Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,092 results
0.10s
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2024
And I think looking at the docket from that time frame, that was a period when the parties agreed to attempt informal resolution of the case. … And at that point, they wanted to bring in someone else to address her comments.
20 min of audioOral argument — Wopsock v. Natchees
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2006
claim, there's no jurisdiction, period. … Can you comment on that? It was argued. Yes.
29 min of audioOral argument — ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2019
Section 101 of the Patent Act expressly permits the patenting of any new improvement of any machine. ChargePoint's claims fall squarely within that provision. … The decision in smart systems commented that the claims were not reciting an improvement to the bank card.
32 min of audioOral argument — Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015
It has been held to require affirmative act. There's this plant protection... … And that's what the commentators were saying at the time. I don't think any of that's binding.
30 min of audioOral argument — Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Coca-Cola Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2025
In this situation, the server periodically downloaded without being asked to by the dispenser. … There was a hearing before the district court on remand, and RCBI said very clearly in this hearing that it was going to amend its contentions to include the Freestyle Act.
25 min of audioOral argument — Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Coca-Cola Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2025
In this situation, the server periodically downloaded without being asked to by the dispenser. … And RCBI said very clearly in this hearing that it was going to amend its contentions to include the Freestyle Act.
25 min of audioOral argument — Thetford Properties III, L.P. v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2014
You said it was unproven, Your Honor, and what we would say is that there was no Bel Air hearing by Judge Damage. … So to the extent that the discretion is limited, then HUD can't act.
106 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2010
And two, did that condition manifest itself within a temporally significant period of time, pertinent period of time? Those are both table considerations. … If you have any questions for me, I'd certainly field them, but you anticipated most of my comments with your questions.
55 min of audioOral argument — TCL Communication Technology v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2019
I'm only acting for – So then it does come down to how we should characterize the release payment. … My question is, then, hypothetically, this court would issue an opinion that doesn't comment at all or rule at all on any of the plethora of Fran-related issues. Yes, that's right.
63 min of audioOral argument — REALTIME DATA, LLC v. MORGAN STANLEY
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013
The combination acts as a descriptor because the presence of a field indicated by the presence map and the template identified by the template identifier indicate how the field is encoded. … And actually, I'd like to start with that, since that was a nice, clean little piece that was discussed earlier. I'd like to respond to what Mr. Thomas said with regard to the timing.
69 min of audioOral argument — REALTIME DATA v. THOMAS REUTER CORP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013
The combination acts as a descriptor because the presence of a field indicated by the presence map and the template identified by the template identifier indicate how the field is encoded. … I'll also address the doctrine of equivalence ruling by Judge Forrest and actually, I'd like to start with that since that was a nice, clean little piece that was discussed earlier.
69 min of audioOral argument — Fleming v. Escort Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2014
And one of the comments made in the second email is that could we... This is discussing Mr. Orr's idea. … Surely the standard of abandonment suppression and concealment requires something more than simply not acting as soon as you possibly can.
64 min of audioOral argument — Reardon v. DHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2010
I want just a discussion of how they've been doing, has their performance continued, have they improved, have they fallen off since the last rating period. Well, I... … I guess I'm not seeing how his comment, which is, I think this is a problem, turns what is otherwise not a disclosure at all because it's already known.
41 min of audioOral argument — Zelenka v. OPM
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2009
But I think that if you look at each of these months, I think that some, for example, on Act 1127. You know what? … Different time periods. I don't know that it's.
33 min of audioOral argument — Celgene Corporation v. Peter
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2019
In paragraph five, it talks about women of childbearing potential who should agree to stop taking thalidomide immediately should they miss a period. … That's not going to act as a contraception. And that was, I think, a fair reading of this sentence.
23 min of audioOral argument — +Amado v. Microsoft Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2006
Amato could have claimed this as first means for performing function acts, a spreadsheet program for doing that, but he didn't. He put those words in there. … Well, I think that's more a reference to also his comment, maybe this case is going to be settled, maybe it's going to go away.
42 min of audioOral argument — Fathauer v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2009
Don't we have to assume that Congress acts rationally with respect to various premium pay entitlements? I think assuming that Congress acts rationally is, yes, something we should do. … They would not have acted reasonably. Why not?
38 min of audioOral argument — Amgen Inc. v. Hospira, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2017
This court commented on that in the Apotex case. So on the facts of this, and there's very good reasons why that would be so. … Because as we make that, we work the time period in this.
38 min of audioOral argument — ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Johnson Health Tech Co. Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2016
And if he does not then complete the session, his record is marked so that coaching comments regarding this may be given later. … period, such as three seconds, which is something I think your trainer would like.
30 min of audioOral argument — LANDMARK SCREENS v. MORGAN LEWIS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2012
Did plaintiff act reasonably and was there any prejudice to defendant due to the delay in filing the action? … I understand that, but when he made the comment, he didn't say, I don't think you have a good equitable estoppel claim or equitable tolling claim on fraud. He just never got to it.
55 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.