Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

1,016 results

0.15s

  • Oral argument — Lusick v. Palakovich

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    The point that is made by HK and hers is that it's a specific denial of the very act to which she testified to in lockstep with her sister. … All right, period.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Johns

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    I don't recall ‑‑ I certainly didn't bring that up, and I don't recall the government having raised the issue that it wasn't allowed to make any comment at the second sentencing. … What our court had previously held was that Judge Sleet, under Rule 35, didn't have the jurisdictional ability to go back and re-sentence outside of a seven-day period.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Hines

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2010

    You can accept the police documentation facts as true, period. … I just want to make one last comment on this point, and that is about the risk of recidivism.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Miller v. County of Centre

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2017

    But that's the only act. The affidavit is the only act that's part of this complaint. I mean, the history is. … He repeatedly says in his public comment to the Commissioners asking for a special prosecutor to investigate District Attorney Parks Miller that these are allegations.

    55 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Thomas v. Horn Part I

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    If you hesitate for a period of time, you've refrained from acting during the period in which you're hesitating. Well, Your Honor, just in the same way. … hesitate from acting?

    73 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 21-1502_A.W. v. Princeton Public Schools

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2021

    Against Discrimination, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, shall terminate on June 30th, 2019. … So that's why the ALJ was like, made that comment on the record. And frankly, I don't think it's in their interest to blow this settlement up, to invalidate this settlement because of that.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Evansv.Warden Perry Phelps

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2012

    Ever since that time, parole was abolished for crimes after the effective date of the Truth in Sentencing Act. … I did not see that in the briefing, and I'm sure I can comment intelligently on that case. I'm hoping that it is a federal sentencing guideline case involving a— It's a good process. —by the U.S.

    18 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2016

    And that too is well within the period of time that would provide for relationship back for you. Yes, Mr. … In Weiss, that decision was made under the Fair Collection Debt Act when they were picking off the plaintiffs. It's a Rule 68 case.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 19_3903_USA v. Monte Barry

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2025

    And that's the one that says an omission can take the place of an act if there's either something clear in the statute or else there's a duty. … Your comment on that? My argument was that I think, and I'm sorry, I don't recall the breakdown of the cases. This is, again, where you sort of look to see how the state cases and the treatises.

    55 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re Columbia Laboratories, Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014

    And CNTR means something under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Sure. … The last one was on April 26, 2011, which is only five months into the 14-month class period.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Wrensford

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

    What was the coercive act of the court? Well, I think the calling of the safe bar and singling out that jury. … Your Honor, can you comment, if you would, with the scenario that we posed here, adversary, in which you assume for a moment that we rule that there's a de facto arrest.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Shuker v. Smith Nephew

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2017

    I think I can bring us back with that final comment. That helps me bring us back to what I think we ought to focus on, which is that the FDA doesn't regulate uses. … Also, the Act of Davis, that was submitted by your client, say that such an FDA should be marked as involved in a line item as well. Yes, sir.

    118 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pollara Group v. Ocean View Inv Holding

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2014

    Period. That's the whole theory. They're not saying we have a different theory, we are under a contract with them. Or that they're Southgate Development Group. … If we could just, you made a comment about the verdict sheet and the waiver, the failure to raise. Your adversary says it's a special verdict. Why is it a general verdict from your side?

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Norman v. Elkin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2017

    Is it your position that 220 acts officially as an automatic timeout no matter what? … We'll have a disposition for you in a relatively short period of time. Thank you. We'll take the matter under advisement.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mondelli v. Berkeley Heights Nursing

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2021

    Yeah Yeah put before the court I mean there are a number of letters and someone we're talking about, you know, he can't be Get his air conditioning removed because he has asthma and there were some others … thrust of the communication about the proof quote-unquote of His competency seemed to focus on the absence of independent evidence about the fan would alleged Incompetency declaration her honor makes no comments

    62 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ghanem v. Atty Gen USA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2021

    Attorney General, and we will begin with comments on Mr. Weaver. Good morning, Your Honors, and may it please the Court. My name is Will Weaver, representing Petitioner Adele Ghanem. … And again, that's circulated, as Judge Krauss pointed out, to all land, air, and sea ports in Yemen.

    68 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Singer Management Consultant v. Milgram enbanc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 24, 2011

    Judge Debevoise, after hearing argument, extended it beyond the statutory period to the entirety of the Hilton show. … Validity under the act or the same protections under the act as registered trademarks.

    62 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Montone,et al V.Cityof Jersey City,etal

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2012

    When you get to the other two people that Troy supposedly made these comments to, the reasons are given. … Chief Troy becomes the acting chief, and then the chief. It seems to me to be the right of hearing.

    62 min of audio
  • Oral argument — AARP v. EEOC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    The very first clause of Section IX says, it says pursuant to the notice and comment provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, the EEOC may do A and B. … In closing, I said incorporate that in my comment. Yes, Your Honor. I said incorporate that in my comment. And I still think that was the same one. In closing, let me just, the Bray v.

    56 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gonzalez v. Homeland Security

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2011

    It only acts as a limitation on the Attorney General? That's quite correct, Your Honor. Okay. … Gonzalez presented no evidence to rebut anything other than self-serving comments.

    37 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.