Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
4.05s
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 7, 2004
We are approving local rules that administer regulations and regulate emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 31739Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for Alaska
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 3, 2009
”), as mandated by the Clean Air Act (“the Act”). … As required by section 328 of the Clean Air Act, this rule simply updates the existing OCS rules to make them consistent with current COA requirements.
74 FR 9180Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 15, 2003
EPA is proposing to approve this redesignation request and maintenance plan because Colorado has met the applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended. … This action is being taken under sections 107, 110, and 175A of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 26248Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Aug 7, 2006
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) was established under section 109(d)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) (42 U.S.C. 7409) as an independent … Section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, as appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six criteria air pollutants.
71 FR 44695Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 26, 2012
The public comment period for these actions closed on December 16, 2011, and we did not receive any comments. II. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
77 FR 3933Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Ohio; Nitrogen Oxide Budget Program
Federal Register · Rule · May 8, 2025
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 19428Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Indiana; Attainment Plan for the Morgan County Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 9, 2019
Air Act. … Requirements for SO 2 Nonattainment Area Plans Nonattainment SIPs must meet the applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act, specifically Clean Air Act sections 110, 172, 191 and 192.
84 FR 32672Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 2, 2009
The commenter was concerned that such proposals are merely paperwork exercises and are not responsive to Congress' intent in establishing the area source program under the Clean Air Act which the commenter … (g) This subpart does not apply to research or laboratory facilities, as defined in section 112(c)(7) of the Clean Air Act.
74 FR 63236Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 3, 2018
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
83 FR 38033Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 2, 2016
Response to Comments During the public comment period, we received a comment regarding regional haze in California national parks. This comment does not apply to this rulemaking. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
81 FR 50626Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 20, 2001
Furthermore, EPA classified the area as “marginal” under Title I Part D Subpart 2 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. … Air Act.
66 FR 43488Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 28, 2004
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 77642Environmental Protection AgencyOperating Permits Program; Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 13, 1996
Background Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are those which must apply for and obtain an operating permit under title V of the Clean Air Act (Act). … Title: Clean Air Act Title V--Operating Permits Regulations, OMB Control Number 2060-0234, expiring September 30, 1996.
61 FR 30061Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Washington
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Aug 4, 1994
The state has met the applicable requirements for redesignation contained in the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA). … The EPA has reviewed this request for revision of the federally- approved SIP for conformance with the provisions of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments enacted on November 15, 1990.
Environmental Protection AgencyAcid Rain Program: Permits; Proposed Rule
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Nov 22, 1994
. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Title IV of the Clean Air Act, as amended by Public Law 101- 549, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (the Act), authorizes … Because the Agency will not institute a second comment period on this proposed rule, any parties interested in commenting should do so during this comment period.
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 17, 2014
EPA has evaluated the CAIR SIP revisions for Arkansas and Louisiana and made the preliminary determination that these revisions are consistent with the requirements of CAIR and the Clean Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
79 FR 21668Environmental Protection AgencyAir Quality Criteria for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 28, 2006
Background Section 108 (a) of the Clean Air Act directs the EPA Administrator to identify certain pollutants which “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare” and to issue air … Section 109(d) of the Act subsequently requires periodic review and, if appropriate, revision of existing air quality criteria to reflect advances in scientific knowledge on the effects of the pollutant
71 FR 10030Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 11, 2003
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, USEPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 69025Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 2, 1999
The EPA is proposing to disapprove these revisions to the Colorado SIP because the revisions are not consistent with the Clean Air Act (Act) and applicable Federal requirements. … Air Act, would not affect any existing requirements applicable to small entities.
64 FR 48127Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 26, 2005
Today we are proposing to approve revisions to the Tennessee and Georgia SIPs under sections 110 and 116 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … pollution earlier than the Clean Air Act deadlines.
70 FR 30382Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.