Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
5,768 results
0.13s
Oral argument — United States v. Jesus Buzo-Zepeda
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2010
And there we have comment 2, which we've already talked about. … So if I take comment 2, and I add that to 4A1.2K1, I'm left with, on the first, he was given a period of imprisonment, and whether he served at all or not, if he served any one day, I have to give it on
14 min of audioOral argument — San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2011
You know, they can just suck air. That's too bad because the statute gives us this priority. Is that a correct interpretation of the district court's ruling? … But we know that some of the things in the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act will overlap with that.
47 min of audioOral argument — Airs Fragrance Products, Inc. v. Clover Gifts, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2010
The creditors cleaned out their — I believe their office furniture, filing cabinets, bank accounts, everything else. … We're on here – this is Jeff Greger for Plaintiffs' Appellees' Air Fragrance Products and Monee Hakeem. We normally don't allow Sir Rebuttal. Very well. At least I don't.
41 min of audioOral argument — Abby Rios v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2018
Wagner, as he goes down the next aisle and is cleaning another aisle, this is the — how in the world could a working man who's cleaning a shop in one aisle know that a sippy cup was spilled — By coming … And in fact, if you look at jury instruction number 16, law does not say how a reasonable person would act under the circumstances. That is for you to decide, and then jury.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. WARD
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2006
The Court THE COURT He assumed it was the government was acting in good faith. MR. SCHAFFLER That's right. THE COURT Okay. MR. … He's not a clean, perfect person. I understand that.
25 min of audioOral argument — Leslie Merritt, Jr. v. State of Arizona
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2022
If it's inconclusive for a ballistics, for a ballistics examiner, if you say inconclusive, it's not a match, period. … And then he testified that as he proceeded to drive away, he started to lose air in that tire, and then at some point it started to lose air much more rapidly.
46 min of audioOral argument — Elizabeth Powell v. Sherman Hatcher
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010
The Court noted that, you know, how she had, at least to a certain extent, cleaned up her act by not having meth available, methamphetamine available to her. … Now, let's see, with respect to the do-you-too comment by Mr. Leavitt, once again, let's assume that you take that away. You still have her other admissions. You still have Mr. Berkman's testimony.
21 min of audioOral argument — Irvine Leen v. Harold Thomas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017
Apparently there was some criminal proceedings because the gentleman was cleaning the ditch. Yes, Your Honor. … How do you get charged criminally for cleaning your own ditch? I don't understand. Yes, Your Honor. It was a, Mr. Lean and a, and a tenant on his property were cleaning the ditch during the summer.
33 min of audioOral argument — Michael Racusin v. American Wagering
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 15, 2014
It always acted as if interest was owed during the gap period. It actually paid interest during the gap period until later when it decided it misinterpreted its own contract. … When the stock is deposited, things are still up in the air. Is that fair to say? They're still on appeal to this Court. It must be resolved. Right.
30 min of audioOral argument — Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2017
That's a little bit of time whether from the comments to Rule 41B that that seven-day claim period is important. … The comments, the 2002 comments, stress that the lady issued is to mandate nine days or more. The process is human-oriented procedures. I don't see how that could apply.
36 min of audioOral argument — Travis v. Knappenberger
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2003
Walmart stores-in case, 11th Circuit, 141F3rd, at page 1456, includes making negative comments about the employee. … And it would be helpful to me if you would boil it down, give me a nice clean schematic of how you see it. Okay.
36 min of audioOral argument — Isaac Rodriguez v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2019
Unlike the, you gotta clean your gun if you get mud on it, or your uniform, or whatever. Is that correct? Yes, Your Honor. … Do you have other comments you want to make? Yes, Your Honor.
32 min of audioOral argument — Garland Wilfong v. Tharco Packaging, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2016
And it was a short period of time. Hi, Mark. … I think those are straight comments, and they're straight comments that, with the exception of Ms. Lima's comment, didn't relate directly to Mr. Wilfong. Ms.
32 min of audioOral argument — Corey Weidner v. Jeri Taylor
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2018
She had a duty to act. And so the timing, in fact, was right for Mr. Weidner. … Appeals, the Court could reconsider it as plain air.
28 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Karen Markosian
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2015
I think the only other comment I want to make, I made my comment about Mantau. … On the Forrester issue, this is before the court on plein air.
85 min of audioOral argument — United States v. CRUZ-PEREZ
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2006
Cruz-Perez has regularly, during one period of his life, committed acts of violence while in this country. … They were not acts of violence.
22 min of audioOral argument — Donald Sherman v. William Gittere
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2023
But it did not show that the court's comments, which were two or three very short comments, impacted any other prospective juror to raise their religious beliefs. Mr. … If we're looking at that, mere evidentiary air has a couple components. Number one, they defer to the trial court about whether there was manifest air. That's not Chapman.
48 min of audioOral argument — Calop Business Systems, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2015
You put money in a trust during this brief period of time while you were trying to negotiate with the city. … That's a 2013 case that deals with the FAAA Act, the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, that is extremely similar to the Airline Deregulation Act, but it applies to motor carriers, and
32 min of audioOral argument — City of Los Angeles v. Bank of America
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2017
You know, in the Title VII case, it's extremely difficult to prove like a hostile work environment case with just one act of sexual harassment or something. You need a path, you need a. . . Correct. … And now we know from the comments the court made at the end of the opinion that the court was somewhat skeptical and was throwing out a marker in its dismissal opinion saying we're going to have to come
32 min of audioOral argument — Drimmer v. WD-40 Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2009
Then have to hire a cleaning person every week or have to, you know, in order to have a clean toilet. People might make that decision, and that was within the district court's discretion to do. … But he isn't asking, I don't think, to apply the laws of other states' consumer protection acts in other states. He's not asking that.
36 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.