Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.17s
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Bishop Processing Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1970
Whether thirty-one instances of malodor over a consecutive fourteen-week observation period constitutes as a matter of law a violation of the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U. S. … Prosecution of the case is based upon the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U. S.
398 U.S. 904Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 13, 2007
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
72 FR 52320Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California-South Coast
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 10, 2000
If the commentor continues to believe that these requirements were not met, he must resubmit comments during the public comment period for our rulemaking on the revisions to SCAQMD Rule 1113. … Air Act.
65 FR 18903Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 10, 2014
These revisions were submitted in accordance with the requirements of section 110 of the Clean Air Act (hereinafter the Act or CAA), which requires states to develop a plan for the implementation, maintenance … In the case of permitting stationary sources of air pollution, Ecology's submittal states that the intent of the Washington Clean Air Act is that local clean air agencies, EFSEC, and Ecology have primary
79 FR 39351Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 22, 2010
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 3680Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jun 23, 1994
The Clean Air Act was amended on November 15, 1990, Public Law 101- 549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. … Section 2(2) was amended to reference ``Section 107(d)(1) of 42 U.S.C. 7407 et seq'' in lieu of ``Section 107(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act.''
Environmental Protection AgencyState Operating Permit Programs; Maryland; Revisions to the Acid Rain Regulations
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 25, 2007
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 20428Environmental Protection AgencyRequest for Nominations of Candidates to the EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 2, 2015
Background: The Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) was established under section 109(d)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) (42 U.S.C. 7409) as an independent scientific advisory committee … Section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, as appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants.
80 FR 17743Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of Arizona Air Plan; Hayden Lead Nonattainment Area Plan for the 2008 Lead Standard
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 3, 2018
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Arizona to meet Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”) requirements … For fugitive lead-bearing dust control, ADEQ also used the following references for comparison: Appendix 1 of the General Preamble for Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act, 30 which describes
83 FR 31087Environmental Protection AgencyNational Environmental Performance Track Program
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 22, 2004
Air Act (CAA). … EPA is also in the process of developing other incentives in areas of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), and the Clean Air Act (CAA).
69 FR 21737Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 3, 1999
EPA's Small SI and Marine SI engines regulations adopt the Clean Air Act definition for the term ``manufacturer.'' … EPA requests comment on this proposed amendment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Section 216(1) of the Clean Air Act defines manufacturer as ``any person
64 FR 5251Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 1, 1999
Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 64 FR 18858. No comments were submitted to EPA during the comment period, which ended on May 17, 1999. IV. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
64 FR 35577Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Illinois; Regional Haze Progress Report
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 2018
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the regional haze progress report under the Clean Air Act (CAA) as a revision to the Illinois state implementation plan (SIP). … EPA's Response to the Comment—In our direct final rule, EPA noted that Illinois did not rely on the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) or CSAPR in its regional haze SIP. 82 FR 48432.
83 FR 15744Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 26, 2002
What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements? EPA approval of this SIP revision is governed by sections 110 and 182 of the Act. … Comments in support of the I/M program were received from the Baton Rouge Clean Air Coalition and the Steering Committee of the Baton Rouge Ozone Task Force.
67 FR 60594Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 14, 2000
EPA is approving these revisions to the Maryland SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.''
65 FR 2334Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 1, 2015
We propose to approve the submitted reasonably available control technology (RACT) SIP revision under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 52710Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 16, 2024
The EPA's approval of this rule revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective March 18, 2024. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
89 FR 12244Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Kansas
Federal Register · Rule · May 29, 2007
This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking body. … EPA received no comments on the proposal.
72 FR 29429Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Arizona; Pinal County Air Quality Control District
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 23, 2021
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted.
86 FR 46986Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 19, 1997
Background In 1990, Congress amended the Clean Air Act to address, among other things, continued nonattainment of the ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). Pub. … Notice and comment are unnecessary because no EPA judgment is involved in making a non-substantive finding of failure to submit elements of SIP submissions required by the Clean Air Act.
62 FR 27201Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.