Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.17s
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 5, 2002
The NAAMS Subcommittee will report to the Administrator of EPA through the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, a Federal advisory committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA … A public comment period on the proposed regulations will be announced at a later date by EPA's Office of Air and Radiation.
67 FR 67403Environmental Protection AgencyExportation of Live Animals, Hatching Eggs, and Animal Germplasm From the United States
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 20, 2016
Comments Regarding § 91.8 (“Rest, Feed, and Water Prior to Export”) In proposed § 91.8, we proposed that all livestock intended for export by air or sea would have to be allowed a period of at least 2 … One of the commenters suggested a 3 hour minimum rest period.
81 FR 2967Agriculture DepartmentAnimal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Jul 21, 2003
The intended effect of this rulemaking is to approve source-specific emission limitations required by the Clean Air Act. … What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements for NO X RACT?
68 FR 42981Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Oct 20, 2008
on clean air efforts. … provisions of the Clean Air Act. 7 7 42 U.S.C. 7506 Section 176(c).
73 FR 62362Transportation DepartmentFederal Highway AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Mar 26, 1999
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included Santa Barbara … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 14624Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 22, 1998
The intended effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 62 FR 52959 and 63 FR 15116. No comments were received. IV.
63 FR 33854Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 4, 2002
The proposed standards would implement section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) by requiring these operations to meet HAP emission standards reflecting the application of the maximum achievable control … The semiannual compliance reporting requirements may be satisfied by reports required under other parts of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
67 FR 72276Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for Alaska
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 22, 2006
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (“the Act”). … As required by section 328 of the Clean Air Act, this rule simply updates the existing OCS rules to make them consistent with current COA requirements.
71 FR 48879Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois; VOM Definition
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 20, 2015
for ozone under title I of the Clean Air Act (78 FR 9823). … ozone under title I of the Clean Air Act (78 FR 53029).
80 FR 9202Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 2, 2021
The EPA did not receive any comments during the comment period. III. … Air Act.
86 FR 49249Environmental Protection AgencyOpposition Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
Air Act. 1. … Naty ee Ow Ey ere oer 27 comment period (Min.
426 U.S. 941Federal Register · Rule · Jul 18, 1996
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the separate proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1), petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by
61 FR 37386Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for California
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 10, 2011
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (“the Act”). … Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to establish requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources located within 25 miles
76 FR 1389Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 12, 1996
In General Section 107(d)(4)(B) of the Clean Air Act sets out the general process by which areas were to be designated nonattainment for PM-10 upon enactment of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments ( … The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments became effective November 15, 1990.
61 FR 29667Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 22, 2003
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to find that the Phoenix metropolitan nonattainment area in Arizona has attained the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for carbon monoxide (CO) by its Clean Air Act … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
68 FR 55022Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 20, 2001
EPA is approving these revisions to establish RACT requirements in the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Air Act.
66 FR 43492Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 16, 2006
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 28290Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 1, 2009
EPA is proposing to approve these SIP revisions because they meet Clean Air Act requirements. … This action is being taken under sections 107, 110, and 175A of the Clean Air Act. DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 31, 2009.
74 FR 62717Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 13, 2004
EPA is approving these revisions to establish and impose RACT requirements in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 72115Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 12, 2020
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate
85 FR 27976Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.