Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.34s
Oral argument — Vivine Wang v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2011
was observable, and it wasn't a single purchase, it was five purchases over that period of time. … And you wait until the air clears, the class actions get decided. If Bear Stearns wins and there was no fraud, road is clear.
30 min of audioOral argument — Consolidation Coalv.Director Owcp USDeptof Labor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2011
Parker's opinion, this man has asthma because his ventilatory studies show, on the administration of bronchodilator drugs, that he gets better air out of his lungs. … The other physicians are too accommodating to the act.
27 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2018
You're saying that it was air for the examiner not to enter the amendments and consider the patentability of those claims? Absolutely, Your Honor. … And every single embodiment of DeFabio, every claim of DeFabio requires, as an element, that someone sign and it be videoed or imaged, period.
24 min of audioOral argument — Dina Abdurahman v. Prospect CCM C
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2021
So you've got an individual acting on behalf of the signatory, Prospect Health Access Network, that is controlling her obligations. … Lantus will have lots of work for himself for cleaning that up, right, that there's some work to be done on that. But we can't.
38 min of audioOral argument — James Lane v. John Anderson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2016
He says, your comments were intended to derail an internal investigation about an important matter. … Under Title VII, under Title II of the ADA, under the Rehab Act, there's never any dispute there.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Maldonado-Maldonado
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026
The purpose of that remedy was to provide a clean slate before a judge untainted by the breach. … And I assume, acting in good faith, that would continue to be your position on remand. That is correct. Okay.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Coronado
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2026
There is sort of a buffer period, I would submit to the court, that a reasonable person would understand. And in this case, the gun was seized within 20 minutes. … It's a clean legal issue, Your Honor.
32 min of audioOral argument — Anders Rydholm v. Experian Information Solutions
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2022
Demetrius, when the lectern is cleaned, you may proceed. Good morning, your honors. May it please the court, I'm Camille Nicodemus. You can lower that podium. There's a button there. … Rios pointed out in the other case, it has worked extremely well for a very long period of time. This is a reasonable procedure because it's based in logic. It minimizes error.
34 min of audioOral argument — Daiichi Sankyo v. Apotex
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2010
The U.S. patent attorney's file was clean. There was nothing in it other than the patent. They destroyed it as part of their policy. … I mean, what was the- But the court said, we don't reach these issues, period. That was it. The court did not say it was moot.
31 min of audioOral argument — Barber v. . G.J. Partners
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012
And the blade that was used to clean off the parking lot, I presume, is flat, like they, I mean, I think common sense are. Yes. Why isn't Council right? … Is the duty higher if it's next to the entrance, or is there a duty, period? Does it make any difference that the gas station had cones, which they filled to use?
34 min of audioOral argument — Rabinowitz v. Paul Revere
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2004
It doesn't say that they have to act. But I think Judge Wardle's question is, why do we have to declare any part of the policy invalid? Why? … He was in and out for a period of time. He was paid during that time period. But what has happened is that that treatment was good for a while.
56 min of audioOral argument — MillerCoors LLC v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2019
And the court acted with respect to some and didn't act with respect to others. … If I could just add a couple of comments on that point, it would be helpful if you all would address Section 3921.2 of Wright and Miller, which talks about this in some detail.
45 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2019
Congress set forth two distinct acts. The first act was to promulgate, after notice and comment, with different language, the parameters for data collection. … No, but if it adopted a time period where everyone knew, and it's notice and comment. Everyone's told the secretary, don't do a five-day time period.
56 min of audioOral argument — Gary B v. Gretchen Whitmer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2019
We should not have substitutes for long periods of time. … I'm struggling with the idea that 20 years of moving in and out and taking and exercising control, sometimes by public acts that referendums took away and then new public acts were replaced, and they enabled
50 min of audioOral argument — Ortiz v. The City of New York
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2021
And after the first, she made the following comment, which I think drives this discussion. She said, you know, she's calculating the time. … The court here acted well within its broad discretion in applying the relevant legal standards and conducted the case-specific analysis.
37 min of audioOral argument — GW Acquisition Co., LLC v. Pageland Limited Liability Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2025
Brower's own acts and deeds show that the exclusivity provision was of no moment to him. … It's not something that could be acted upon. But Your Honors don't even need to consider that, because Mr.
39 min of audioOral argument — People v. Macedo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2023
This is not a case where the trial court said, I'm going to keep this witness clean. I'm not going to allow any impeachment of him. … Counsel's response is that it was only his thoughts, he never acted on those thoughts. There's no proof that he ever acted on them. Well, the State never had a chance to cross-examine him on that.
47 min of audioOral argument — Memphis A Phillip Randolph Institute v. Tre Hargett
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2020
And on the merits, you cannot find that the district court plainly aired clear abuses discretion or clearly aired. … Indeed, they were required after this injunction to provide identification through the mail as the Help America Vote Act requires.
38 min of audioOral argument — Jespersen v. Colony Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023
I think the only way that that would happen is sort of the Mooney case in New Hampshire where the insurance company goes after the insured who acts fraudulently or acts in some way, and they would be recovering … If I can just have one other comment here.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kevin Shibilski
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2024
They can't even get close to getting around plain air on that. … Judge Peterson's jaw dropped, and he makes the comment, you know, no reasonable person sitting in this courtroom would have believed that this man accepted responsibility.
33 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.