Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.29s
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 12, 2016
We received three comments during the comment period on our proposed SIP disapproval. … Comment: Luminant stated that we must reopen the comment period for the CSAPR Update rulemaking.
81 FR 53284Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 2, 2000
Delegation of NESHAPs Section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA), authorizes EPA to delegate to state or local air pollution control agencies the authority to implement and enforce … Authority: This action is issued under the authority of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 7412. Dated: February 18, 2000. David P.
65 FR 11231Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 30, 2001
We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 59699Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 10, 2002
EPA publishes regulations under sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act requiring states to submit control plans to EPA. … Air Act.
67 FR 39628Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Emissions: Group IV Polymers and Resins
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 6, 1997
Air Act section 301(a)(1). … Reconsideration is being undertaken pursuant to Clean Air Act section 307(d)(7)(B).
62 FR 30993Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 31, 2022
This revision addresses the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2012 annual fine particle (PM 2.5 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). … This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: This rule is effective June 30, 2022.
87 FR 32316Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 2, 1999
The intended effect of this action is to approve regulations and facility-specific requirements in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
64 FR 48095Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 8, 2013
The Maintenance Plan meets the requirements of Section 110(a)(1) of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), EPA's rules, and is consistent with EPA's guidance. … Wegman to Air Division Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean Air Act, May 20, 2005).
78 FR 48318Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 21, 2001
EPA is approving these revisions to establish RACT requirements in the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Air Act.
66 FR 43779Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Revisions to the Georgia State Implementation Plan
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 13, 2000
Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
65 FR 13239Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 30, 2007
The final rule contains the funding share for eligible projects that complies with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5308 and the Clean Air Act. … Accordingly, the Federal share for eligible projects cannot exceed 90 percent of the net cost to comply with or maintain compliance with the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 15049Transportation DepartmentFederal Transit AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Sep 1, 2000
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
65 FR 53180Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 28, 2023
Public Comments and EPA Responses The 30-day public comment period for the notice of proposed rulemaking closed on August 28, 2023. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
88 FR 89587Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; Transportation Conformity
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 8, 2008
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective April 8, 2008, unless EPA receives adverse comments by March 10, 2008. … Air Act.
73 FR 7465Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 16, 1998
Air Act. … under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
63 FR 49436Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 13, 1997
Background Subpart 2 of Part D of Title I of the Clean Air Act contains various air quality planning and State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission requirements for ozone nonattainment areas. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
62 FR 32204Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; MO; Control of Emissions From Volatile Organic Liquid Storage
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 4, 2023
Missouri received ten comments from two sources during the comment period on 10 CSR 10-5.500. The EPA provided nine comments. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
88 FR 68469Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 3, 2001
EPA's Extension Policy is inconsistent with Clean Air Act sections 179 (c) and (d). … is embodied in Clean Air Act provisions, in determining the applicable attainment date.
66 FR 586Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 17, 2004
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received comments from the following parties. 1. … Comment 8: Earthjustice argues that the District's offset equivalency tracking system fails to comply with “some of the most basic elements” of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 27837Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 15, 2006
The proposed interpretation is correct in principle and consistent with the plain language of the rule and the Clean Air Act. B. … We disagree with the comment that cites section 504(b) of the Clean Air Act as the only provision of title V that authorizes EPA to adopt new monitoring requirements.
71 FR 75422Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.