Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.20s
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 27, 2017
The EPA can provide sources up to 3 years to comply with emission limits in the Clean Air Act (CAA) standards. FA lines initially were given 2 years to comply with the emission limits. … We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
82 FR 34858Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Washington
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 29, 1995
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA Region 10 has approved the following minor SIP revision requests under section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act (Act): ------------------------------------------------------- … The following sections of the state and local regulations and documents for the Washington State Implementation Plan for Air Quality, for compliance with requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act, have
60 FR 33734Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Colorado; Revisions to Colorado Procedural Rules and Common Provisions Regulation
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 2, 2026
The EPA is approving these SIP revisions because it has determined that they are in accordance with the requirements for SIP provisions under the Clean Air Act (CAA). … If adverse comments are received on this direct final rule, we will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
91 FR 41Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 16, 2017
EPA is approving this revision in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
82 FR 47985Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 7, 2017
Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2012 Annual Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). … Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or before September 22, 2016. EPA did not receive any comments, adverse or otherwise. II.
82 FR 16930Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 18, 2011
EPA received no comments on this notice of proposed rulemaking. II. What is the effect of this action? … This action, does not constitute a redesignation of the Charleston Area to attainment of the 24-hour 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
76 FR 71450Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 11, 1996
Background Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended (the Act), requires the EPA to promulgate criteria and procedures for demonstrating and ensuring conformity of Federal actions to an … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
61 FR 9642Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 28, 2004
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: This final rule is effective August 27, 2004. … or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
69 FR 44965Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 27, 2006
Request To Delete Forced-Air Check One commenter, the airplane manufacturer, requests that the forced-air check in paragraph (h) of the NPRM be deleted. … The commenter states that it is unsure that the forced-air check provides a benefit, and that there is a potential for damaging the air data equipment if the system were to be overpressurized during the
71 FR 4482Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Jun 20, 2011
SUMMARY: On June 12, 2008, EPA issued national emission standards for control of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) for the plating and polishing area source category under section 112 of the Clean Air Act … We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
76 FR 35744Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 20, 2007
EPA is approving this SIP revision in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on October 22, 2007. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 53686Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 31, 2006
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on May 1, 2006. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 16235Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 4, 2012
EPA is approving this revision in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
77 FR 71700Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 24, 2016
This final action pertains to the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2010 1-hour sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). … Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or before April 6, 2016. EPA received no adverse comments on the proposed action. II.
81 FR 32651Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 15, 2018
Air Act. … Air Act.
83 FR 11416Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 17, 2014
quality standards, reasonable further progress or any other requirement of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … The public comment period for these actions closed on January 29, 2014. See the Technical Support Document in the docket for this rulemaking and our proposal at 78 FR 79340 for more information.
79 FR 14611Environmental Protection AgencySignal and Train Control; Miscellaneous Amendments
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 28, 2001
apparatus) be governed by the air brake testing intervals established in 49 CFR 229.29 rather than the requirements of this section that required that inspection and cleaning at least once every 736 days … Although section 229.29 also requires a 736-day test interval, due to existing waivers, the testing and cleaning intervals for air brake systems and pneumatic systems on many locomotives do not coincide
66 FR 49556Transportation DepartmentFederal Railroad AdministrationApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan for Texas: Transportation Conformity Rule
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 8, 1999
We approve this SIP revision under sections 110(k) and 176 of the Clean Air Act (Act). We have given our rationale for approving this SIP revision in this action. … We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action.
64 FR 36790Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 23, 2018
The State of Utah submitted the Logan, UT-ID Moderate PM 2.5 state implementation plan (SIP) on December 16, 2014, to address the requirements under part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 22, 2019.
83 FR 59315Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 15, 2020
Air Act (CAA) section 112 and the residual risk and technology review of MATS) will be announced in a separate final action. … Air Act CEMS continuous emissions monitoring systems CFR Code of Federal Regulations CRA Congressional Review Act DSI dry sorbent injection EBCR eastern bituminous coal refuse ECMPS Emissions Collection
85 FR 20838Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.