Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Walter Reed

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

There they declined to construe the statute with regard to official act and said we're going to not let the government set the standard for good government for state and local officials. … And the crimes took place over the same time period.

Oral argument — Chad Wilson v. City of Southlake

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2019

of 1973 or the Disabilities Act. … I'm not talking about the act of handcuffing himself. I'm saying once he's handcuffed, is the comment necessary and reasonable?

Oral argument — United States v. Sealed Juvenile

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015

He, he, he can't loiter, but I think the, the common understanding of that is he can't be somewhere for any extended period of time. … Then there's a period of step-down.

Oral argument — Sterling v. City of Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2026

Does the second circuit pair of cases help you or hurt you because one way of interpreting what officials were saying about 9-11 air pollution was we need to encourage them to speak they just didn't know … So let me pick up if I may with the last point which is the rational basis for how the city acted.

Oral argument — Malcolm Kelso v. Christine Butler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015

The only comment that the district judge made, that Judge Walter made, was that the fellow that was presenting this, Mr. … to show that he was acting in his capacity as an individual.

Oral argument — United States v. Thomas Sanders

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

Should act as a safety net in this context. I'm just responding. … Sanders had truly been incompetent before this period, defense counsel would have raised this much earlier.

Oral argument — Wilson v. Baucom

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2023

There was actually a judicial finding against him for that comment that he made, that he wished he had a rope for him acting that way. And so these are things that... … I have a very short period of time so I'm going to address only a few of the points that I have.

Oral argument — Marquita Higgins v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2015

The comments took place over a couple periods of time. One was in January of 2012, and it's true, at that point, Mr. Red was a coworker. … That's when he made comments about never having been with a black woman, putting his private he was going to lick, lick, lick her from her head to her toe.

Oral argument — Timothy White v. Regional Adjustment Bur, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2015

Myers in trouble as well, is I didn't do anything wrong, period. Period. … The cases didn't go well, but he did not act in that faith.

Oral argument — State of Texas v. NRC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2022

Texas filed comments in the agency proceedings that is more than adequate to confer party grief status under the Hobbs Act. … There's no dispute that Texas has, as has FASCN, filed comments vis-à-vis the draft Environmental Impact Statement.

Oral argument — United States v. Harry Berry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2016

The evidence should not be suppressed in this case because the officers acted in reasonable reliance on circuit precedent. … And I think that they misinterpret this court's opinion, because this court's opinion in Hernandez ends with the comment, We do not decide that case today. That's how Hernandez ends.

Oral argument — Bell v. Lutnick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 22, 2025

And it started out as a periodic advisory body established by HHS. … I believe there was a response on that comment.

Oral argument — Susan Ruscher v. Omnicare, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2016

Can you comment on that? That's a fair question. … So Omnicare, during this time period, and if you look at the Templin case, even before the relevant time period, was aware that they had to comply with the False Claims Act and the anti-kickback statute

Oral argument — William Canada, Jr. v. USA (IRS)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2020

Canada is raising is whether the government employees were acting in a discretionary capacity. … With respect to the comment that until the IRS assessed these penalties and filed their claim in the bankruptcy case, Mr.

Oral argument — Directv Holdings, L.L.C. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2016

During that short period of time, he had nine previous incidents where he had been disciplined. … Edmonds, but not the full comment.

Oral argument — Diageo North America, Inc. v. Mexcor, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2016

And it is equally clear from the Fifth Circuit's ruling in layered against air carrier engine services in 1959. … This was a progressive encroachment, and my client acted diligently once their true intent was known.

Oral argument — State of Texas v. USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2015

So first of all, we would say that that is a purely legal disagreement, which can be fully aired out in amicus briefs, and this Court has said that generally speaking intervention is not appropriate when … There was no intentional act to issue these longer-term documents after the injunction. Again, the government informed the court, and the court is continuing to address those questions.

Oral argument — Delbert Johnson v. City of Fort Worth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018

The plaintiff is Delbert Johnson, an African Apollo sergeant of his who committed certain acts against him. He does not implicate Chief Halstead in that conduct. … And then we have Sergeant Stamp making a comment to himself or somebody that . . .

Oral argument — Wages and White Lion Invest v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2026

It is, it seems to be different on the Tobacco Control Act, a specific requirement to use rulemaking notice and comment in certain circumstances, so it seems to me the issue is, is any of this, which the … Of course, the reason that a million of these applications were denied within a short period of time is that none of them knew that they had to have this comparison to show the demonstration of appropriateness

Oral argument — King v. King

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2023

This is a preemptive period, not a prescriptive period. The statute is very clear it is preemptive. … The statute also is very clear that it says the preemptive period of three years begins to run from an accounting in which the act or omission is rendered.