Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Allick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Yeah, I think it says, I have a quote, after considerable deliberation, we, the jurors of this case, are presently in a deadlock, period. … We await for further instructions or information regarding this case, period. Exactly. And the language of that note is important for several reasons.

Oral argument — Brownv.JEVIC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Yeah, they filed it initially in Federal Warrant Act as an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy, and then amended it and included the state act. … There are no defenses under the state act. Additionally, the state act doesn't give 60 days pay. The state law provides for one week of pay for each year of service.

Oral argument — InreForeverGreen AthleticvDawson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2015

Compliance under B, proof under H after trial that they are not acting in a certain fashion, the court shall. … The significance is during that period no motion was ever filed by the appellant, as stated at the time of the hearing.

Oral argument — Siluk v. Merwin

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2014

and I represent appellant Michael Silek jr I'd like to reserve two minutes of my time for rebuttal And I'll assume that's granted Congress struck a balance when it enacted the Prison Litigation Reform Act … end I'm not aware of any legislative efforts to try to clarify this just yet, but I Agree with you that there's you know some concerns here about administering two different systems at the same time No comment

Oral argument — Hartv.Electronic Arts Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2012

Is it used to comment on the role of athletes in society? … And I know that Judge Wilson applied the transformative act. Judge Wilson and others.

Oral argument — Koronthalyvs L'OREALUSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2009

The drug was recalled because the manufacturer could not guarantee that users would use it for a short time period as it was intended. … I would like to preliminarily address a comment that was made by my adversary when he was up here to the extent it's relevant.

Oral argument — Urcinoli v. Atty Gen NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

I understand how things work in district courts, and it would be very difficult for this Court to say you must act on habeas petitions at least to determine if they're mixed within X period of time. … Biasi, this panel sat on Tuesday, the other half of this sitting, and I commented about how delighted I was that the first three of the four cases all had female lawyers arguing.

Oral argument — United States v. Menendez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 29, 2016

Not qualified, period. … Melgen-related comment that I've given you in that hypothetical? Not the way you phrased it to me, it would not. But that's not the facts.

Oral argument — United States v. Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2011

At least two times during this re-sentencing hearing, she made comments on the record that she had other matters pending on her calendar. … Where she committed procedural error here and violated Glynther is that she did not allow oral argument after she made the ruling on the departure motion on the 3353 Act.

Oral argument — Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 1.01 Acres

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2014

The Natural Gas Act 717H provides the power of eminent domain where a certificate holder has the right of eminent domain. This is subsection H. … That's why you have federal oversight, and that's why you have the public's ability to comment.

Oral argument — Greene v. Palakovich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010

And in Speech Act, that did not deter the court. But you're not answering the question. … As part of your argument, to the extent it depends on what I'll call policy, that there could be a lengthy period where a conviction isn't final.

Oral argument — Covingtonv.Int'l Assocof Approved Basketball Officials

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 24, 2013

For Board 193, there's been a series of assigners over a period of time. There's usually one or two assigners at any one period of time. So that assigns all the games for the regular season. … Langley's last comments? Right.

Oral argument — Sharev.Krueger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2013

And I believe they looked at it over a five-year period from 2006 to 2011, but I do not know specifically. … That's why I conditioned my comment earlier on, you know, assuming that these conditions could be objectively verified.

Oral argument — In Re SBRMCOA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2017

Your Honors, the, I've listened to your comments, and I want to address them directly. The background legal context to this case are the two Supreme Court cases of Buckeye Cashing v. … But the issue here is that there's this historic period of time during which this contract was invalidly entered in violation of the declaration and there are claims remaining out of that historic period

Oral argument — Gvmtof VIv.Maynard

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2010

Weeks' crack addiction and pathological liar comment before addressing the names of the people arrested. … If Brady violations were predicate acts, the agency's office would be a Rico enterprise.

Oral argument — .11-2485.11-2527Addieetalv.Kjaeretal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2012

He also found that the exception relating to the Open Shorelines Act, which I refer to as the OSA here, that the OSA was a material breach. … Because remember, under the contract, sellers were entitled to a 10-day cure period of any timely objection, including the objection to raising the dock permits.

Oral argument — In Re SCH Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2014

We do feel that the record that was before her would support the act of mootness. I'm prepared to give a laundry list of why it's substantially consummated. … The defenses that might be raised, for instance, we are receiving funding over an extended period of time. Again, installment payments. One's due hopefully soon.

Oral argument — Khazin v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2014

And as Judge Fuentes mentioned earlier, the Dodd-Frank Act specifically states the exact acts that were enacted before that are then given this pre-dispute. You know what, I can't understand it. … And there was a prolonged period of comment and review where Congress did entertain potential amendments and this issue as far as, I guess, definitively stating that it did, that the prohibition on pre-dispute

Oral argument — Koons v. Atty Gen US A

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2026

You will not find a single case that a plaintiff has cited from either the founding period or the antebellum period or Reconstruction that says restrictions at sensitive places in many jurisdictions adopted … It can't be that if you're just going about for self-defense and you're not acting in a fray or breach of the peace that you could restrict that.

Oral argument — DLJ Mortgage Capital v. Sheridan

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2020

Sheridan was made aware at a certain point in time of the Truth in London Act, and he sought to advance claims and defenses pursuant to that Act. … Boykin's comment that there was another document or there may be other documents out there that suggested that somebody else had a title interest in this property. Could you address that?