Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.23s
Supreme Court brief · Response to application from Power Company Respondents · Aug 19, 2024
Pallone noting “[t]hese ‘existing authorities’ include [Clean Air Act] Section 111”). … It provided an extended 75-day comment period as well as a supplemental comment period. 88 Fed.
Opposition Brief — Alabama Power Co. v. Environmental Defense Fund
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. … Moreover, Congress is presently considering legislation to amend the Clean Air Act by specifically addressing the issue of acid rain.
493 U.S. 991Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
language of the Clean Air Act.” … For example, the 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments provided a 90-day grace period for existing sources to bring their emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants (“HAPs”) to within prescribed limits. Pub.
549 U.S. 561Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Thus, for the period from 1970 to 1990, the benefits of the Clean Air Act exceeded its costs by more than 42 times. … ” under the Clean Air Act.
549 U.S. 497Opposition Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
ae ee 14 ciding to regulate lead additives under Section 211- (c)(1)(A) rather than to adopt alternative control strategies authorized by the Clean Air Act. 1. … received during the two previous comment periods.
426 U.S. 941Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 21, 2024
July 14, 1955, the Clean Air Act, as in effect immediately prior to the enactment of Pub. … This rule, issued after careful consideration of public comments, prescribes standards under section 112 of the Clean Air Act to control emissions of mercury and other toxic air pollutants from power plants
Appendix — New Jersey Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1973
of any plan or portion thereof which implements RTM SAONG AIR DAE LM ORE VEE Ie ORL AEE eet 18a Clean Air Act a@ national secondary ambient air quality standard for a period not to exceed 18 months … to the Clean Air Act. 17.
414 U.S. 989Joint Appendix — General Motors Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1990
Section 109%a) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … For an indefinite period, the state would be unable to act to balance dictated national priorities with the interests of its citizens and in- dustries as the Clean Air Act intended.
496 U.S. 530Petitioners Reply Brief — American Iron & Steel Institute v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983
Circuit has addressed the plantwide source issue' in the context of three different Clean Air Act programs with confusing, contradictory results. … Air Act amend that Act, review by this Court is unnecessary.
461 U.S. 956Supreme Court brief · Response to application from Power Company Respondents · Aug 19, 2024
Pallone noting “[t]hese ‘existing authorities’ include [Clean Air Act] Section 111”). … It provided an extended 75-day comment period as well as a supplemental comment period. 88 Fed.
Supreme Court brief · Response to application from Power Company Respondents · Aug 19, 2024
Pallone noting “[t]hese ‘existing authorities’ include [Clean Air Act] Section 111”). … It provided an extended 75-day comment period as well as a supplemental comment period. 88 Fed.
Petition for Rehearing — Peter Williams, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Jul 17, 2024
of Circuit precedent.1 Because the Clean Air Act confines judicial review of most major Clean Air Act issues to the D.C. … applies to the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
The pertinent provisions of the Clean Air Act (42 U. S. C. §§ 1857c-3, 1857f-1 and 1857f-6c), the Administrative Proce- dure Act (5 U. S. … No comment period was allowed on the final regulations. Petitioner filed its petition to review these regulations on De- cember 27, 1973, pursuant to Section 307 of the Clean Air Act (42 U. S.
Opposition — Timken Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub.L. No. 95-95, § 305(a), 91 Stat. 775 * * *. … It held that the notice and comment rulemaking procedures fol- lowed by EPA and supplemented with the court- ordered additional comment opportunity met the re- quirements of the Clean Air Act, the
439 U.S. 910Petition — Portland Cement Ass'n v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, § 111, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1857-6. 2. … Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, § 111, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1857c—6. 6.
423 U.S. 1025Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Environmental Protection Agency v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
The Relevant Provisions Of The Clean Air Act The Clean Air Act establishes a comprehensive pro- gram, based on principles of cooperative federalism, for controlling air pollution. … time for EPA to respond to comments raised during the afore- mentioned 90-day comment period; (iv) for those deficiencies identified during the 90- day comment period with which EPA agrees, EPA intends
540 U.S. 1104Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Parks-Cramer Co. v. American Monorail Co. (No. 533)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1957
New Patent Act”, 35 2 FORT ER Ain ic eee IC eee -16 Libert, “Section 103 of the Patent Act and the Standard of Invention: Comments on Lyon v. a - Optical Co. 38S. ‘Pat. Off. … or would blow the lint off. by fanning» In some mills certain~ _ portions of spinning frames such as underframe and ring _ Tail areas were cleaned periodically by compressed air (23a).
Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondent EPA · Oct 30, 2023
OAR is the EPA headquarters-based unit with primary responsibility for administration of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … (“NAAQS”) under the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or the “Act”). 3.
Respondents Brief — Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1980
As part of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … , criticism, and new datum submitted during the comment period.
446 U.S. 578Appendix — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2001
See Clean Air Act §§ 108-09, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7408-09. … available for public comment (hereinafter referred to as the “comment period”).
531 U.S. 457
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.