Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.71s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 1, 2009
Section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to establish national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for both major and area sources of HAP that are listed for regulation … Section 112(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act gives the Administrator discretion to distinguish among classes, types, and sizes of sources in a category when establishing emissions standards under section 112
74 FR 26142Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 19, 1999
These SIP revisions were submitted to meet a requirement of section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 63206Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 13, 1996
Basis for the Interim Implementation Policy The EPA interprets the relevant portions of the Clean Air Act (Act) to provide that the general planning requirements of part A of title I and the basic … These existing regulations do not currently include the various changes enacted by Congress under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
61 FR 65752Interim Implementation Policy on New or Revised Ozone and ParticulateRuleMaintenance Plan and Redesignation Request; Nogales PM2.5 Planning Area; Arizona
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 2, 2022
The EPA is proposing these actions because this SIP revision meets the applicable Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”) requirements for maintenance plans and because the State has met the requirements under … Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, April 2019, available at https://www.epa.gov/scram/clean-air-act-permit-modeling-guidance. 96 EPA, 2011.
87 FR 11664Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Update To Include New York State Requirements
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 20, 2022
), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
87 FR 30849Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 31, 1996
On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. … ``State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (ACT) Deadlines,'' John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division, October 28, 1992. 10.
61 FR 3319Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 24, 2025
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 34790Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 12, 2017
This action is being taken in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. DATES: This final rule is effective on January 11, 2018. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 58342Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan; Minnesota
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 16, 1999
After review of the SIP revision request, EPA finds that Amendment Four meets the applicable requirements of Clean Air Act section 110(a) and that the revisions in Amendment Four have been shown to be … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 44408Environmental Protection AgencyApproval And Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Minnesota
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Apr 28, 1994
This revision was submitted to meet longstanding requirements as well as new requirements imposed by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. … These submittals were intended to satisfy both the requirements predating the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and the new requirements those amendments impose.
Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 21, 2000
SUMMARY: EPA publishes regulations under Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requiring states to submit plans to EPA. … Air Act.
65 FR 21361Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 9, 2015
This action is being taken in accordance with section 110 the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
80 FR 61112Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Nevada; Clark County Department of Environment and Sustainability
Federal Register · Rule · May 19, 2022
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no adverse comments. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
87 FR 30423Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Control of Emissions From Bakery Ovens
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 20, 2020
This removal does not have an adverse effect on air quality. The EPA's approval of this rule revision is in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … The NSR rules are contained in a separate portion of the Clean Air Act and work together with RACT rules, such as this one, to ensure the air quality goals of the Clean Air Act are met. IV.
85 FR 43695Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 31, 1998
The intended effect of finalizing this action is to regulate emissions of particulate matter (PM) in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 63 FR 6505. EPA received comment letters on the PR from two parties: ADEQ and the Hearth Products Association (HPA).
63 FR 15303Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 25, 2017
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 25, 2017. … Ambient air quality monitoring data for the three-year period must meet a data completeness requirement.
82 FR 19011Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 10, 2026
This final rule responds to a voluntary remand of the preceding rule for this source category and announces the results of the non-discretionary review at five-year intervals required by Clean Air Act … This requirement is in accordance with section 129(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act and applies instead of the schedule required in § 60.23(a)(1) of subpart B of this part.
91 FR 11802Environmental Protection AgencyNational Environmental Justice Advisory Council; Notification of Virtual Public Meeting
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 9, 2022
quality monitoring that provides greater protection, and clean and healthy air to environmental justice communities. … substances) Strategic Roadmap, and recommendations on community air quality monitoring that provides greater protection, and clean and healthy air to environmental justice communities.
87 FR 48478Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Oct 22, 2003
Sections 108 and 109 of the Clean Air Act require that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, where appropriate, of the air quality criteria and national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for … the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) of EPA's Science Advisory Board.
68 FR 60369Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 5, 1995
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted. (Pub. L. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q). … Air Act.
60 FR 34859Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.