Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.66s
Protocol Gas Verification Program and Minimum Competency Requirements for Air Emission Testing
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 28, 2011
The accuracy of EPA Protocol gases is important because these gases are used to help ensure that the national emission reduction goals of the Clean Air Act are met. … The accuracy of EPA Protocol gases is important because these gases are used to help ensure that the national emission reduction goals of the Clean Air Act are met.
76 FR 17288Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 20, 1998
Air Act (Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a [[Page 13532]] subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule.
63 FR 13531Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 25, 2010
SUMMARY: On June 1, 2009, EPA published a direct final rule approving the Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Cherokee County as a revision to … FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zuri Farngalo, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
75 FR 3870Environmental Protection AgencyStandards Improvement Project-Phase III
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 8, 2011
period required by law. … (a) * * * (1) * * * (iii) Individual hand towels, clean individual sections of continuous toweling, or air blowers; and PART 1919—GEAR CERTIFICATION 49.
76 FR 33590Labor DepartmentOccupational Safety and Health AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 2007
This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
72 FR 18389Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 15, 2013
307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act. … Petitions for Judicial Review, the first sentence is corrected to read as follows: “Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United
78 FR 49684Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 23, 1998
Air Act (Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule.
63 FR 20102Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 3, 1995
Procedural Background The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to observe certain procedural requirements in developing implementation plans for submission to the EPA. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
60 FR 16806Environmental Protection AgencyAddition of Natural Gas Processing Facilities to the Toxics Release Inventory
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 24, 2021
The initial 60-day comment period was January 6 to March 7, 2017. … ( e.g., Clean Air Act permitting) and thus are planned and controlled. 2.
86 FR 66953Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 8, 2008
General Requirements Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410( … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 46200Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 16, 2020
EPA is approving these revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's implementing regulations. … its public comment period for this proposed rulemaking.
85 FR 65706Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 23, 2002
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's NO X SIP Call regulations, Virginia was required to submit SIP measures providing for NO X emissions reductions, by October 30, 2000. … Notice and Comment Under the Administrative Procedure Act This document is final agency action but is not subject to notice-and-comment requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), 5 U.S.C
67 FR 48032Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 4, 2015
We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 3, 2015.
80 FR 53467Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Georgia: Air Quality Control, VOC Definition
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 22, 2020
EPA is approving this SIP revision because the State has demonstrated that these changes are consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: This rule is effective August 21, 2020. … Comments on the NPRM were due on or before June 1, 2020. EPA received no adverse comments on the NPRM. III.
85 FR 44214Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 15, 2021
Conclusion The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as proposed. … for safety in air commerce.
86 FR 71134Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationAir Plan Approval; Minnesota; Transportation Conformity Procedures
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 11, 2015
Transportation conformity is required under section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act (Act) to ensure that transportation planning activities are consistent with (“conform to”) air quality planning goals in … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment period.
80 FR 76863Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 22, 2016
National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Air Act FMCSA analyzed this rule in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq. ) and FMCSA's NEPA … In addition to the NEPA requirements to examine impacts on air quality, the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. ) also requires FMCSA to analyze the potential impact of its actions
81 FR 47714Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationNational Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Ferroalloys Production
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 30, 2015
Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) further provides that “[o]nly an objection to a rule or procedure which was raised with reasonable specificity during the period for public comment (including … Terms in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act (Act), in subpart A of this part, or in this section as follows: Bag leak detection system means a system that is capable of continuously monitoring
80 FR 37366Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 29, 2013
SUMMARY: EPA is approving portions of State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittals from the State of Arkansas to address Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) requirements in section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) that prohibit … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 53269Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 15, 2013
Air Act (CAA). … X, “State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (Act) Deadlines,” October 28, 1992.
78 FR 2882Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.