Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Shannon Drake

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2023

And the key here are the facts, the overall facts over the prosecution that occurred over a two-and-a-half year period of time. First, the government misled not only Ms. … I would simply respond that there's been no showing that the government acted improperly or in bad faith in the handling of that witness.

Oral argument — Jeffrey Israelitt v. Enterprise Services LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2023

One thing I wanted to comment on, the Kramer case does not rely on statutory silence. That wasn't what the finding of that court was. … It's been almost ten years since the relevant time period.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Belmonte Cardozo

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2026

They seized the phone, and from a time period, took a month looking through it like in the Kolsue's case. … The enthroning comment that the government has put so much weight on is a passing comment in a section that's clearly about the First Amendment.

Oral argument — Calvin Hoagland v. David Bennett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2023

Now, that was at town council meetings of the town of Hilton Head Island during their public comment period. … And if the filing happens before his comments at the December 15th and January meeting, the suit can't be in response to that. That's just a matter of chronology, correct? Correct, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Caleigh Wood v. Evelyn Arnold

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2018

Violation of any one of these prongs renders the act unconstitutional. … And then it says period. It doesn't say stronger than the average Christian has faith in Christianity. Let me answer the question.

Oral argument — Derek LaMar v. Paul Ebert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016

Well, the substance of the Act adds up to a procedure under the Act that's impossibly onerous. That's the problem here, is that the substance of the Act forbids any retesting of DNA evidence. … That's why I legally can't even comment on whether this is a constitutional statute or not, because I'm not in a position. That would be just... Well, you can comment based on your research.

Oral argument — Neil Basta v. Novant Health Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2022

And that's not enough to state a claim under the Rehabilitation Act and the Affordable Care Act. When this court affirmed the decision... … Boss' counsel made at the court below is that for a very short period of time, the VRI device was blurry and choppy.

Oral argument — Belmora LLC v. Bayer Consumer Care AG

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2015

I know that the panel has just concentrated on Singer and I'll happily talk about the Singer line, but I would like to comment about the public use and their international Bancorp arguments and to a certain … Well, there has been tourism and telecommunications for the entire period of time of the Paris Convention.

Oral argument — Charles Harris v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2014

There's no way you could conduct the visual inspection for a period of years while this highly corroded rail rotted in the ground. … There's testimony that this area of the track was periodically cleared. I'm not aware of that, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Rayco Bethea

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

Well, he was still going to be incarcerated for a lengthy period of time, Your Honor. … And we sort of addressed that at the beginning, but any further comments on it that...

Oral argument — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2022

It says, the comment says, execution refers to the act of the receiving bank, in issuing a payment order, intended to carry out the payment order that the bank received. … When we couldn't deliver, we have told California throughout this period, if we can't deliver, we're going to refund the money.

Oral argument — Richard Tatum v. RJR Pension Investment Committ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

I'm – but I'm still very interested in having you respond to the first third of my comments. Go ahead. Well, Your Honor, this is not a question of semantics. … If you have some final comment or statement. I'm fine, Your Honor.

Oral argument — District of Columbia v. Donald Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2019

But as a general proposition, the notice of appeal puts the jurisdiction in the court of appeals, period. I would disagree respectfully with the period. … At Judge King's point of jurisdiction and the comments about gamesmanship and military tactics, that's what we face all the time with cases that come up here. You may have another motive.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Sanderson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2013

I'm not going to comment on the strength of what that argument would be, but it's certainly a fair argument. … So you're talking about a period of about 13 years. Mr. Jett pointed out we don't know of any other substantive offenses that he has committed.

Oral argument — United States v. Bruce Winston

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2016

The prior conduct here, it occurred at a different time period three years earlier. … Winston made so many cringeworthy comments, you know, in terms of, you know, just thinking as a prior attorney defending people, the number of comments that he made, false explanations, the shale energy

Oral argument — Hanes Caribe, Inc. v. Global Manufacturers

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2017

They occur, but they don't relate, they are not during the period of this contract. And in fact, I need to go back to that. … That's a you get in the Anti-Injunction Act type of thing.

Oral argument — Bradford Kendrick v. Carter Bank & Trust, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2025

And, yes, it was on PACER for a period of time, but they asked us to remove it. It was immediately removed. Exhibit one. … Number two, they raised the frequency of age-related comments that they say were pervasive in your bank.

Oral argument — Eileen McAfee v. Christine Boczar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2013

Briggs, the 1986 case, and specifically to the decisions or the comments made by Justice Powell. … And that goes directly to judge Duncan's comments about the constitutional right, the stake here and vindicating that value.

Oral argument — Jamila Grice v. Independent Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025

The statute can only apply in state court, period. How do you get to Erie from that? … The Supreme Court's kind of I call it throwaway language, just an offhand comment about its application.

Oral argument — Amr Fawzy v. Wauquiez Boats SNC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2017

And it was filed in the clerk's office, period. Correct. And restored. The court was opposed to a complaint that was not operative. Correct. I agree with you, Your Honor. Well, how can that be final? … I withdraw my comment. I don't want to bring that frivolously. Sure. Understood. I agree. Judge Niemeyer, I agree with you.