Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.33s
Oral argument — U.S. Department of Labor v. Tampa Electric Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2022
A decision is made to clean it up or to have an emergency response. … And in Judge Karn's hypothetical, the release is controlled for a period of time, and then all hell breaks loose. But that's how the plant was designed to work.
41 min of audioOral argument — In re Estate of of Bates
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2014
Clean, showering, clean clothes weren't crisp. They were clean overall. They weren't even cared about. Back in 2000, she described him as having slick clothing. … Number one, comments about her character.
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Vega
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2022
I think that goes to the point that Judge Hardiman has raised because you're here in plain air. Is it clear and obvious? Nobody's quite sure on this question. … Cocaine isomers was in the 1984 Criminal Justice Act. So by 1985, New Jersey was regulating it. And that language is cocaine isomers, optical and geometric.
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jeremy Clouse
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2019
Can't all of this just be cleaned up a little later? Does this have to go back now? … They're they're simply they're simply commenting on on evidence that the probation office found.
26 min of audioOral argument — United States v. CLINE
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2007
And I think that you were trying to have a clean trial. I mean, I grant you that. And it's admirable. … So, again, it provides that additional time period that's necessary in order to ensure that you do have a clean trial.
46 min of audioOral argument — Rodriguez v. Barnhart
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2008
He didn't say, I can't clean my house because I have such severe back pain. … The fact that he can clean his house doesn't mean that he can clean his house every day over an eight-hour period.
19 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Southern Coal Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022
Your Honor, that's, and piggybacking off of what Judge Rushing's comment was, and that is correct, but there is a very big distinction between a violation of an NPDES permit and the Clean Water Act. … So those are two different things under the Clean Water Act. They are different things under the Clean Water Act.
38 min of audioOral argument — Female Port Authority Officer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2019
The other two did not come clean? The district court actually said that small, if the theory came clean, was actually after his interviews ended when he was actually given a fourth interview. Ms. … So the head of the investigation, who Dunn and Degner relied on, has been found to make what we say discriminatory comments, intentional comments to females.
21 min of audioOral argument — Mingo Logan Coal Company v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2016
Water Act. … And, in fact, the court specifically distinguished another part of the Clean Air Act that talked about adverse effects on the environment.
50 min of audioOral argument — POET Biorefining, LLC v. EPA and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2020
air act title five permit process in which, which is an exercise of cooperative federalism, where the, the actual regulating parties are the state permitting authorities and in national mining, as in … And as such is not subject to notice and comment.
64 min of audioOral argument — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Serv.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2018
So, you could have, for mammals, situations where they need air and they can't be submerged in a swamp. So, this land will have the air, but it's a big swamp. But maybe we'll drain it. … I can tell you that whenever you go for a Clean Water Act permit, it doesn't have to be no critical habitat need be involved.
61 min of audioOral argument — Hollyfrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. Renewable Fuels Assn.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2021
Keisler, you and the respondents have different accounts of the purpose of the Act, but it's always difficult to interpret an Act in light of its purposes, because Acts serve multiple purposes. … The second is, in the same way Congress used extension in the rest of Section 211, all throughout the Clean Air Act, when it uses extension, it does prolong continuously the duration of something preexisting
99 min of audioOral argument — Denny v. Harrisburg Medical Center, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2010
The natural accumulation on the fourth floor of a hospital, that is a ridiculous decision and a ridiculous extension of the act. … If an employee were injured, that employee would have protection under the Workers' Compensation Act.
27 min of audioOral argument — City of Kennett, MO v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2018
It turns on what the Missouri requirements are for the public comment period, which is different than the petition for review because we cannot challenge this in state court. … But this is a substantive rights case where they're saying, no, that doesn't comply with the Clean Water Act's standards.
31 min of audioOral argument — Thomas v. Tice
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2019
Similarly, the the clean X-ray at J.A. 162 and J.A. 314, J.A. 162. My client testified to having been told by staff that he had had a clean X-ray. … But the X-ray had been clean.
63 min of audioOral argument — Michelle Barnes v. USDOT
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2011
The agency quotes in its response to the comments, In addition, as noted in the response to comment MB-11, that's Michelle Barnes' comments, the proposed runway would reduce air pollution and would also … Again, the issue of these thresholds of significance under the National Environmental Policy Act have been responded to by the agency in their response to comments.
46 min of audioOral argument — Shannan Wheeler v. Arkema Incorporated
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2020
And if they think it's theirs, they clean it up. … That's an air dispersion model, not an air disposition model. It's about where the particles were in the air, not where they would have fallen on the ground.
43 min of audioOral argument — State of Louisiana v. DOE
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023
That's in reference to a comment raised by some of the joint commenters. So that's what's going on here. … your dishes or clean your clothes.
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Texas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2016
One is what the court said is that under the Clean Air Act that Congress had charged the EPA with protecting states and others from the effects of air pollution and then given a specific cause of action … In addition, as General Verrilli has indicated, there was a procedural right within the Clean Air Act that does not exist here.
92 min of audioOral argument — Sierra Club v. West Virginia DEP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022
But the Clean Water Act, as this court has held, is a strict liability statute. … There is no substantial compliance doctrine under the Clean Water Act.
50 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.