Documents

Oral argument — Marshall v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2009

And that's the key air that I think is very important precedentially. Of course, Mr. … Marshall the differential between the two salaries for the period of 2004 to 2006.

Oral argument — LUCKY LITTER v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2010

It doesn't operate on a periodical basis. Your Honor, that's what they're referring to with the time system, a periodic system. It's not cat input, it's not human input. It's periodic. … But you still have a timing system in these inventions, don't you, in that a certain set period of time elapses after the cat leaves the box before it starts the automatic cleaning?

Oral argument — American Relocation Connection v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2019

You didn't challenge it within a proper time period, so we're stuck with that NAICS code. And based upon that NAICS code, their determination was there's not enough competition. … Actually, it was a Clean Air Act, I believe, challenge, but applying the same standard as under the APA. So I think that is the proper body of law to consult.

Oral argument — +Navy v. Bath Iron Works

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2007

The board found that cleaning, steam cleaning of a certain, on the material on the ship involved there, damaged a piece of equipment, and it was the equipment that had to be repaired, not simply reimburse … the costs of the additional cleaning.

Oral argument — Howard v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2015

But it's evidence of his abilities during the relevant back pay period, the period for which he's seeking back pay. And significantly, Mr. … Back Pay Act, but when you're talking specifically about the pay, there is a regulation that precludes, it says the agency may not include in the back pay calculation any period during which an employee

Oral argument — STAR SCIENTIFIC v. RJ REYNOLDS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2011

One passing comment, and even if we accept that that passing comment perhaps was a little bit over the line, there's one passing comment in a full and comprehensive closing argument. … No, it doesn't satisfy the claim limitations, because it's only talking about a treatment for a 24-hour period, and the claim limitation requires that the treatment be done for 48 hours.

Oral argument — Restoration Specialists, LLC v. Secretary of the Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2026

It says second option period, end of option period one through 365 days. … Just a couple of comments.

Oral argument — Lanier v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2023

We're talking about a six-month period between August and, well, seven, eight-month period between August of 2020 and May of 2021. So if he tested, his A1C was pretty high when he tested. … And the penalty is consistent with the Air Force table of penalties.

Oral argument — Messick v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2007

The law specifically says that they are limited to four activities, which are training, cleaning up after a fire is under control, providing first aid, and providing food and water. … They learn how to use air packs. They get certified in CPR. They learn how to attach the hoses under supervision. They just can't do it at the scene of a fire because of child labor laws.

Oral argument — ABT Systems, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2015

Rudd, the inventor, testified that it was well-known before his invention that the fan of a forced air HVAC system moved and circulated the air. That's what a fan does. … What about your friend's comment about your own expert's testimony? Yes, absolutely, because that question at that time was very specific as to what's the best time to run the fan.

Oral argument — CSX Corp v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2007

Now, in the decoupling act, what the Congress said was that the language of the act itself is all regulations. … I can't believe they pulled it out of thin air.

Oral argument — In Re i.am.symbolic, llc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017

Adams because he took a quote and he put periods between it and that's how he made it work. Oh, I see. … In DuPont, the court said that the overlap in the goods, potentially, one was for all-purpose cleaning detergents, and the other was for automobile cleaning detergents.

Oral argument — Yankee Atomic v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2008

The 91 rate is the one identified—the 91 period— That's adopted by PG&E. The judge in PG&E. … It had to be commented upon. It had to be generated. It had to be signed, all within a matter of weeks or a few months.

Oral argument — Bowers v. Shinseki

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2014

Therefore, you have to read this regulation in the full context and you have to assume, this Court must assume, that the Secretary acted within his authority to adopt the position that the government takes … Well, active military, naval, or air service does include 24-B, Your Honor, but you must keep reading on 24-B, and it says, any period of active duty for training during which the individual concerned

Oral argument — Contech Stormwater v. Baysaver Tech

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2008

I just want to comment. Desmore, you were referring to siphon. I refer you to column 7 in the patent, A72. … Would you agree with the district court that you did act as your own lexicographer with regard to the word siphon? No. No.

Oral argument — Syngenta Seeds v. Delta Cotton CO-OP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2006

That was not raised by Delta Cotton to the extent that Delta Cotton's main argument during trial was we did not have, we did not know all that wheat in our bin from which we drew to then clean and bag … Did the district court air in excluding evidence on the other than reproductive services exemption? The district court did not air in excluding timely disclosed evidence.

Oral argument — Medegen MMS v. ICU Medical

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2008

A displacement of air within the air chamber resulting from movement of the plug into a portion of the air chamber. That's describing the function. … Final comments, Mr. Pooley, for us?

Oral argument — Nunn v. Interior

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2006

Do you disagree that they were created after the period in question? I do not. Then why are they relevant? I'm sorry? Why are they relevant if they post-dated the period we're talking about? … That was the other comment I wanted to make. That's exactly right.

Oral argument — Government of Greece Hellenic Air Force v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2025

The Hellenic Air Force, your honor. We'll call it HAAF. … And you knew before the six-year period that you weren't going to get the goods. Well, we knew we weren't going to get functionally working cameras if that's what the court is talking about.

Oral argument — Government of Greece Hellenic Air Force v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2025

The Hellenic Air Force, your honor. We'll call it HAAF. … And you knew before the six-year period that you weren't going to get the goods. Well, we knew we weren't going to get functionally working cameras if that's what the court is talking about.