Documents

Oral argument — Honeywell International v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2009

Also, assuming the Secrecy Act, we were to agree with you on the Secrecy Act issue. Damages have already been tried on the case, but the court would then have to put the record down. … Honeywell's counsel made a comment that this was a life or death matter. The committee made a decision. The testimony is unequivocal.

Oral argument — Fisher v. Rozumetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2011

At worst, it would be under the plein air standard of review. … I'm just, I mean, what I'm telling you is in 2007 this wasn't a futile act. This was a live action, something they could have dealt with.

Oral argument — Holmes v. Addison Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2016

He ricocheted off the back of those vehicles, caroled into the other lane, and hit my client head-on, tremendous physical injuries, hospitalized in Chicago for a long period of time, medical bills over … You, as Anderson trusts, a corporation can only act through its people.

Oral argument — David Pulphus v. Stephen T. Ayers, in his official capacity as Architect of the Capitol

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2018

No, because the member is acting, well, for two reasons. … And frankly, many of the points I would have brought to the panel's attention have already been well aired during the first half of this argument, and I won't reiterate them here.

Oral argument — Luis Rosas-Castaneda v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

Your position is that he was losing, pure and simple, based upon what was before the IJ, because he didn't meet the burden of proof as to anything that was up in the air, that was solicitation of any kind … The BIA did not comment on it. And when you look at the documents themselves, what you have is what Sandoval Lua identified as being a classically ambiguous charge.

Oral argument — People v. Gibbs

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016

So at that point, we knew, we took this three-week period to prove it. I mean, what difference would it be if you brought her in than the stipulated evidence that was brought in? … Instead, it seemed that both men had come in with essentially clean records except for the stipulation, and that is an inaccurate picture of what happened here.

Oral argument — Alissa's Flowers, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2021

And then, of course, the rules that this procedure exists to allow grievances to be aired include references to premiums and policies and rates used to calculate those. … it's important for the director who has all of the things to care about, like are the insurance companies going to be solvent, are the premiums too low, are the premiums too high, who's obligated to act

Oral argument — Priceplay.com, Inc. v. AOL Advertising, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2016

And the air of the trial court here was in two parts, two related parts. … There's a fixed period of time within which they have to ask to act. Yes. No, that's all right. It doesn't matter. We can find out. The decision not to institute came in May of 2015.

Oral argument — Montye Benjamin v. Lynn Thomas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2018

We have to look at what the officer thought at that time period. Now, what the officer thought at that time period would have to be reflected in that video, the video which is missing. … Javis's hands are up in the air screaming, You all see what they're trying to do to me. This appears in both of our briefs. You all see what they're trying to do to me. His hands are up.

Oral argument — United States v. Mendoza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2026

In almost all child cases involving this type of material, the individual, the minor, is actually harmed by the mere process of making the images because they're involved in the sexually explicit acts. … There's a 90-day time period, but Dolan says that that's not a binding time period.

Oral argument — State of Delaware v. STB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2017

Why would the one that bars idling period directly pertain and the one that you have does not directly? … If that were true, we started off by asking whether a law that just bars idling, period, would be categorically preempted.

Oral argument — United States v. The Wilderness Socie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2008

Those include FLIPMA, the Quiet Title Act, and other laws. … And I'm going to assume that they were done pursuant to federal environmental law with Clean Water Act Review, Endangered Species Act Review. Are you saying that the road is a done deal?

Oral argument — Vicars-Duncan v. Tactikos

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2014

I think if we looked at the comments that were made by Mr. … Everybody knows people are airing their gripes there. And I still go back to what Judge Little says.

Oral argument — Zachary v. Southwest Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2008

And that's a survey that they did of their members following the air crash that led to the litigation in which these documents were filed. … It would hardly be an idle act, as Appellant has argued, to issue an order telling the district court, look, you need to do a little bit more here.

Oral argument — Bullard v. IndyMac

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 23, 2013

He's not a debtor, period, if you believe Mr. Frank. And you don't need any further proof than me telling you this, but you can read Mr. Frank's brief. … And Judge Steeve wasn't talking about clean hands, unclean hands. If there's unclean hands, the lender here violated the automatic stay. It sued Mrs.

Oral argument — Richard Bays v. Warden Chillicothe Correction

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019

The officers testify he was not acting nervous. He was acting calm. He is in his mid-20s. It was a short interview. He was not deprived of any food or water. … If I can just ask you, did Bay's offer the comments about the victim's wallet?

Oral argument — MCP No 185 Open Internet Rule FCC 24-52 v

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2024

The waves, yes, the waves, the in the air stuff. I think that's right. … This is a communications act. These are fundamental definitions in the Communications Act.

Oral argument — Kern County Farm v. Allen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2006

They closed the comment period in the face of this kind of uncertainty. That's a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. … There was plenty of opportunity to reopen the comment period.

Oral argument — United States v. Lendell Beacham

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2014

So there was not a clean break. There were a lot of straw purchasers that these defendants had in common. … Do you have a response to that case or want to comment at all? I do not know that case because he has not filed a 28-J letter on it, so I have not had a chance to look at it.

Oral argument — Phyllis Moreland-Richardson v. City of Snellville, Georgia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2021

I mean, whether or not the person who made the comment knew how many black employees there were in the city government has nothing to do with whether or not the comment reflects racism on the... whether … the response to the comment reflects racism on the part of her employer, does it?