Documents

Oral argument — Eileen McAfee v. Christine Boczar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2013

Briggs, the 1986 case, and specifically to the decisions or the comments made by Justice Powell. … And that goes directly to judge Duncan's comments about the constitutional right, the stake here and vindicating that value.

Oral argument — Bradford Kendrick v. Carter Bank & Trust, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2025

And, yes, it was on PACER for a period of time, but they asked us to remove it. It was immediately removed. Exhibit one. … Number two, they raised the frequency of age-related comments that they say were pervasive in your bank.

Oral argument — United States v. Bruce Winston

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2016

The prior conduct here, it occurred at a different time period three years earlier. … Winston made so many cringeworthy comments, you know, in terms of, you know, just thinking as a prior attorney defending people, the number of comments that he made, false explanations, the shale energy

Oral argument — Jamila Grice v. Independent Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025

The statute can only apply in state court, period. How do you get to Erie from that? … The Supreme Court's kind of I call it throwaway language, just an offhand comment about its application.

Oral argument — Courthouse News Service v. George Schaefer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021

Please correct me if I'm wrong on the facts here, but I thought that there was a period of time in which you voluntarily did this. Your Honor, no, that's not correct. It's not true. … You act like the First Amendment doesn't apply to the state of Virginia. The First Amendment... It's the Supreme Law of the land. It's written in the First Amendment.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Sterling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016

The district court's venue instruction, which allowed the jury to find venue in the Eastern District, so long as an act, any act, in furtherance of Sterling's crime occurred in the Eastern District. … Trunk is referring to when these documents were submitted was toward the end of trial, and it was a very, very brief period.

Oral argument — John Vannoy v. Federal Reserve Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2016

Under the FMLA, each employee is eligible for a maximum of 480 hours per rolling 12-month period. … So that comment that I have no business being here can't be construed as a request for FMLA leave. He simply did not suffer any injury.

Oral argument — Daniel Jackson v. D. Dameron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025

I appreciate your comments about how you could consider the bunk bed and the second floor as accommodation sort of issues. … He's told he can't say Americans with Disabilities Act or those kinds of things. I mean I asked Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Carlos Turcios Villatoro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2026

The closing, they talked about this witness who came and said, from this time period, I was with Tercios. I mean, there was no, that wasn't anything that anyone objected to as being improper. … And yet, this closing that supposedly was tainted from the start drew no comment in its substance or style from the trial court throughout.

Oral argument — Rosa Cabrera Vasquez v. Matthew Whitaker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2018

That doesn't show a past act of acquiescence. … But that's not a backhanded comment. That's an attempt to weigh her personal experiences against the totality of the evidence.

Oral argument — Tim Brundle v. Wilmington Trust, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2018

I hear you on that, and I think that's a fair comment. … The reason that we require the trustee, well, we have a risk of period.

Oral argument — Williamson Farm v. Diversified Crop Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2018

The initial comment by counsel was, he said there's one issue, whether the standard applicable for review of arbitration and all other cases is somehow different from crop insurance cases. … There's been quite a long period of time, and plus the district court's decision did not make any reference to what would happen next. It simply vacated the award.

Oral argument — Michael Dilworth v. Adams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2016

It's a cooling-off period. They have to have that, and then they can find out what happened later. … Would you acknowledge that there can be some restrictions on those sorts of privileges, which would nonetheless fall short of a penal act or punishment?

Oral argument — Kathy A. Netro v. GBMC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2018

Netro, as the personal representative of the estate of a Medicare beneficiary, Barbara Bromwell, has standing to proceed under 42 U.S.C. 1395Y, B3A, the private cause of action for Medicare Secondary Pay Act … I can't believe the purpose of the statute is to get somebody who the questions, comments of opposing counsel have indicated this person based on the record is not a bad actor.

Oral argument — United States v. Stephen McFadden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2014

We have these vagueness challenges periodically, but aren't they really just dressed-up mens re challenges, and doesn't it come down to a jury question as to whether somebody, because you don't want somebody … Just a couple of brief comments in response to Ms. Hudson's argument. First of all, all of the issues, all of the times where there seems to be some suggestion that Mr.

Oral argument — Robyn Bomar v. Board of Education of Harford County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2025

And there were four more assistants during that period that were appointed from the pool. If the candidate didn't succeed the first time, then you could be in the pool, right? Yes, correct. … This Court found in Wanamaker that she established pretexts upon which a jury could reasonably find that her acting supervisor harbored discriminatory animus towards her, built a case against her based

Oral argument — Core Communications, Inc. v. Verizon Maryland LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2013

Judge Motz in the district court level made some comments about, well, he found that there was absolutely no bad faith on your part or no intentional misconduct. … The breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing does not mean you acted in bad faith.

Oral argument — United States v. Catherine Chollet

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026

And I appreciate the court's comments. … It says venue may, essential acts may have happened, but where was the criminal act done?

Oral argument — United States v. Erasto Gomez-Jimenez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2014

It's got to be affirmative acts by... Is there training in there? I think training is one of the words. … And these affirmative acts, again, that are cited...

Oral argument — Certain Underwriters v. Max Cohen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2015

the policy he cannot collect any benefits what he can collect he can suffer the injury and that's what this policy ensures against is the injury that would prevent you from doing from performing the act … Frey made some comments about Thomas Peterson he was not an insignificant player in the role here and Peterson International was not an insignificant entity here Mr.