Documents

Oral argument — Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2012

So you're referring to the accident reports, but isn't it true that that spans a pretty big time period, right? It spans a period of 30 years. … Would you comment on that? Yes, I believe that 152 is a recodification of 148. I think they just designated it differently, but it's the same act. Right. Yes, sir.

Oral argument — Chavarriaga v. State of NJ Department of Correctios

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2015

She was paraded naked before others who made comments about her. And I could go on and on. … The New Jersey Civil Rights Act pretty much restates what the federal statute talks about in Title 42, Section 1983.

Oral argument — USAv.Sed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

Do you want to comment on that? … They did not act in any way as if they were believe they were in Ohio. So there is no flagrant violation of Ohio law.

Oral argument — United States v. Calderon-Minchola

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The district court commented about the defendant's criminal record. It's an individual with four convictions. … I don't know exactly that period of time. So for the immigration, he'd been in jail for at least two and a half years.

Oral argument — CMRD.N.Corpv.Cityof Phila

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2012

And further, in the way – Well, that sounds like you waited too long, period. … He knew what was in the act. They didn't know what was in the act. You mean you're saying they didn't realize what it was doing? That's what Councilman DiCicco told me. He didn't know the act.

Oral argument — Williams v. Globus Medical

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

I've only looked during the relevant class period, Your Honor, but I believe it does appear. And that continues to be a risk, frankly, into the future. It is a risk. … Could you comment about Scienter a bit? Was that pled with the requisite particularity?

Oral argument — In Re Honorable Leon AKendall

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2012

They might have taken him off the wheel for a period of time, taken his pencils away from him, so to speak. They could. … And more importantly, his comments are with respect to the conduct of his peers.

Oral argument — United States v. Julien Giraud Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2025

Periods of time under B1A? Well, absolutely. But not just that. I mean, any temporal requirement. … And she gets a new 200-day period measured from July 24th. Let me ask you a question on 3345B1 – B1, capital B, okay?

Oral argument — United States v. Apple MacPro Computer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2016

He says the court has gone a little bit apart from what commentators had been saying. Commentators had been saying it just communicates authenticity. … Well, Your Honor, we don't have access to the full record, so I can't comment directly on that.

Oral argument — VI Conservation Society v. VI Board Land Use Appeals

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2020

I believe I did in the brief, your honor, where I think I party under the Coastal Zone Management Act because it had appeared at the initial Coastal Zone Management hearing and also submitted written comments … And if the permit is deemed approved but did not comply with the Organic Act, you cannot very well apply a condition that says you must comply with the Organic Act.

Oral argument — Fulton v. City of Philadelphia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2018

In connection with the comments that were made by Commissioner Figueroa, what's your response to – you should act more like Pope Francis, sort of. … We haven't heard anything about the Pennsylvania Act. Any comment that you would like to make about that? I'm sorry, District, about the regulations? Yes. The RFPA. The RFPA.

Oral argument — Jackson v. Danberg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 22, 2009

I don't think it would be presumptuous of me to say that if we do let you go ahead, if there's any message that you bring back to the people is it's time to get your act together, okay? … Where I said somewhat, that was not a helpful comment. And I guess I'm just feeling frustrated because. It's a serious matter. Yeah, and I keep hearing about, you know, the new protocol.

Oral argument — Canterbury Coal Cov.Director OWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2012

But since that time, I also want to say we've had amendments to the Black Lung Act. But we're dealing with what's in front of us, right? Correct. And what the ALJ did. Right. … There is no congressional authority to do this, period. There is no legislative history to file a subsequent claim. That's right. There is no legislative history to support it, period.

Oral argument — In Re Semcrude L P

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

What the facts are, there were 11 million barrels of oil sold in that period. Only 3 million of those barrels came from the so-called first purchasers. … What about comment 7? What about the comment, I think it's comment 7 in 920.

Oral argument — INREMessina

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

And the 30-day objecting period only applies if there was a valid exemption. Yes. Yes. … And it was on my advice that he acted to file the adversary proceeding.

Oral argument — Micken-Thomasv.Pa Boardof Probation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011

He acted inappropriately. He acted sarcastically. We dismissed him from the program. So his high-risk behavior, A, doesn't exist, number one. … And then there's a two-line comment by Senator Gaddy that's following the request to somebody else. And then in the very right-hand, I guess the person who referred to it, Miranda says, Mr.

Oral argument — Zelenka v. NFIIndustries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

False Claims Act. … And I'm not here to comment on that.

Oral argument — Certain Underwriters v. UPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2014

So your friend's only shot is bringing a Carmack Act claim, right? That is UPS's position, correct. … What do we make of the Fifth Circuit's comment in the Transportation Enterprises case? That's a 2010 case, right? Or Tran Enterprises? Tran.

Oral argument — Davis v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2023

So that really addresses an interregnum period. … They're not matters that should be addressed through offhand comments or arguments in brief made by lawyers. And fair enough, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Fellner v. Tri Union Seafoods

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

This letter, in our case, purports to be interpreting Section 403 of the Act and says that you can't comply with both conflict preemption. Okay. … Did you mean to leave me with the impression that the answer to my question was Section 403 of the Act? No, I go to the general authorizing.