Documents

Oral argument — Woods View II LLC v. Kitsap County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2012

In fact, the county is entitled to act as a provider of comments and opinions to another entity such as the Department of Health. This court has so held that it applies to local governments. … It is not a violation of due process for someone to send a comment.

Oral argument — United States v. Mitola

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

During that period of time, prior to Perry Adrian going to work for the FBI, he and my client spent a lot of time together. During that period of time, Perry Adrian asked my client for a gun. … Mottola had approached him on three separate occasions asking not only for a gun, but a clean gun. And he also told Mr. Moss that he was a gun collector.

Oral argument — Brian Dawe v. Corrections USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2012

Harkins confirmed that did come within the one-year period. … As to DAW, all of the communications were within the one-year period. Let me ask you a question.

Oral argument — Dorothy Peralta v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2010

Just a month and a half ago, Justice Breyer said in the Hertz case that jurisdictional rules are strongest if there is a clean, simple application. And that's clean and simple. … If you go back to the act of 1887, you'll see that. And so it said located, and it said, in using the word located, it said, therefore, we're going to treat national banks like individual citizens.

Oral argument — Taybron v. CityCounty of SF

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2003

It was more comments that she made. You mean disaggregated. … Who was cleaning what bus, who was doing what work. They didn't complain that Mr. O'Brien had said to me X, Y, Z. So what did Cardwell respond to all of that?

Oral argument — Mark Candler v. Santa Rita Cty Jail Watch Cmdr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2019

That was the Bail Reform Act. That was a non-disciplinary law that would result in detention for non-disciplinary reasons. … But the law library, the exercise, the access to cleaning supplies, the shower, all of that within the period of time that he's allowed out of his cell. Correct.

Oral argument — National Federation of the Bli v. United Airlines Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2012

So we're going to, you know, Congress came together and passed the Air Carrier Access Act, which, again, has its origins in the Rehab Act. … Well, the Air Carrier Access Act provision itself, when you look at it in its totality, it does several things.

Oral argument — Guadalupe Salazar v. McDonald's Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2018

So they're going to send an inspector around from time to time who's going to go to the bathroom, see if it's clean. And if it's not clean, well, then what's he going to do? … Because there's no common law right to a particular meal period or rest period. That's right. Any time period. That's right. And in your hypothetical, I agree.

Oral argument — Denhe v. Bart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2007

And that's a very important issue in this case, because he's mad about Denae's comments at the podium when he says you're acting as a czar when you introduce these new rules here. … Diné during the period of time that he was making these really derogatory comments. It's only once he returned to the audience and spoke out of turn that any action was actually taken against him.

Oral argument — Eliseo German v. Robert Horel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2012

There were – the frolicking detour comment comes from the Morales case, the 2003 California Court of Appeal case. They coined that term, frolicking detour. … It found there were competing inferences between whether the gang members acted as family members because they were related to each other or whether they acted as gang members.

Oral argument — United States v. Joseph Robertson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2017

So he knew that his activity was illegal and he was properly convicted of a Clean Water Act violation and of willful injury to United States property. Counsel, let me ask you a question. … He was told over and over with respect to these violations, that they violated the Clean Water Act. And in the District Court's words, he went ahead and did what he wanted to do anyway.

Oral argument — David Zindel v. Fox Searchlight Pictures

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2019

When you take a film and you compare it to a piece of paper, you have to imagine, you have to imagine what the audience feels when it's acted out. … It skips back and forth between periods of time. It skips back and forth between different settings.

Oral argument — United States v. Corona

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2009

But it's also a plein air issue. … So Fuchs is a plein air case, which we think is on all fours with our case. If here they allege overt acts both within the six-year statute of limitation and without it. Yes.

Oral argument — United States v. Joe Nersesyan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2019

The third-hand comment in the pre-sentence report, if you read it very carefully, and I'm suggesting you need to read it very carefully in this case, is that Mr. … It's going to be over a period of time, right? Correct, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Moreland Properties LLC v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2025

Didn't clean it up. So, you know, that I think that piece seems unassailable. OK, we disagree with that for this reason, Your Honor. … And I'm sorry, on a limitations period. Yes. Yes. What what what is your burden on that?

Oral argument — Naleen Andrade v. Darren Cho

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2022

My name is Elaine Chow, and today I will address four reasons why the district court aired below. First, the district court aired in dismissing Dr. Andrade's 1983 claims in three ways. … You're about to talk about statements or comments outside the record.

Oral argument — Dagostino v. Budge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2005

Because at the time of the trial, she had prostitution charges pending that were then cleaned up after the trial. She had battery charges pending that were then cleaned up after the trial. … She had a grand larceny charge that was under negotiation that was cleaned up. She had trespassing pending that was cleaned up after the trial.

Oral argument — Orange County Dept. of Educ. v. California Dept. of Educ.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2010

So who was acting as parent? Who was acting as his parent? … Just a couple of brief comments.

Oral argument — Aracely Marinelarena v. Loretta E. Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2016

You no longer start with a clean slate and say what is it you were convicted of. Moncrief says we start with a presumption that a conviction rests on the least of the acts criminalized and then... … Let me see if Judge DeShima or Judge Grieber have any comments. Thank you very much, Ms. Marin. The case just argued is submitted.

Oral argument — Twardowski v. American Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2008

That is the direction being equivalent to a request and then the noncompliance with that request being an act of commission, if you will, under come on, if you want to use the act and omission rubric, … I am in full agreement with the comments that Mr. Chisholm has made to the Court. I'm rather surprised at some of the comments I heard from Mr.