Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Norwood

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2022

And from that point, I can move on with a clean slate. … That did not exist at the time of the Victim Witness Protection Act.

Oral argument — Brennan v. City of Philadelphia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2021

Atkinson, who had made pretty egregious comments, racial comments, to not only him, but other city officials repeatedly over a period of time, wasn't asked, and in fact, nothing was done. … All right, but it's not as clean as the city saying, look, we're letting you go because you're oppositional or you're obstinate, right? It wasn't that clean, right? What about Mr.

Oral argument — Public Citizen Health v. United States Deptof Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2009

Now, the other part of our response, Your Honor, is in answer to your question, Judge Rundell, frankly, in the 90-day period we had for comment, one cannot simply go into a power plant and take environmental … OSHA also says, well, in the air contaminants rule, there's no requirement to give notice. That's because in the air contaminants rule, there's no requirement to do monitoring.

Oral argument — City Select Auto Sales Inc v. David Randall Associates Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2018

Clean Water Act, Clean Air, a whole bunch of federal statutes specifically impose civil liability on officers, directors, other individual actors of corporations. This statute doesn't. … , which is another thing we discussed in our supplemental brief, in distinguishing the Cullen case, which was also under the Lanham Act, but a very, very narrow provision of the Lanham Act.

Oral argument — Sosa v. Chertoff

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Sosa was a Federal Air Marshal trainee. … We have three different instructors administering the same test, the airplane tactics evaluation, within a five-week period. Three. Within a two-week period. Within a two-week period. Correct. Okay.

Oral argument — Holland v. Horn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2009

Regarding your aid claim again, you've talked about the case itself, but we're not writing on a clean slate here. … But until 98, it still was sort of up in the air, wasn't it?

Oral argument — Twpof Tinicum v. Cityof Phila

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2011

What's the 84 Act have to do with this? We sent you all a letter and asked, please comment on this Aviation Zoning Act, Pennsylvania's enactment in 1984. … And the Federal Aviation Act, obviously, as everybody knows, is intended to preempt the area of air safety. But Vision 100 is strictly an economic and environmental act.

Oral argument — United States v. Cleve-Allan George

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Stone for him to be the qualified person to conduct the air monitoring. And also, it's important to note that, with respect to the air monitoring, Mr. … George throughout the whole period. We don't know what was in those packages.

Oral argument — In Re Applicationof Chevron Corp Motion Hearing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2013

If I have to try to work to clean anything up, I'm going to try to do it. … In the first instance, the judge, within X period of time, has to give an order within X period of time has to give an order that sets the is a regime of times for the initial setting.

Oral argument — Mankodi v. Trump Marina Associates LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2013

For the benefit of both sides, for the benefit of the district court, shouldn't we clean it up? … But if there is a propensity to clean up, I just want...

Oral argument — Ocean County Landfill Corp v. US EPA Region II

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011

And we believe that according to EPA's theory, then by virtue of drawing these single source boundaries, they can actually render nugatory the provisions of the Clean Air Act that says only an owner or … EPA does understand that New Jersey was hesitant to act while this litigation was pending.

Oral argument — Autobar Systems of N J v. Berg Company LL C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024

So there's no question in our minds, Your Honor, that it is a franchise and that they were improperly terminated under the Franchise Practices Act. … And, you know, listening to Your Honor's comment about mootness before, the question would be, if this is immediate irreparable harm that occurred in April of 2023, and any time after this in 2024, in

Oral argument — In Re.Anadigics Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2012

At its core, the second event of complaint fails for what I would call its reliance on Oscar Madison style cleaning. … That was a late 2007, early 2008 time period. So when he says that it was a comment about the past, it is completely accurate.

Oral argument — United States v. Grant

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2017

Congress has not acted. … And do we have to pick a number out of play God and pick a number out of a hole out of the air?

Oral argument — United States v. Kuchler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The issue before this court is whether the district court acted in a reasonable fashion in sentencing Mr. Kukla, a lifetime supervisory release. … I have no further comments. Judge Weiss, anything further? That would be it. Okay, thank you. Thank you. I have no further comments unless you have questions of me.

Oral argument — Life Celebration Inc v. Xerox Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2021

That MSO was in place for five years, but yet during the five-year period, it is Xerox who paid for the air conditioning, the system, paid for it to be installed, and then paid for it to be repaired and … maintained over that five-year period.

Oral argument — United States v. Bailey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2016

It was a very long conspiracy period from October of 2010 until March of 2013. … And the judge even makes a comment. Now assume that's error. Yes.

Oral argument — Brown v. Wenderowicz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2011

Well, we have the time periods, the sunset and twilight. Let me talk about that time period. That time period was not in the record before the state court, was it? No. Okay. … And we're not here with a clean slate. We don't have a clean slate. We can't look at this in a clean slate. We have to look at what the State Court found. And was it objectively unreasonable?

Oral argument — Gates v. Rohm&Haas Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2010

If it was me, I'd want to know, and I would think it would be a significant benefit to know or a significant relief to know that I had that clean bill of health. … The risk to the individuals, would that vary by the period of actual time they spent in the village, not during one particular year, but during the entire 35-year period?

Oral argument — United States v. Howe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

over a two-year period of time, covering up that fraud by lying and providing false documents to many, many different people, including members of the Air Force. … A lengthy period of military service, 20 years. Correct.