Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.38s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Town of Norwood v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
Cir. 1982) .......... 24 Town of Concord v. FERC, 955 F.2d Oe, Tu eee SOE AG RS GR 22 United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp., 345 UE. … App. 8a-10a; 202 F.3d at 399.
531 U.S. 818Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lenore Luann Albert, Petitioner v. State Bar of California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 15, 2018
Ct. 778].........................................................................................24 Williams v. … Illinois, 399 US 235 (1970), and Tate v.
Reply Brief — United States v. DiFrancesco
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1980
Forcellati, 610 F. 2d 25, cert. denied, No. 79-5945 (Mar. 24, 1980) ....... 4 United States v. Grayson, 438 U.S. 41 ............... 6 United States v. llacqua, 562 F. 2d 399, cert. … Wilson, 420 U.S. 332 (1975), involved a correction of an error of law (Br. 23- 24).
444 U.S. 1070Reply Brief — Ford Life Insurance v. Miller
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1995
Dobbs Mobile Bay, —— So. 24 ——, No. 1921552 (Ala. Feb. 24, 1995) -..2222...22....-ccccceeeceeeeee 4,5 Mills v. … Feb. 24, 1995) (Appendix A of Peti- tioner’s Brief, p. 7(a)) (emphasis added).
516 U.S. 864Petition for Rehearing — Esther Darnell, Petitioner v. Department of Justice, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Feb 7, 2025
Univ. of Houston, 399 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 2005) .. 02... . cece eee eee 8 Rules and Other Authorities Sup. Ct. R. 44.2 .. 0 ay ceaaedd 0% Ha FOREST 1G OE STES 1 Appellant’s Br, Darnell». … Univ. of Houston, 399 F.3d 601, 609 (Sth Cir. 2005).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lawrence T. Newman, Petitioner v. Robert W. York
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 11, 2019
State of Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966). … Id., 217 Ind. 93 at 107-112, 26 N.E.2d 399 (Ind. 1940).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Microsoft Corp. v. AT & T CORP.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325 ey eee Pee 5, 10 In re Beauregard, 287 F.3d 1583 (Fed. … Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2005)).
550 U.S. 437Opinion — Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1916
Howbert, 231 U.S. 399. … Beckett, 24 Beav. 114; Eley’s Appeal, 103 Pa. St. 300. ; Taxation cases cited have no importance here, as they arise under laws totally different. Gay v. Baltic Mining Co., 220 U.
240 U.S. 103Amicus Curiae Brief — Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden, Petitioner v. Patrick Dwayne Murphy
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 30, 2018
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 421 (1994). … Mississippi Band of 24 Choctaw Indians, 136 S.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008
:cssessseeee 24 Respondent’s Brief, Dekoladenu v. Gonzales, Nos. 04-2164 & 05-1737 (4th Cir. … Br. 24-27.'
554 U.S. 1Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pedro Ramirez-Urbina, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 22, 2023
Summary Calendar ____________ FILED May 24, 2023 Lyle W. … Farias, 469 F.3d 393, 399–400 (5th Cir. 2006). He states that the arguments are raised only to preserve the claims for further review. AFFIRMED. 3
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Maryland v. Anderson
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
Id. at 593, 399 A.2d 578. In such event, the accused ... walks out of the courtroom a free man." Id. at 593-594, 399 A.2d 578. … State, 284 Md. 588, 399 A.2d 578 (1979) is cited.
485 U.S. 913Reply Brief — Shawn William Wass, Petitioner v. Idaho
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 30, 2018
See Pet. at 24-25. … Rodriguez-Preciado, 399 F.3d 1118, 1141 (9th Cir. 2005) (Berzon, J., dissenting). 4.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — National Federation of Federal Employees v. Cheney
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
/d. at 396. 399 tUD. … Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399.
496 U.S. 936Opposition Brief — Hanson v. Arrowsmith
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
P. 24 warrants reversal only where irregularity affects substantial rights). Hanson, 872 F.2d at 749 (emphasis added). … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), this Court stated: [T]he question comes down to whether jury reli- ability is a function of jury size.
493 U.S. 944Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ottawa Tribe v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1964
O’ Mara, 122 Fed: Supp. 399 ene ks havea 10 Ww ornicke v. Scheuer, 11 M. 2d eo aies ee 9 Staetuies. - Charter of the City of. … ly, the Grand Jury issued a subpoena duces tecum to the petitioner, directing him to produce copies of his Federal - and State income tax returns for the years 1959, 1960, and 1961. : On September 24
379 U.S. 929Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Mancusi v. Stubbs
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1972
Green; 399.U%. if Ch hambers. v. alifor, 399: U. g “42 ae ’ ¢ ete toldwasser \ _ Brows: “41T-F. Dd 1169, (D. ron Cir.) cert, a Be den. 897-U DIF ine cid ow ov dat leet.. 5 ohn LeBaron v. … S. 18, . 24). Bhi . ‘B. PREJUDICIAL EFFECT OF USING THE: PRIOR TESTIMONY. Whether constitutional error -can he, excused because harmless, is in essence a faetual inquiry.
408 U.S. 204Opposition Brief — University of Pittsburgh v. Krynicky
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Tit. 24, §2510-2. The statutory language with respect to Pitt s identical, Pa. Stat. Ann. Tit. 24, §2510-202. … Tit. 24, §2510-9 and §2510-209.
471 U.S. 1015Amicus Curiae Brief — Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden, Petitioner v. Patrick Dwayne Murphy
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 30, 2018
Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ...................... 2, 4, 7, 10, 24, 29 Heckman v. United States, 224 U.S. 413 (1912) ........................................ 15, 20 Jefferson v. … Treaty of March 24, 1832, 7 Stat. 366, Art. XIV.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamed Kian, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2026
Williams, 399 U.S. at 99. This holding quickly devolved into arbitrary and untenable line-drawing. See Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978). … Id. at 24. Indeed, just two years before, the Court had reaffirmed the twelve-person requirement. See Duncan, 391 U.S. at 151–52.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.