Documents

Amendment to the Beef Promotion and Research Rules and Regulations-Final Rule

Federal Register · Rule · Aug 16, 2006

The two comments have been posted on AMS' Web site at http://www.ams.usda.gov/lsg/mpb/rp-beef.htm. The changes suggested by commenters are discussed below. … The Act provides that the assessment rate for live imported cattle be $1 per head. Consequently, this comment is not adopted.

Agency Information Collection Activities: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Demonstration Projects

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 8, 2024

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment on this proposed information collection. … All comments will be a matter of public record.

Privacy Act of 1974; Amendment of Existing System of Records; USDA/FS-26, Trespass and Claims

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 12, 2001

Although the Privacy Act only requires a Federal agency to solicit comments from the public with respect to changes in a system's routine use, the Department of Agriculture invites comments on all portions … Closed files are retained for the required retention period. Closed files are electronically scanned, and the information is retained on magnetic disk for the required retention period.

Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 23, 2008

themes; (2) a public hearing on the Lake Tahoe Federal Advisory Committees' SNPLMA Round 9 recommendations; and, (3) written public comment received during the comment period will be shared. … Issues may be brought to the attention of the Committee during the open public comment period at the meeting or by filing written statements with the secretary for the Committee before or after the meeting

Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Virginia State Technical Guide

Federal Register · Notice · Sep 26, 2011

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with this date of publication. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John A. … Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in Virginia regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of change will be made to the subject standards.

Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests; Apache, Coconino, Greenlee and Navajo Counties, Arizona; Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Public Motorized Travel Management Plan

Federal Register · Notice · Oct 2, 2017

An additional 45 day comment period will occur after the publication of the revised DEIS in the Federal Register . … Higgins, Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System. [FR Doc. 2017-21009 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3411-15-P

Olives Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate

Federal Register · Rule · Apr 26, 2002

The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the “Act.” … A 60-day comment period was provided for interested persons to respond to the interim final rule. The comment period ended on April 8, 2002, and no comments were received.

Invasive Plant Treatment Project-Ochoco and Deschutes National Forests; Oregon

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 23, 2004

The comment period on the draft EIS will end 45 days from the date the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register . … Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45-day comment period, so that substantive comments and objections are

Cranberries Grown in States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York; Revising Determination of Sales History

Federal Register · Rule · Aug 20, 2013

A 30-day comment period ending June 13, 2013, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received. … Also, a 30-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 929 Cranberries, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Expenses and Assessment Rate for Marketing Order Covering Olives Grown in California

Federal Register · Rule · Apr 22, 1996

That rule provided a 30-day comment period which ended March 21, 1996. No comments were received. … period, and no comments were received.

Expenses and Assessment Rate for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year for the Marketing Order Covering Cranberries Grown in States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York

Federal Register · Rule · Sep 28, 1995

An interim final rule regarding this action was published in the August 10, 1995, Federal Register (60 FR 40745), with a 30-day comment period ending September 11, 1995. … period; no comments were received.

Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado and Imported Irish Potatoes; Relaxation of the Handling Regulation for Area No. 2 and Import Regulations

Federal Register · Rule · Apr 22, 2015

A 60-day comment period ending December 5, 2014, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received. … Also, a 60-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule and no comments were received.

Olives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate

Federal Register · Rule · Apr 28, 2010

A 30-day comment period ending April 2, 2010, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received. … Also, a 30-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932 Olive, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Olives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 28, 1999

DATES: Comments must be received by March 1, 1999. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this rule. … A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule.

Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County, California; Increased Assessment Rate

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 16, 2004

DATES: Comments must be received by September 15, 2004. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this rule. … A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule.

Dried Prunes Produced in California; Increased Assessment Rate

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 7, 1998

DATES: Comments must be received by September 8, 1998. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this rule. … A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule.

Dried Prunes Produced in California; Decreased Assessment Rate

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 29, 1999

DATES: Comments must be received by August 30, 1999. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this rule. … A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule.

Pine Shoot Beetle; Additions to Quarantined Areas

Federal Register · Rule · Oct 3, 2006

We will consider comments we receive during the comment period for this interim rule (see DATES above). … After the comment period closes, we will publish another document in the Federal Register .

Regional Conservation Partnership Program

Federal Register · Rule · Feb 13, 2020

Comment date: Submit comments on or before April 13, 2020. … Effective Date, Notice and Comment, and Paperwork Reduction Act In general, the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking be published in the

Pork and Pork Products from Mexico Transiting the United States

Federal Register · Rule · Jun 14, 2000

We extended the comment period on our original proposal to allow the public enough time to comment on the amendment as it related to the proposed rule. … We received three comments on the proposed rule, all of which generally supported the rule. One of the commenters requested a change in the list of States, and one raised another issue.