Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
6.23s
Federal Register · Rule · May 24, 2012
The public comment period for these actions closed on December 5, 2011, and we did not receive any comments. II. What final action is EPA taking? … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
77 FR 30900Environmental Protection AgencyNotification of a Public Teleconference of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 6, 2013
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409D(d)(2), to provide advice, information, and recommendations to … Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA requires that the Agency periodically review and revise, as appropriate, the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants, including lead.
78 FR 14538Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Regional Haze 5-Year Report
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 19, 2016
New Hampshire's SIP revision addresses requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require states to submit periodic reports describing progress toward reasonable progress goals (RPGs) … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
81 FR 46866Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 21, 1998
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the South … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
63 FR 44792Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Revisions; California; Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 30, 2023
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. … Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit
88 FR 42248Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface Coating of Metal Furniture
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 24, 2002
These proposed standards would implement section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) by requiring these operations to meet HAP emission standards reflecting the application of the maximum achievable control … The semiannual compliance reporting requirements may be satisfied by reports required under other parts of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
67 FR 20206Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 22, 1999
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … Air Act.
64 FR 71660Environmental Protection AgencyFinding of Attainment for PM-10; Shoshone County (City of Pinehurst and Pinehurst Expansion Area)
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 23, 2001
law and classified “moderate” upon enactment of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. … the state and the Federal government established in the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 44304Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 8, 2007
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received comments from Jennifer L. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 25971Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 2, 2021
Three public comments were received on the NPRM. II. Response to Comments EPA received three comments during the comment period. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
86 FR 29520Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Alaska: Regional Haze Progress Report
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 2018
The public comment period for the proposal ended March 19, 2018. We received no adverse comments. 1 1 We received two comments in support of the proposed approval. … Statutory and Executive Orders Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable federal regulations
83 FR 15746Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation of Authority to Louisiana
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 17, 2006
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. B. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 19652Environmental Protection AgencyDesignation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 26, 1997
As a result of these exceedances, and pursuant to section 107(d)(A)(B) of the Clean Air Act (Act), a portion of Clinton Township in Vermillion County was designated moderate nonattainment for PM-10 on … The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act. PART 81--[AMENDED] 1.
62 FR 45168Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 13, 1999
The intended effect of this action is to bring the AVAPCD SIP up to date in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 2141Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Mar 12, 2010
• Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. … Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator identifies and lists certain pollutants which “cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public
75 FR 11877Environmental Protection AgencyStandards for Birds Not Bred for Use in Research Under the Animal Welfare Act
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 21, 2023
In response to commenter requests, we extended the comment period for 30 days to May 25, 2022. … During the comment period, APHIS received no requests for consultation or comment from Tribal nations.
88 FR 10654Agriculture DepartmentAnimal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 2, 2000
Air Act. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
65 FR 47336Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 28, 2004
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 77645Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 20, 2007
We are proposing to approve a local rule regulating these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 65283Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 7, 2003
EPA is proposing to approve these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 24363Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.