Documents

Oral argument — NAVAJO NATION v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2010

So there was a period from 1980 to 1988 when repair and replacement was part of the restriction. … Just a couple of comments. First, to the extent that the United States mentions the 1882 area, you know, that was a completely... That was an executive order area.

Oral argument — CREWZERS FIRE CREW TRANSPORT v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2013

Can you comment on that? Yes, Your Honor. In the Locke case, it's distinguishable from the case at issue here because that was a requirements contract. … Are those periods during the three-year period when we were unlawfully suspended? That's on A243.

Oral argument — McKinney v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2025

The APA says that they're supposed to act, right? It doesn't say that they have to act within a year or two years. But eight years is way beyond reason. … But then you have these effects that occur over a lengthy period of time.

Oral argument — Lakey-Scott v. Justice

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2006

And I point out, Your Honor, as part of our editorial comment on this, the agency didn't inform the board that they had done so. She informed the board. … In the Jones case, we had individuals who were suspended for a period of 14 months and they were later returned to duty.

Oral argument — Hi-Shear Technology v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2007

Should it be determined on the basis of the record, or include record with respect to the act, or if the act might be upon the civil act to be made in it prior to the conduct of the act. … Do you have any final comments? Your time is about expired. That concludes my comment. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you, Mr. Jones. Thank you, Mr. Austin. And that concludes our hearing.

Oral argument — RAYTHEON CO v. INDIGO SYSTEMS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2012

And again, you have to act reasonably when a reasonable person would believe there are facts on which they should investigate. And we think that's the standard under both. … Collins, do you have any brief comments on the choice of laws that relates to the cross-appeal? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

We also are taking the position that based on the spirit of the law in the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to separate-rate respondents, the statute encourages cooperation. … But all the individually calculated rates from all these periods are far lower than the 78 percent rate.

Oral argument — Net Talk.Com, Inc. v. magicJack VocalTec Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

And so instead of acting in good faith, they required us to get ready for these depositions, cancel them at the last moment, required us to prepare expert reports. … There was a period there. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you, counsel. Matter stands submitted.

Oral argument — AngioScore, Inc. v. TriReme Medical, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

I appreciate your Honor's comment. The same expert addressed the extent of competition between Angio score and Trireme in both cases. … The district court entered an order that said that my clients had acted diligently.

Oral argument — Laroche v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2009

And in 1994, they passed the Veterans Benefits Improvement Act, and that public law provided that in addition to actually filing with the clerk within the 120-day period, you could, by U.S. mail, send … your notice of appeal to the clerk within the 120-day period and the date on the envelope would serve as the date of actual filing of the appeal.

Oral argument — REALTIME DATA, LLC v. MORGAN STANLEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

The combination acts as a descriptor because the presence of a field indicated by the presence map and the template identified by the template identifier indicate how the field is encoded. … And actually, I'd like to start with that, since that was a nice, clean little piece that was discussed earlier. I'd like to respond to what Mr. Thomas said with regard to the timing.

Oral argument — REALTIME DATA LLC v. MORGAN STANLEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

The combination acts as a descriptor because the presence of a field indicated by the presence map and the template identified by the template identifier indicate how the field is encoded. … And actually, I'd like to start with that, since that was a nice, clean little piece that was discussed earlier. I'd like to respond to what Mr. Thomas said with regard to the timing.

Oral argument — Tehrani v. Hamilton Technologies LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2023

And finally, the Board acted fully appropriately in the implementation and management of all of its rules. With those three points, the final written decision should be affirmed. … So certainly his clinical experience in the relevant time period, when he was familiar with the ventilators, the automated ventilators that existed at the time, such as Andersons and Tao, qualified him

Oral argument — ANGELICA TEXTILE SERVICES v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2011

The error that ANGELICA is complaining about is the Department of Veterans Affairs not Before you get to that, maybe you can direct your comments then to this. I've got a concern about standing. … During that time period, Angelica was positioned to, was a potential bidder, in fact did bid and did win interim contracts.

Oral argument — Festo Corp v. SMC Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2007

And you had to show the equivalent acted in the same way to get the same result. … They said, and I think this was just Michelle's comment, that maybe if you only use one seal, it may not work as well, but it'll still work.

Oral argument — Acadia Technology Inc v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2006

Federal Tort Claims Act, we quoted the apt language. … One last comment. I was asked about Vereda. I just noticed, as opposing counsel was arguing, Vereda came out in 2001. Our goods were seized in 1997. It's great.

Oral argument — Depuy Spine v. Medtronic Sofamor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2009

I want to address the issues of ensnarement and some issues on pull-through, but I certainly want to respond to the comments concerning lost profits, and then I would like to have some comments on willful … They're what the machine acts on. But they could be obtained by anyone.

Oral argument — Mars v. Coin Acceptors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2008

It's their acts that were the acts that infringed this patent. And they don't change regardless. They were competing with MEI all along. He said statute of limitations. … I have no further comments to make at this time. If you have any further questions, I'd be pleased to try and answer. All right. Thank you very much. Thank you. Mel. Thank you, your honor.

Oral argument — Diamond Sawblades Manufacturer v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

And contrary to law also incorporates concepts of unreasonable decision making acting in an arbitrary capricious manner. … There was a point made, I think, by one of the lawyers who stood up for such a brief period, I barely remember, about how this is a matter on which the record could reasonably be viewed as having to be

Oral argument — Benitec Australia v. Nucleonics

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2006

This court has held that periods as short as nine months from coming up with something that would infringe are periods where you are not going to- But you're not accepting my hypothetical. … But an offer for sale is an infringing act. You're saying that until there's an infringing act, there can't be any declaratory judgment. That's not what the cases say.