Documents

Oral argument — Hubble v. SSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008

I just have one comment left on the credibility issue, and that it just appears that, you know, with the concession that the ALJ aired in discrediting her, the basis on which she discredited her, it looks … The question here is – the broader question here is whether she meets the criteria for disability under the Social Security Act. But for a larger than a five-month period.

Oral argument — Dianne LeSuer v. HCA Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 30, 2010

And the flagrant, one of the examples given in the body was a time period for making a decision that was far outside the bounds of what was required either under the Act, which is 90 days, 245-day periods … With respect to the comments that were made about the consideration of evidence provided by the claimant here, the evidence she provided regarding her treatment after the waiting period, so the period

Oral argument — United States v. LATU

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2006

But assuming that he sort of keeps his nose clean, and the only thing that he's done that's, quote, bad is that he's overstayed his nonimmigrant visa. … , that the period has elapsed, and that the Petitioner is still in this country.

Oral argument — United States v. Orlee Lumiguid

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2012

And causing an act to be done. … And she commented how she wouldn't do this if she were at cell and they should be providing more training.

Oral argument — United States v. Hakop Gambaryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2016

And those were all comments in response to defense counsel saying that we had not proved by clear and convincing. … I believe since January of 2011, the amount is now billed over a 13-month period.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Carroll

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2015

His offense conduct exploiting children was egregious and long term in terms of child pornography and for a period of 40 years he was engaged in hands-on generational abuse to siblings. … No we chose not to do it just to keep the record clean and quite honestly we didn't know the extent of it before the trial.

Oral argument — Fox Television Stations, Inc v. Aereokiller, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2016

For purposes of the 76 Act. Why couldn't it be? … There was express comment periods given. This is all put at the start of the 2004 and 2008 reports.

Oral argument — Abby Rios v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2018

Wagner, as he goes down the next aisle and is cleaning another aisle, this is the — how in the world could a working man who's cleaning a shop in one aisle know that a sippy cup was spilled — By coming … And in fact, if you look at jury instruction number 16, law does not say how a reasonable person would act under the circumstances. That is for you to decide, and then jury.

Oral argument — United States v. Cherie Dillon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

And, I mean, it's as simple of a matter of that contract dentist, when she's assisting in drilling and filling, as they say, this patient needs to have his or her teeth cleaned. … And then they are absolutely dentists, and they are acting to help Dr. Fricke, sometimes every other Friday, sometimes every third Friday. For some of them, for a period of time, it was every Friday.

Oral argument — United States v. Devaughn Dorsey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2009

First, that there was a clean break in the questioning. Second, that the agents left the room. … That comment was made to Detective Kazner. And I would submit that that comment of when are they coming back is a routine question.

Oral argument — Re: Pro Air Inc, Steinberg v. Wembley LTD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2007

I think that's a logical comment. No, and that's my second point. I think the first point is that the contract language is clear. You can read it. … And what the defendants would ignore throughout their briefing and their argument is that Pro Air, in fact, received $10 million in loans by pledging the Gundle shares over a several-year period, shares

Oral argument — United States v. Meza Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

Yes, but I think 640 and the way that the guidelines were promulgated and issued became the force of law during that period of time. Your time's up. We'll hear from the government. Okay. Thank you. … So it's a little bit difficult to put this burden on him, knowing his intellectual makeup and the fact that he had said he'd come clean a number of times and the judge said, yes, I've got these other concerns

Oral argument — Textainer Partnershi v. TCC Equipment Income

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008

The district court decided to apply the Reform Act heightened pleading standard in this case to a Section 14a claim, and if it weren't for the title of that section of the Reform Act, there really wouldn't … The text of Section 21dB, which is the heightened pleading standard provision of the 34 Act, says that it applies to every private action arising under the 34 Act, which alleges an untrue statement of

Oral argument — Kava Holdings, LLC v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2022

And viewed retrospectively, throughout that period of time, the owner of the business was doing his best to drum up new business so he could reopen. … First of all, that argument is not before the court, and the court, in fact, does not have jurisdiction to consider the argument under Section 10e of the Act because the employer did not raise it before

Oral argument — Aaron Leigh-Pink v. Rio Properties, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

Don't you think that they also bargained for clean amenities and clean gym and not, I mean, bring it into COVID, I hate to even bring it into COVID times, but if you hadn't have disclosed that you'd had … The court has to be somewhat flexible in going back to what Judge Gould prefaced his comments about. It's a murky sea. And so this isn't math. One plus one equals two when it comes to damages.

Oral argument — United States v. Ross

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2004

The question, though, is it possible to form a reasonable suspicion based on the acts we've had? And I think we clearly have that here. … When the plates come back clean? Everything's clean. I guess I'm stunned by that, that the United States would go there. You're drawing lightning bolts. Well, all right. And plus the broken window.

Oral argument — Merklin v. Liberty Life

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2004

No, it was September 98 through November 98 was the period. Right. The 18-month period during which they questioned whether it was – could have been one or the other. … Massey came back and he commented on issues he wasn't even asked to comment on. That's why his report was criticized. They didn't ask him to talk about the psychiatric issue.

Oral argument — Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2017

That's a little bit of time whether from the comments to Rule 41B that that seven-day claim period is important. … The comments, the 2002 comments, stress that the lady issued is to mandate nine days or more. The process is human-oriented procedures. I don't see how that could apply.

Oral argument — Irvine Leen v. Harold Thomas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

Apparently there was some criminal proceedings because the gentleman was cleaning the ditch. Yes, Your Honor. … How do you get charged criminally for cleaning your own ditch? I don't understand. Yes, Your Honor. It was a, Mr. Lean and a, and a tenant on his property were cleaning the ditch during the summer.

Oral argument — San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2011

You know, they can just suck air. That's too bad because the statute gives us this priority. Is that a correct interpretation of the district court's ruling? … But we know that some of the things in the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act will overlap with that.