Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.34s

  • Oral argument — Vivine Wang v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2011

    was observable, and it wasn't a single purchase, it was five purchases over that period of time. … And you wait until the air clears, the class actions get decided. If Bear Stearns wins and there was no fraud, road is clear.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Consolidation Coalv.Director Owcp USDeptof Labor

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2011

    Parker's opinion, this man has asthma because his ventilatory studies show, on the administration of bronchodilator drugs, that he gets better air out of his lungs. … The other physicians are too accommodating to the act.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re Macor

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2018

    You're saying that it was air for the examiner not to enter the amendments and consider the patentability of those claims? Absolutely, Your Honor. … And every single embodiment of DeFabio, every claim of DeFabio requires, as an element, that someone sign and it be videoed or imaged, period.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dina Abdurahman v. Prospect CCM C

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2021

    So you've got an individual acting on behalf of the signatory, Prospect Health Access Network, that is controlling her obligations. … Lantus will have lots of work for himself for cleaning that up, right, that there's some work to be done on that. But we can't.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — James Lane v. John Anderson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2016

    He says, your comments were intended to derail an internal investigation about an important matter. … Under Title VII, under Title II of the ADA, under the Rehab Act, there's never any dispute there.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Maldonado-Maldonado

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026

    The purpose of that remedy was to provide a clean slate before a judge untainted by the breach. … And I assume, acting in good faith, that would continue to be your position on remand. That is correct. Okay.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Coronado

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2026

    There is sort of a buffer period, I would submit to the court, that a reasonable person would understand. And in this case, the gun was seized within 20 minutes. … It's a clean legal issue, Your Honor.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Anders Rydholm v. Experian Information Solutions

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2022

    Demetrius, when the lectern is cleaned, you may proceed. Good morning, your honors. May it please the court, I'm Camille Nicodemus. You can lower that podium. There's a button there. … Rios pointed out in the other case, it has worked extremely well for a very long period of time. This is a reasonable procedure because it's based in logic. It minimizes error.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Daiichi Sankyo v. Apotex

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2010

    The U.S. patent attorney's file was clean. There was nothing in it other than the patent. They destroyed it as part of their policy. … I mean, what was the- But the court said, we don't reach these issues, period. That was it. The court did not say it was moot.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Barber v. . G.J. Partners

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

    And the blade that was used to clean off the parking lot, I presume, is flat, like they, I mean, I think common sense are. Yes. Why isn't Council right? … Is the duty higher if it's next to the entrance, or is there a duty, period? Does it make any difference that the gas station had cones, which they filled to use?

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rabinowitz v. Paul Revere

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2004

    It doesn't say that they have to act. But I think Judge Wardle's question is, why do we have to declare any part of the policy invalid? Why? … He was in and out for a period of time. He was paid during that time period. But what has happened is that that treatment was good for a while.

    56 min of audio
  • Oral argument — MillerCoors LLC v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2019

    And the court acted with respect to some and didn't act with respect to others. … If I could just add a couple of comments on that point, it would be helpful if you all would address Section 3921.2 of Wright and Miller, which talks about this in some detail.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — American Clinical Laboratory Association v. Alex Michael Azar, II, In His Official Capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2019

    Congress set forth two distinct acts. The first act was to promulgate, after notice and comment, with different language, the parameters for data collection. … No, but if it adopted a time period where everyone knew, and it's notice and comment. Everyone's told the secretary, don't do a five-day time period.

    56 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gary B v. Gretchen Whitmer

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2019

    We should not have substitutes for long periods of time. … I'm struggling with the idea that 20 years of moving in and out and taking and exercising control, sometimes by public acts that referendums took away and then new public acts were replaced, and they enabled

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ortiz v. The City of New York

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2021

    And after the first, she made the following comment, which I think drives this discussion. She said, you know, she's calculating the time. … The court here acted well within its broad discretion in applying the relevant legal standards and conducted the case-specific analysis.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — GW Acquisition Co., LLC v. Pageland Limited Liability Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2025

    Brower's own acts and deeds show that the exclusivity provision was of no moment to him. … It's not something that could be acted upon. But Your Honors don't even need to consider that, because Mr.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Macedo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2023

    This is not a case where the trial court said, I'm going to keep this witness clean. I'm not going to allow any impeachment of him. … Counsel's response is that it was only his thoughts, he never acted on those thoughts. There's no proof that he ever acted on them. Well, the State never had a chance to cross-examine him on that.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Memphis A Phillip Randolph Institute v. Tre Hargett

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2020

    And on the merits, you cannot find that the district court plainly aired clear abuses discretion or clearly aired. … Indeed, they were required after this injunction to provide identification through the mail as the Help America Vote Act requires.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jespersen v. Colony Insurance Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023

    I think the only way that that would happen is sort of the Mooney case in New Hampshire where the insurance company goes after the insured who acts fraudulently or acts in some way, and they would be recovering … If I can just have one other comment here.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Kevin Shibilski

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2024

    They can't even get close to getting around plain air on that. … Judge Peterson's jaw dropped, and he makes the comment, you know, no reasonable person sitting in this courtroom would have believed that this man accepted responsibility.

    33 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.