Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

3.42s

  • Oral argument — State of Louisiana v. DOE

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023

    That's in reference to a comment raised by some of the joint commenters. So that's what's going on here. … your dishes or clean your clothes.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — State of California v. USEPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2020

    Are you suggesting that that's one of the equitable factors, the clean air? Certainly. Go ahead. … No, you think that the Clean Air Act's seeking to mitigate pollution, that's a factor that district court should consider under Rule 60B on whether or not to reconsider?

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sierra Club v. West Virginia DEP

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022

    But the Clean Water Act, as this court has held, is a strict liability statute. … There is no substantial compliance doctrine under the Clean Water Act.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Max Spatig

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2017

    General intent simply requires a volitional act, where specific intent requires something more. … It's that the defendant acted for a specific purpose, and there was no requirement in this statute that the defendant had to intend any result from his act of storing or disposing of the hazardous waste

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kathryn Spletstoser v. John Hyten

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2022

    The Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson testified that as a result of the investigation he was falsely accused. … So in the Lutz decision, we had, again, against the Air Force. We had an Air Force complaint. I know the facts of the Lutz case, but I'm asking you why.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sab Construction v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2006

    This case arose at Nellis Air Force Base. It involved the renovation of visiting airman's quarters in 1999. … I'm just talking of the additional work you incurred in cleaning the condition up. Let me put that in a very precise time perspective.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2018

    trash, rolling silverware, scrubbing walls, sweeping floors, restocking tuque oak supplies, cleaning booths, cleaning ramekins, and cleaning restrooms. … I don't think I'd want my waitress cleaning the bathrooms. I don't even want mine checking to see that the bathroom has been cleaned.

    67 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rebecca Towers v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

    The lower court aired when it made ultimate findings of fact as to foreseeability and as to reasonableness, both which this court has repeatedly held are questions of fact to be determined after discovery … And then, of course, the most important thing is because this was a criminal act by a guest, it's an intervening act under the law, they have to anticipate that because this person is intoxicated, that

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Wells v. BNSF Railway Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025

    There are several issues in this appeal, but the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act makes it the simplest to resolve. … Okay, so on the facts of that case, I don't know what time period Eddie encompassed.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 1-19-0317

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2020

    We never had a hearing on one comment. So now, as Mr. Chief said, I'm not anxious to continue to go through this case forever. … And the state never moved to enjoin further dumping during that period, correct? So the dump went from ground level to 85 feet up in the air without the state ever moving to stop the dumping.

    78 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Michael Alexander v. Express Energy Svc Oprt, L.P.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2015

    He cleaned part of the vessel. He helped put down the gangplank. He put down the gangplank on every occasion is his testimony. … I'd just like to make a few other comments. There was mention of the Wilcox case here, where the district court found an issue of material fact as to whether the plaintiff in Wilcox v.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Plastic-View Int'l Inc. v. Eastman Chemical Co.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2017

    And during the time he was serving our country, he realized that there was too much glare on these air traffic control towers. … As part of cleaning house in 2012, we were asking our distributors to tell us where their products were ending up on glass, in other words, to give us their customer lists.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Town of Harrietstown v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2026

    If the pollution is in the ground, they're obligated to clean it up. … What happens if there is a single paper, as we're calling it, that says there is pollution from a particular chemical, period, and it's known that that chemical is used in dealing with air crashes, but

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Ironhustler Excavating, Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2022

    He stated that not knowing the origin of the unclean construction material, Iron Hustler acted immediately anyway to clean up the site. … Iron Hustler acted quickly and swiftly because it wanted to see that the problem was cleaned up, regardless of who was responsible for it.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Barbre v. Barbre

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

    That triggers the discretionary provisions under the act which they cited being 511A. … Barbary filed for petition to modify shortly after the two-year period ran, which has to do with some child custody issues.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Rodney Davis

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2015

    It's too clean. That's suspicious. … So if he's sweating profusely without knowing what his metabolism is, he's been in air conditioned car walks a few feet, gets in another air conditioned car.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Texas

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2016

    One is what the court said is that under the Clean Air Act that Congress had charged the EPA with protecting states and others from the effects of air pollution and then given a specific cause of action … In addition, as General Verrilli has indicated, there was a procedural right within the Clean Air Act that does not exist here.

    92 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Rami Ghanem

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2024

    His offenses of conviction were not only the 2332-G for surface-to-air missiles. By the way, in that case, he was negotiating a deal for 800 surface-to-air missiles. … And that's something that was commented on by both the district courts.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — S Cal Alliance Treatment Works v. EPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2016

    Is that the only scenario in which SCAP can challenge EPA's interpretation of the Clean Water Act and its regulations? … Whether EPA has correctly interpreted the Clean Water Act and its regulations. At this point, in this context, no.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — DASS v. TOSCO

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2005

    I'm mindful of the court's comment earlier about time, and I will be brief. I would like to reserve a couple of minutes for rebuttal. … But also under the PMPA, every time your three-year renewal period comes up, you can change the terms.

    30 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.