Documents

Oral argument — Truth In Bible Club v. Kent School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2006

And we have a situation before the court where the ASB counsel, over a period of time, considered this club and its various permutations at least six times and voted on it three times and turned it down … on that point, that there are either charters or constitutions that set forth some sort of mission statement or criteria that says what the purposes are and that we want people who want to believe in cleaning

Oral argument — Smolucha v. PSNERGY, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2025

readings that were taken the final readings that are taken after tuning that occurs at the very end of the uh the chemical reaction before it enters the elbow shaped exhaust stack goes up hits the dilution period … understand this is a de novo review but i agree that it's the appropriate analysis and i would kindly ask this honorable panel to take it into consideration you can't talk about breach without duty an act

Oral argument — Safarian v. American DG Energy Inc v. Multiservice Power Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2015

Multi-service employment with ADG ceased for that two-month period? It did, Judge. Who paid him while he was in Russia? His Russian employer, Judge. Not multi-service? … Safarian fixing, putting in an air conditioning unit for his pastor. The definition is suffer or commit to work, Judge.

Oral argument — People v. Villavicencio-Serna

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2014

Then isn't that a waiver of the air? If you invite playing of all of her statements, can you complain later? They shouldn't have been played. … Because the defense wanted to make reasonable inferences as to coercion and threatening by showing the long periods while the witness was in the room.

Oral argument — Expo Properties, LLC v. Experient, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2020

You get a benefit in the fact that you can charge future additional tenants a whole lot more rent by virtue of that air conditioning system and the like. … That is merely confirmation of what has been happening for the entire 20-year period of the lease, whether the tenant was originally Galaxy, whether the tenant was Experient, or whether it was Experient

Oral argument — LEADER TECH v. FACEBOOK

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2012

December 8th, that's two days before the critical date, within the time period when even under Mr. … The claim says a computer-implemented method of managing data comprising computer-executable acts. The key phrase, it seems to me, is computer-executable acts, which comes after the word comprising.

Oral argument — Towery v. Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2012

The court noted that when determining whether or not there is mitigation, the significant moment in time is the time at which the criminal acts are committed. … And Arizona courts have never given much weight to difficult childhoods when there's a significant time period between the crime and the defendant, the end of the defendant's childhood.

Oral argument — Smith v. Stone

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2012

What it does establish, due to the way he acted and the way he walked and talked, he was definitely impaired. … And Judge Wexler indicated that it may have been air, but perhaps not reversible air. It is the whole issue of this lawsuit.

Oral argument — Julie Gleason v. Markel American Ins Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

I believe the Court has to address two issues, and if the Court agrees with the appellant, there's also a cross-appeal by Markel that I will address, of course, in my initial comments, if there are any … So the question becomes, is it — I want to bring everything to the district court's attention to clean everything up before it comes here, but in — in essence, we could have been here in the first instance

Oral argument — American Coal Company v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2018

Wirtz, I should comment, by the way. Yes. When you prepare an appendix, you should really review it first, because you only gave us two pages of the arbitrator's decision. … I just like to breathe the rarefied air. Yes. May it please the Court. Mr. Wirtz, my name is Bruce Wirtz, and I represent Jimmy Boatwright.

Oral argument — Abdulrafi v. Lockyer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2006

The actual acts as charged, as admitted by the prosecutor in his closing, are minimal. The other act's evidence is very, very serious. … You heard counsel's comment that even though we don't second-guess strategy, the strategy has to be reasonable. What's your response? Well, Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Joshua Stafford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2015

I think it's fair to say that the air was thick with anti-government and revolutionary talk that night. There was a little less of a tie between Stafford and that aspect. … The Occupy comments don't add too much one way or the other.

Oral argument — Jo Ann Howard & Associates v. National City Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2021

And all the Missouri Supreme Court in Clayton did was comment that those cases were in existence and let them stand. … Unless the court has any more questions, I have no further comments. Very well. Thank you for your argument. Mr. Riley? Mr. Bennett, we'll hear from you in Rebella.

Oral argument — Spence v. GATX Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2010

McFedrinan Yes, Your Honor May it please the court, counsel, for the record, my name is Attorney James McFedrinan of the Clean Associates in Peru. … It was sort of an offhand comment.

Oral argument — United States v. Zeljko Boskovic

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2012

Boscovich acted on that motive or whether he was actually answering questions the way he understood them. But I think we have evidence in the case. … But I understand Your Honor's comments. Would Your Honor's like me to address the third and fourth prongs of the plain error test with respect to the comments?

Oral argument — Kloeckner v. Solis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2012

Suppose the Civil Service Reform Act had said nothing at all about suits under the Civil Rights Act, under the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, and so forth. What would the situation be? … In the case of a prisoner's case, those time periods are relevant to the MSPB. And there are also time periods relevant to filing a complaint at the agency level.

Oral argument — Rinat Akhmetshin v. William Browder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2026

I have two tweets, a Business Insider comment and a CBS comment. Are those after Mr. Akhmat Zinni has weighed in on the statute? They are after Mr. … It's Burke against, and I think it's Air Services, but the citation is 685 Federal Reporter 3rd, and the Penn site I was discussing is 1108.

Oral argument — Cook County, Illinois v. Chad F. Wolf

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2020

One thing of the fact that one provision of the 1882 Act established the public charge exclusion while a different provision of the 1882 Act created an immigrant fund to provide for immigrants who fell … How do you suppose someone who is a public charge was different than someone who is a pauper in the 1907 Immigration Act? In the 1907 Act, pauper and public charge certainly do have overlap.

Oral argument — United States v. Sc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2019

This is not something that's conjured up out of thin air. I mean, you have the affirmative statement by the highest court of New York. … They found passive omission of an act. I don't think they found intent.

Oral argument — Encompass Off Solutions, Inc. v. Louisiana Hlth Sv

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018

I mean, if I call somebody, you know, if an air conditioner fellow has done repairs at my house and I don't think the repairs are good, and then I try to call him two or three times and he doesn't answer … If the one-year prescriptive period runs from the date of the letter or three days later when Encompass knew of it, then that same prescriptive period equally applies to the defamation claim.