you have for why that change was so stark in just a month's time period? … He reviewed the fact that the hearing officer considered the teacher's testimony and their comments.

Oral argument — United States v. Morton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2021

And if he gets it wrong, then he's acting in in in bad faith, or at least is not acting in good faith. Is that is that right? … Are there any questions of first impression that air still left for decision?

Oral argument — Jose Hernandez v. Larry Miller Roofing, Inc., et a

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2015

And there may have been periods of time in Mr. Hernandez's employment when Mr. Miller was not engaged in the company sufficient to make him an employer for that period of time. … Well, I guess it was discussed earlier, that sort of comment. It always happens the administrative sort of hold it in abeyance. I'm not sure whether that's true. I honestly don't know.

Oral argument — Beverly Hawkins v. AT&T

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2019

That intermittent leave was not under the Family Leave Act. Again, she had already exhausted her Family Leave Act months earlier. So that cannot be protected conduct. … We believe that we were supplied information regarding Jamie Hayward outside of the relevant time period. The relevant time period here is 2013 to 2014.

Oral argument — 2200 West Alabama, Inc. v. Western World Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018

Knight, while it's still ringing in our ears, how about responding to that last comment made by Mr. … The last comment Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Gladstone Morrison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2016

Judge Fleury- Well, I don't see that two-week time period necessarily being a debilitating factor to the credibility of that proffer, Your Honor. … It criminalizes an act that facilitates another person's crime when the act is undertaken willfully and with knowledge of the circumstances that make the other person's act illegal.

Oral argument — Martha Romero v. City of Grapevine, Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2018

Velopondo committed what this court calls a manus act, in other words, the act which would precipitate the use of deadly force. … Here, the time period is pretty extensive.

Oral argument — United States v. Luis Rodriguez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 3, 2018

that may may have occurred I mean but that issue is not before the court but given that I that for whatever reason I missed it the second purpose of the notice was not met in this case and I I'm not period … guideline case even in or the court rejected that it was as a factual matter that it had been consolidated but the analysis was was according to bar he can't he can't meet the test of being a single act

Oral argument — Margaret Thibodeaux-Woody v. Houston Community Col

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2014

This is a classic case of disparate treatment under Title VII, in addition to a classic Equal Pay Act claim. … I think if the comments, the alleged comments are the basis for the Title VII sex discrimination, they don't rise. There's many cases in this circuit.

Oral argument — CEH Energy, L.L.C. v. Intrepid Drilling, L.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017

McKenzie case has a nice comment that I hadn't picked up on until I was studying. … In this case, the only allegation is that defendants, not even specific to King-Miller, defendants acted with Sienter, period. That's paragraph 203 of the amended complaint. Woefully insufficient.

Oral argument — Preston Hollow v. Cottonwood Devel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2021

So, it is complicated, Your Honor, but in April of 2020, between the February and May time period, the Preston Hollow Capital received an order out of the Superior Court of Delaware and a litigation that … Cottonwood acted and its actions are fairly attributable to the city under Rundis.

Oral argument — Fort Bend Indep School Dist v. Douglas A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

I represent Fort Bend Independent School District in this appeal of the District Court's decision under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. … And my earlier comments about concerns about their permission to use drugs do not mean to reflect that they're overall bad parents. I do have a concern about that one.

Oral argument — Wayne Klocke v. University of TX at Arlington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

And so — What would that time period be? Well, it would have been within the — the 12b period after the filing of the — in service of the complaint. … Well, and to address your comment, Judge Jones, there are certainly different anti-SLAPP statutes. Each state's anti-SLAPP statute is different from the others.

Oral argument — United States v. State of Mississippi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017

I think that he ignored, he didn't even comment on the testimony of Principal Sanders' hiring of the girls' basketball coach, his total violation. … But in this instance, Your Honor, there is no such act, there is no such event, there is no such act of discrimination that someone has brought forward and said, well, this is confirmation of the district's

Oral argument — Ntl L & Fire Ins Co v. Riata Cattle Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2022

It's not actually a Motor Carrier Act, and I would note that the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act is also found in Title VII. They're just in different subchapters. … Ochoa was employed for a period of two years and that he was employed directly by RIADA.

Oral argument — June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. James Cald

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2018

Heron's comment about Justice Alito's comment regarding the record in this case? Your Honor, honestly, I'm not sure I can specifically recall exactly what Justice Alito said. … I think that Justice Breyer commented that there was evidence in this case.

Oral argument — Bruce Fulmer v. Scott Klein

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017

And of course, there were meetings of the board during this period, and they actually decided to stop investments in company stock during this period, which again, somewhat is inconsistent with their argument … Also, your opinion in Perez, the last few sentences of Subpart 2B, one of your comments was very clear that we don't have to prove some other loss. The loss is clear.

Oral argument — United States v. Gomez-Santacruz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2022

Guidelines there were 21 to 27, but this court affirmed a 120-month period. Well, do file a letter on that so that opposing counsel can respond. Certainly. … I think that the inarticulate comments could be another version of substantive reasonableness error.