Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

5.77s

  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Cohen v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1945

    C. 207). 10, 13, 14, 24 The Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 (54 Stat. 885, 50 U.S. C. … On appeal, after rehearing, the Circuit Court of Ap- peals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (R. 399-400).’

    323 U.S. 797
  • Opposition — Moran v. Virginia

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

    Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 T1570) ee eee ee OMe 10, 1l Rakas v. Illinois, Sue ems ae) UEe7O). 6 0 6 ee eee pe United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977) - . ° . . 7 . .* 11 pe Tk No. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51-52 (1970).

    454 U.S. 858
  • Opposition Brief — Costanzo v. Tillinghast

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1932

    .----_-- General Laws of Rhode Island, 1923, Chap. 399, Sec. 6... 127350—32 (1) % Sere? … (R. 24-26.)

    287 U.S. 341
  • Motion — Perkins v. Matthews

    Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1971

    Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 399 (1960) .................... 8 Louisiana v. United States, 380 U.S. 145 (1965) -.......... 10 STATUTES Miss. … Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 399 (1960), is no au- thority for the contentions of the Appellants.

    400 U.S. 379
  • Petition for Rehearing — New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Letitia James, Attorney General of New York

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Jan 10, 2025

    No. 24-161 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States __________ NEW YORK STATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., Petitioners, v. LETITIA A. … Law § 399-zzzzz(1)............................. 2 Sup. Ct.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Riverside

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    Leggett, 48 N.Y.2d 430, 399 N.E.2d 518, 423 N.Y.S.2d OND (EE na coc ck bids hob ekekeakiecatonsasnnes i2 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) ...........4-- 15 Williams v. … Alabama, 399 U.S. at 9.

    478 U.S. 1
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Konrad v. Michigan

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

    People v Burton, 429 Mich 133 (1987) People v Coles, 417 Mich 523 (1983) People v George, 399 Mich 638 (1977) People v Konrad, 439 Mich 947 (1992) Page 2 24 25 12,14 16 24 18 28 22 16 ames … People v George, 399 Mich 638 (1977) ;People v Phillips, 416 Mich 63 (1982).'

    506 U.S. 863
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Benjamin Dale Marshall, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 18, 2025

    Labs, 770 F.2d 399 (4th Cir. 1985). . . . . 5, 8 United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 (1977). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7, 8, 9 United States v. … Benjamin Dale Marshall, Case No. 24-3192, unpublished order, p. 3.

  • Opposition — Walker v. Newgent

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

    Nissan Motor Co., 399 F. Supp. 838 (S.D. Fla. 1975) 7 International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) 3, 6,8 Jetco Electronic Indus., Inc. v. … Nissan Motor Co., 399 F. Supp. 838, 849-50 (S.D. Fla. 1975); Crucible, Inc. v. Stora og parbergs Bergslags AB, 403 F. Supp, 9, 12-13 (W.D. Pa. 1975). See also Pr Promotions, Inc. v.

    441 U.S. 906
  • Reply Brief — James A. DeLanis, Petitioner v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 22, 2026

    FEC, No. 24-621, Pet. (Dec. 4, 2024), cert. granted, 145 S. Ct. 2843 (2025) ...................... 8 Richardson v. … App.24.

  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Howarth v. Howarth

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1948

    Op., Vol. 91, No. 6, pp. 399, 403; Williams v. No. Carolina, 317 U. S. 287, 302. ITI. … This Honorable Court has also granted certiorari on November 24, 1947, in Louis Kreiger v.

    333 U.S. 842
  • Petition — United States v. Nobles

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975

    United States, 360 U.S. 343__.......----- 24 People v. Damon, 24 N.Y. 2d 256; 247 N.E. 2d 651i, a inmtin 15, 17 People v. Sanders, 110 Ill. App. 2d 85, 249 N.E. 2d 124_ 15, 25 Raffel v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 85, 90 S.Ct. 1893, 26 L.Ed.2d 446 (1970). Id. at 1194. (Emphasis added).

    422 U.S. 225
  • Opposition Brief — Arizona v. Lucas

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

    ai y yop mshiyd sci : fs ae bd 3.43 ev ee 4s, P meee pds 24 No. 01-399 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STATE OF ARIZONA Petitioner, VS. DeANDRE LAVAR LUCAS, Respondent. … Be No. 01-399 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STATE OF ARIZONA, Petitioner, VS. DeANDRE LAVAR LUCAS, Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE I, Garrett W.

    534 U.S. 1014
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Leon C. Baker P. C. v. Lynch

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

    Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., 207 F.3d1126 (0 Cir. 20000 / ů ce eee eee renee 24 Clements v. Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey, 399 F.2d 825 (3d Cir. 1968) ) ꝰqu! … Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey, 399 F.2d 825 (3d Cir.1968).

    535 U.S. 987
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Albert Martinez, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 18, 2020

    Hudson, 430 P.2d 386 (N.M. 1967) ............................................ 24 State v. Office of Pub. Def. ex rel. … Ct. 399: whether use alone transforms any structure into the type of location protected by the generic crime of burglary. V.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Glenn Grothman, United States Congressman, et al., Applicants v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 9, 2022

    App. 6–7; Johnson, 399 Wis. 2d at 634, 638. … Johnson, 399 Wis. 2d at 666.

  • Opposition Brief — University of Pittsburgh v. Krynicky

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

    Tit. 24, §2510-2. The statutory language with respect to Pitt s identical, Pa. Stat. Ann. Tit. 24, §2510-202. … Tit. 24, §2510-9 and §2510-209.

    471 U.S. 1015
  • Reply Brief — Oakland Housing Authority v. Rucker

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001

    Central Trust Co., 193 U.S. 93, 24 S.Ct. 399, ee eS 7 Pee Kokkonen v. … Central Trust Co., 193 U.S. 93, 24 S.Ct. 399, 48 L.Ed. 629 (1904). Kokkonen, supra, 511 U.S. at 381-382, 114 S.Ct. at 1677. That is not the case here.

    534 U.S. 813
  • Appendix B — City of Santa Clarita, California v. Los Angeles County, California (No. 05-1462)

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix B · 2006

    City of Los Angeles, 288 F.3d 391, 399 (9th Cir.2002). … We therefore reverse the district court’s order and hold that the City is entitled to intervention as a matter of right under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 24(a).

  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Raphael v. Commissioner

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1943

    Com misstoner, 317 U.S. 399. 2 8 Metlink v. Unemployment Comm'n, 314 U.S. 564___- 8 North American Oil v. Burnet, 286 U.S 117 10 Old Colony R. Co. v. … Commissioner, 317 U.S. 399. It depended ‘‘on time”’ (Meilink v.

    320 U.S. 735

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.