Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.19s
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 16, 2017
EPA is approving this revision in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
82 FR 47985Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 21, 2014
low emission vehicle standard under section 243(e)(2) of the Clean Air Act” as well as “the [applicable] emission standard [established by EPA] under section 202(i) of the Clean Air Act,” among other … found in EPA's light duty vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards under the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 15882Energy DepartmentFederal Register · Rule · May 11, 2006
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on June 12, 2006. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 27394Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 23, 2018
In addition, as explained above, and as demonstrated in the documents in the docket, the revisions meet the substantive SIP requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), including section 110 and implementing … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations
83 FR 42592Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 23, 2001
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established … This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking body.
66 FR 16137Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 17, 2014
These revisions do not have an adverse affect on air quality. EPA's approval of these rule revisions is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
79 FR 14613Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 3, 2011
The commenter believes the change will ensure adequate cleaning before inspection, which is essential to make sure the small cracks are visible. We agree. … for safety in air commerce.
76 FR 24793Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationAir Plan Approval; Ohio; Consumer Products Rule
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 10, 2023
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA … The public comment period for this proposed rule ended on March 29, 2023. EPA received no adverse comments on the proposal. II.
88 FR 43440Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 22, 1999
This revision was submitted to comply with the NOX requirements of the Clean Air Act (the Act). Also, Maryland's regulations are being revised by adding and amending definitions. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. versus U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
64 FR 33197Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 19, 2024
This action fulfills the EPA's obligation under the Clean Air Act (CAA) to determine whether the Las Vegas, Nevada ozone nonattainment area attained the NAAQS by the attainment date and to publish a document … The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation area is not a determination that the state has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country. 2 This date is August
89 FR 103657Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Disapproval; Louisiana; Removal of Excess Emissions Provisions; Correction
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 30, 2024
Air Act (CAA). … Comments on the November 8, 2024, proposed action were due on or before December 9, 2024. The EPA did not receive any comments on the November 8, 2024, proposed action. III.
89 FR 106328Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 25, 2010
SUMMARY: On June 1, 2009, EPA published a direct final rule approving the Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Cherokee County as a revision to … FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zuri Farngalo, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
75 FR 3870Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 6, 2011
These rule revisions satisfy the requirements of reasonably available control technology (RACT) and the Clean Air Act (CAA). … What public comments were received on the proposed approval and what is EPA's response? No comments were received. II. What action is EPA taking today and what is the purpose of this action?
76 FR 18893Environmental Protection AgencyFees for the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 5, 2018
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (Technical Standards) P. Environment (National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Air Act, Environmental Justice) I. Rulemaking Documents A. … Environment (National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Air Act, Environmental Justice) FMCSA analyzed this rule for the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq
83 FR 605Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · May 11, 2012
Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. … Air Act (CAA).
77 FR 27626Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Indiana; Update to CFR References
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 27, 2024
An explanation of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements, a detailed analysis of the revisions, and EPA's reasons for proposing approval were provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking and will not be … The public comment period for this proposed rule ended on September 16, 2024. EPA received no comments on the proposal. II.
89 FR 105459Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 20, 1998
Air Act (Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a [[Page 13532]] subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule.
63 FR 13531Environmental Protection AgencyAirworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 7, 2022
Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive Comments The FAA received comments from Air Line Pilots Association, Inc. … Conclusion The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as proposed.
87 FR 12565Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Apr 3, 1995
Procedural Background The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to observe certain procedural requirements in developing implementation plans for submission to the EPA. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
60 FR 16806Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 27, 2017
The EPA can provide sources up to 3 years to comply with emission limits in the Clean Air Act (CAA) standards. FA lines initially were given 2 years to comply with the emission limits. … We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
82 FR 34858Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.