Documents

Oral argument — Sebastian v. Swan Wealth Advisors, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2019

So our argument is that at that point in time, the slate is essentially wiped clean as of April. And if there has to be, if there's more material breaches. … However, in other contexts it's, you know, a wanton disregard of the rights of others and a conscious, voluntary act or remission in reckless disregard of a legal duty. So.

Oral argument — Henley v. Schaaf

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2017

That means that we were on a clean slate. We could proceed, we could add witnesses, we could add evidence, we could do anything we wanted to do at that point. … Well, is it true that Judge Clark took the position that you cannot raise, bring in new evidence, period, that is different than the first trial?

Oral argument — Wright v. Estate of Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2011

Did she work for him during any of that period of time? When she performed, Mr. Johnson maintained, was self-employed as a garage mechanic in the city of St. … Louis, cooking and cleaning and doing housekeeping work, and that he wanted to move closer to her. There was no contrary evidence.

Oral argument — People v. Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2010

And third, that the State failed to prove the unreasonable doubt the defendant did not act in self-defense. … Forget the fact that we don't accept a defendant's comments directly. Not to say we never can, but we have to have an additional fact.

Oral argument — People v. Jiles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2010

In that period of time, the actual perpetrator could have been long gone. He was much further away. Mr. Giles was in the area around 9 o'clock. … Your Honor, a Supreme Court Rule 431B was violated when the trial judge failed to question the jurors on two of his air principles.

Oral argument — People v. McMiller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2026

So the act is the same over a three-year period we're talking about. The victim is the same. It's the State. And the goal is the same. It's to recover this ill-gotten money. … These other comments the State is making about experts or Rule 701, those aren't hearsay responses.

Oral argument — People v. Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 19, 2017

First, the trials were aired in denying the motion to suppress statements in the first video, following Mr. Lee's request for counsel. During the first video, Mr. … Lee's previous comments that they were wasting time. He tells the officers they're wasting time. And State argues that this detracted from his very direct comment that occurred later.

Oral argument — Sheth v. Sab Tool Supply Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

She rendered one, and then after the deposition of the plaintiff's expert, she rendered a second opinion to try to clean up what she had said the first time. … Under the law, the entire compensation in that period of breach of duty should have been forfeited.

Oral argument — People v. Hawkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

, the danger there is the jury would have thought, well, okay, defense counsel was floating up a balloon as to what he might have possibly said, but then the defendant doesn't back it up and then the air … There'd be periods of moments when he sat and said nothing, and then periods of moments where he was musing as to what happened.

Oral argument — Bryton Properties LLC v. Kids Work Chicago, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2022

Under the eviction act, the landlord who meets those requirements. … The order does not comply with the eviction act. You have to have a right to possession to bring an action under the act. The party that brought the action. We're way past that.

Oral argument — People v. Allgood

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2019

You can't create these charges out of thin air, which is what you have to do. It's not out of thin air. … It's grabbing it out of the air.

Oral argument — Kelly v. Kelly

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2025

They were so underwater that she went back to work for a short period of time. … Can you comment on that? Yes, by the statute, the first argument is you have to make a determination of what one of the three estates is.

Oral argument — Gallagher v. The Union Square Condominium Homeowners Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2010

, further the purpose of the act, that is to encourage owners to keep a clean pathway, let's say? … Was there any case cited to the legislative debates or comments made by the legislators concerning the passage or the intent of this statute? No.

Oral argument — People v. Jake

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 24, 2013

But the statute itself, there's a statute that permits evidence of prior domestic violence acts. … Jake had no defense and chose voluntarily not to testify and counsel the strategy, which Justice Connex already commented on.

Oral argument — People v. Minor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2019

His drugs were clean. Perhaps most importantly, he was to obtain drug treatment. He underwent not just one, but two separate drug programs, and he satisfactorily completed those. … He was acting under a serious misapprehension here as to the conduct for which he was sentencing this individual.

Oral argument — People v. Downey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2024

The Air and Air Union's Honorable Appellate Court for the Second Condition District is now back in session. The Honorable Robert D. Taylor presides. Please be seated. Call the case, please. … And she testified to the two acts, which was that he had choked her and that he had pushed her.

Oral argument — People v. Royer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 30, 2020

And, um, so whether it's air, I mean, at the time, what did he say about home environment and etcetera? That's what I'm asking about. Okay, so yes, about that. … No, there's no, it's a terrible act that he does.

Oral argument — Freidman v. White

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 30, 2015

There's a paucity of legislative intent, period. Unlike the state park issue, which is very clear. I mean, they can be discoupled, or maybe that's the wrong word. Decoupled, thank you. … However, the General Assembly, they're talking about the Pension Reform Act, dealt with the challenges facing our state by doing just that.

Oral argument — Tirio v. Dalton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2019

Prosnitz Good morning We're going to get into your argument Because obviously you know it's hanging in the air Does this case moot? … being Stated are false Anything shy of False factual speech That is vigorous political opinion Has to be Forbidden You cannot pick and choose It frankly is the most ugly speech That warrants the highest Period

Oral argument — People v. Singleton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2019

His statement was that the jury wouldn't have been present in court that day had the defendant acted like a law-abiding citizen. … What about the trick comment? Again, the trick comment, although somewhat subtle, he states that the defense was trying to trick the jury.