Documents

Oral argument — Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2015

They just basically made the countries up out of thin air within a GNI ban that was never explained. … Which was only one of the many categories that were at issue in the period of review, right? It is one of the various categories, Your Honor.

Oral argument — People v. Macedo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2023

This is not a case where the trial court said, I'm going to keep this witness clean. I'm not going to allow any impeachment of him. … Counsel's response is that it was only his thoughts, he never acted on those thoughts. There's no proof that he ever acted on them. Well, the State never had a chance to cross-examine him on that.

Oral argument — United States v. Kevin Shibilski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2024

They can't even get close to getting around plain air on that. … Judge Peterson's jaw dropped, and he makes the comment, you know, no reasonable person sitting in this courtroom would have believed that this man accepted responsibility.

Oral argument — The Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic v. Baldwin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2026

And he says we start from a clean slate. And Judge Miller writes that under the Federal Arbitration Act, we must look at Section 207 to determine what is its actual meaning. … It is there that the court is saying they didn't make a non-frivolous act.

Oral argument — Jose Hernandez v. Results Staffing, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016

There's one district court case where the district court in Jordan air- If 4311 were the only issue before McBride. Yes. I think I'm right, but disagree with me. … At that point, 4311 takes over, 4311 being wrongful termination, acts of reprisal, things that happen after the employment occur. So that would suggest we're in the world of 4312.

Oral argument — Riensche v. Cingular Wireless LL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2009

You just want us to send it back, period? Right. I think that the basis for the judge's dismissal is that there was no deceptive act, prong number one under the Consumer Protection Act. … air at all in Washington.

Oral argument — Alvarenga v. Attorney General USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2022

You know, he pulls things out of the air. But to my mind, he's got some pretty strong things in here that support his conclusion. … Bowerman also talks about how fleeing can be considered an antagonistic act by the gangs.

Oral argument — Tamesha Means v. US Conf of Catholic Bishops etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2016

Lattenberger, are only three of many individuals who served as members of Catholic Health Ministries over a period of time. … And the act of negligence, according to plaintiff, is as follows.

Oral argument — Glenda Palmer v. Preston Gamblin

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2014

Kentucky Department of Corrections found that a prisoner's complaint of a risk to his life was enough to create the duty to act. And Gamblin did not do the proper duty to act. … Without that, you have what used to be, you know, remember, negligence in the air. If no damage has occurred, negligence is not a consequence.

Oral argument — Coinbase INC v. United States Securitiesand Exchange Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024

I mean, their best arguments, to put air quotes around that, are first, we don't have to make our rules workable. … And so, as I said, it's the SEC that has claimed that it has acted by rules.

Oral argument — Richard Bays v. Warden Chillicothe Correction

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019

He is voluntarily, very calmly, the officers testified he was not acting nervous. He was acting calm. He is in his mid-20s. It was a short interview. He was not deprived of any food or water. … If I can just ask you, did Bay's offer the comments about the victim's wallet?

Oral argument — United States v. Hagen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2022

A short period of time, frankly. Yes, I mean this... … But he was clear in saying that, because he was asked, and he said he did not provide advice or comments on those contracts.

Oral argument — Shelly Weiner v. Carolyn Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015

Wiener's functioning during the relevant time period. … He was essentially acted as a medical expert. Was he a physician or a psychologist? I believe he was a psychologist. He was a psychologist. I believe he was a Ph.D.

Oral argument — Jones-Richard v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2019

Now, the right knee, there were complaints periodically of the right knee and of the feet. … So, is there anything other than a ministerial act to be done here? Because if there is, we don't have jurisdiction.

Oral argument — Lisa Milice v. CPSC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2021

She doesn't do so until after the comment period has expired and the regulation is now effective. We're here, Your Honor. I'd note that during the comment period, Ms. … comment period that there were no adverse comments and the rule would take effect.

Oral argument — Larry Newkirk v. Conagra Foods Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2011

He does not read to me like a neutral doctor acting as an expert. Now, that may be a question of tone rather than use of data. But I have to say it was an odd form of expert report. Dr. … The question here is, was there enough exposure over a sustained period at a high enough concentration for it to have happened to be the causative factor in this case?

Oral argument — Heiden v. Trujillo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2006

Thank you for your comments. Your time has expired. May it please the Court. My name is Carla Hodes DeLore. I'm an assistant attorney general from Arizona representing the respondents. Ms. … When he presented his issue to the Court of Appeals that the trial court aired in precluding his expert testimony, he presented it as a state evidentiary issue.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Martinovich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2015

And those comments are also important because he's talking about the history of the guidelines. He references the Crime Control Act. … With regard to the comments, she . . . Ms.

Oral argument — United States v. Mark James

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2015

The government's point during these isolated comments. What is that? … A prosecutor pulled something out of the air that had never been discussed, and there was no evidence to that effect.

Oral argument — In re Custody of C.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2013

And again, at that point, our second argument, which related to the child support, would only be for the interim period when we had overlapping fathers. … One way or the other, that would have gotten cleaned up, and I wouldn't be wasting this court's time on that.