Documents

Oral argument — Judith Mottle Kerr Trust v. Holm

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2017

4 of the Fence Act. … I guess what I would like to do is initially begin on some of the comments that were presented here today and respond to Mr. Carroll's comments about the Fence Act and the like.

Oral argument — Passafiume v. Jurak

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

But briefly, I just want to comment on the appropriate standard of review. … Many of us have lived through higher interest periods than 2-3%. And those on the jury did likewise. And in their wisdom, they didn't have to accept that very conservative estimate on Dr.

Oral argument — Cronholm v. Board of Trustees of the Lockport Township FPD Firefighters' Pension Fund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

He wants to keep both sides of the seesaw up in the air. The Court should overrule Cronholm's objections to the Lockport Fund's correction and affirm its decision for at least the following reasons. … He can't surmount the fact that the statute of limitations does not apply to governmental entities like the Lockport Fund acting in its public capacity.

Oral argument — People v. Schiller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2012

And if the claim is a clean claim, it comes back here and there's nothing more. The case is over. But if he doesn't offer more, then obviously the familial should have accused himself at that point. … That's an appearance of impropriety that deserves some comment, some response from the judge. But nobody requested any comment?

Oral argument — Napcor Corporation v. JPMorgan Chase Kane Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2010

Janke to act. The bank doesn't dispute any of those facts, and they're not an issue on their appeal here today. … Some of the first problems occur within a short period of time, over a 10-year span, a short period of time with that first, I think, blow-off, and then there were some other blow-offs.

Oral argument — Hanagan v. Hanagan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2013

Now, the significance of that period was explained by Steve in the colloquy which we reproduced in our brief. … Acts which were found to be constituting the contempt and admitting that he was in contempt. We never admitted that we understood that we were committing a contemptuous act. We never admitted that.

Oral argument — People v. Parker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2013

They didn't prove necessary below, and they admit that it was unnecessary in their brief, in their plain air argument. … Very quickly, with regard to the third issue, in this case, the court imposed consecutive sentences without comment.

Oral argument — Adoption of G.T.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2025

After the birth, the parties engaged in a relationship for a period of time. During that period of time, my client purported himself and carried on as the father of this child for a period of time. … Section 7 of the Adoption Act deals with process in adoption cases.

Oral argument — Hill v. DePaul University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 20, 2024

You know, I should comment very, very quickly, whoever drafted this complaint. Our Code of Civil Procedure requires a specific period for relief after each count. … I'm going to ask you to comment on a phrase from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal.

Oral argument — Menard v. Threlkeld

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2010

So when he has them, he has them personally, and at the point he's acting as his own attorney, he still does not have any duty to respond? … Just the fact that – Just the fact that – Cleaning? Mm-hmm. Filing? Yes. Nothing or an argument was made to the trial court? No.

Oral argument — Marriage of Leitzen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

Certainly, our legislature would have included provisions within the very specific section of 5032 of the act if this were intended. … Secondly, this court's already commented on the fact, and this was raised at trial, what did Mr. Leitzen give up?

Oral argument — Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2017

Count 2 was a claim for violation of Illinois' Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Count 4 was for violation of the Federal Magnuson Moss Act. … It dealt with an air show, I think, in the McLean County area. But the converse is also true, Your Honor. There is no case which prohibits it.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Fromm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2010

As our position of the trial court in its decisional judgment, there are three issues in which are aired. … Under 503, under the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, there are 12 factors to determine the property and debt distribution.

Oral argument — People v. Yarbrough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2023

He was told that the MSR period could extend to a period of his natural life, and above that, that there would be requirements necessary to secure that. … Because there's no air anywhere in the court proceedings, and defendant's decision to reject such a plea agreement can't be said to be rational, it's the state's position that on those two bases, really

Oral argument — People v. Reyna

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2009

And you can't really expect a defendant who's untrained in the law, a layperson, to go out and search for acts of ineffectiveness, to identify acts of ineffectiveness. … So it seems to me, based upon a plein air argument, first of all, this is discretion, a discretionary finding at that time, and the record fully supports it.

Oral argument — Coppert v. Cassens Transport Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2014

Well, I think the transcending thing, do you want to comment on, obviously, the overarching issue is the propriety of the trial court's granting of the summons? … I mean, didn't the court kind of pick this number out of thin air, 3,500? It must have because it didn't come from us. Right. It didn't come from anywhere.

Oral argument — Stanly v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2016

And as the commission and courts have ruled many times and found many times, an aggravation of an underlying condition is compensable under the Act. … We paid for the surgical treatments, even though in the surgery, they did some cleaning up, but there was no significant injury to the knee that was noted in any of the findings.

Oral argument — Torres v. Peoria Park District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 31, 2024

And these air fat questions. This is a summary judgment case. These air fat questions. They have to be strictly construed against the defendant. … These air back questions that the facts are not in dispute.

Oral argument — People v. Fields

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2022

without its constitutionality becoming suspect with a strict liability version of the foyd act absolutely raises both second and fifth amendment concerns a non-strict liability of the foyd act still has … of time for early stage alzheimer's a week later with a clean bill of health doesn't uh uh report it uh uh and she doesn't set up a forwarding address uh uh uh that's a second part of this and uh the

Oral argument — People v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2016

Counsel's point, which I did not adequately address in my brief as to the, well, first of all, counsel's argument as to the second comment, the argument that he makes on page 22 of his brief, the comment … She's being charged with stopping him from an authorized act. The authorized act is an investigation, and that's what she's saying.