Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.87s
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 22, 2004
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 13231Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 24, 2014
Page, Director, EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, to Regional Air Directors, EPA Regions 1-10, “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 69796Environmental Protection AgencyDraft Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 11, 2000
New Estimates for the Clean Air Act Amendments EPA has also called to our attention its new study, The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act 1990 to 2010, (EPA 1999) to supplement the set of studies … The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970-1990 (October 1997). U.S., Environmental Protection Agency. The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1990-2100 (November 1999).
65 FR 7198Management and Budget OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 1, 2007
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 5, 2007. … the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
72 FR 4671Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 27, 2024
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
89 FR 79189Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 22, 2021
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal from Louisiana submitted … Page, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2).”
86 FR 10509Environmental Protection AgencyClean Air Plans; Base Year Emissions Inventories for the 2015 Ozone Standards; California
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 29, 2022
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
87 FR 59015Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Ohio Particulate Matter
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 23, 2007
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
72 FR 2823Environmental Protection AgencyEnvironmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 31, 1998
18, 1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. … comment be invited by means of extending the review period.
63 FR 72310Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 8, 2003
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established … Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.”
68 FR 58019Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 3, 2015
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 67642Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 8, 2022
This determination is based upon monitored air quality data for the PM 10 NAAQS during the years 2015 through 2020. The EPA is taking this action pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA). … During this comment period we received no comments on our proposal. II.
87 FR 34797Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 29, 2005
EPA is approving these minor revisions to Virginia's regulations in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 22263Environmental Protection AgencyRevision to the Near-road NO2 Minimum Monitoring Requirements
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 30, 2016
Public Comments The EPA received 22 individual submissions on the proposal during the public comment period from public health and environmental groups, industry groups, state and local air monitoring … The third submission with adverse comment to the proposed rule was from Clean Air Watch.
81 FR 96381Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Oregon
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 22, 2003
The revisions were submitted in accordance with the requirements of section 110 and parts C and D of title I of the Clean Air Act (hereinafter CAA or Act). … There will not be a second comment period; therefore, any party interested in commenting should do so at this time.
68 FR 2891Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 14, 2015
We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 19931Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Jun 19, 2002
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL-7234-1] EPA Science Advisory Board Notification of Public Advisory Committee Meetings of the SAB Executive Committee and Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee … Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)—July 18-19, 2002 The Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) of the US EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) will meet on Thursday July 18 and Friday
67 FR 41722Environmental Protection AgencyPetition — Environmental Protection Agency v. Duquesne Light Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
Air Act Amendments of 1970:! … In adopting the Clean Air Act Amendments, the Ad- ministrator asserts, Congress decided that the expense of pollution control was not to be regarded as an impediment to achieving clean air.
427 U.S. 648Federal Register · Notice · May 27, 2014
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409D(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS and recommend … Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA requires that the Agency periodically review and revise, as appropriate, the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants, including oxides of sulfur
79 FR 30137Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 31, 1997
This action is taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (the Act) as amended in 1990. … The plan was not submitted under the National Highway System Designation Act, which amended the Clean Air Act I/M requirement in certain respects.
62 FR 41002Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.