Documents

Oral argument — Edward Weinhaus v. Regina Scannicchio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2025

May it please the Court, this report aired when it concluded it was unable to exercise original jurisdiction over Mr. … If she was, though, if she did have jurisdiction at the time the comments were made, would you have a judicial immunity problem? I haven't briefed that issue, Your Honor. I'd have to look into it.

Oral argument — Citizens for Balanced Use v. Kathleen McAllister

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

Summarize for me, if you can, why that was air, what the district court did, and as concisely as possible. … Citizens believes that the integrity of NEPA was compromised in this case when the Forest Service didn't adequately address their concerns as communicated in their comments and those of Dr.

Oral argument — Robert Donnert v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2015

Well, if I could address the district court not buying it comment, I believe the district court judge was buying it. … Wouldn't you have the bills for the hay and the tending and the serving, paying the salaries of people who rush and clean the horses and so forth?

Oral argument — Devillier v. Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2024

But the interim period is endemic to litigation, due process violation, being held on an indictment. But that is the proper remedy, and that's the remedy that existed until the Tucker Act was passed. … McClung's Lessee, where the court ejected the United States military from its own base because it didn't have clean title.

Oral argument — First Mid-Illinois Bank & Trust v. Parker

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2010

No, we're writing on a clean slate, so to speak. The third element of statutory interpretation I'd like the court to consider is the purpose of these two statutes. … And it's a little bit obscure unless you look into some of the comments in the LLC Act.

Oral argument — SW Airlines Pilots Assn v. SW Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2024

If they can do this to Roebling, one of 30 of the elite standards check air, I always call them check airmen, it's changed to check pilots, standards check pilots. … It was actually a comment on the picture of the shoes, which someone else said a derogatory thing about. And it was a further comment about what the shoes looked like to Captain Roebling.

Oral argument — Boechler v. Interior

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2010

Was this just a comment to some politicians passing through that too much money was being spent, which seems to me to be typical and ordinary? Or was it a more serious whistleblowing? … How much does the grand jury indictment wipe clean the charges Mr. Thompson is making about activities before the indictment? I'm not sure I understand, Your Honor. The charges of whistleblowing?

Oral argument — Balcazar v. Advocate Health and Hospitals

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2018

It can't be you can't pull it out of thin air. It's got to continue through the rest of the complaints, right? … If it was an access period, it would be recorded.

Oral argument — Regatta Bay Limited v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2013

So, for example, if a Sergeant plows through a stop sign at Nellis, the Air Force will be held to the same standard as if it had been a private citizen someplace else in Las Vegas. … So a voluntary act of the victim falls in between the actions of HUD and the resulting loss.

Oral argument — United States v. Varnell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2021

But that version that they relied on wasn't just picked out of thin air. That was reports in a court proceeding, was it not? … Wasn't it also clear that he was on medication that was working during this time period? Well, he was on medication, Your Honor.

Oral argument — David Brown v. State of Hawaii

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2011

If you want to go out elsewhere and air your dirty laundry elsewhere as a citizen, you know, like in Freytag. That's not the hypothetical. … He had a lot of comments. The district judge never got to that point because the district judge said because of how he was situated, he couldn't get an injunction.

Oral argument — United States v. ZARAGOZA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2006

I believe His Honor has announced he's going to retire, but I have recently heard last week that that's a little bit up in the air right now. So under U.S. v. … And only on known expenditures, the FBI forensic accountant determined that during the time period of 1995 to 2000, Ms.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Arkin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2018

He died during that period of time until the judge ruled upon it. … He throws all his money away and throws his hands up in the air and says, I'm poor. I think if there was ever a case that defined unclean hands, this is it.

Oral argument — United States v. Joe May

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2024

Yes, because count 40 says in and around February of 2016, i.e. the concealment period, in 2015 the mail fraud count relates to 2015 when drugs are actually shipped and this lines up squarely with O'Lear … And also, before you begin, and before I forget to do so, court wishes to express its thanks for your services in the case under the Criminal Justice Act. Thank you, Your Honor. I appreciate that.

Oral argument — United States v. Harinder Singh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2020

And here, you know, he really was a courier for most of the period during which this scheme was taking place. … And just to pull them out of thin air, which I think would pull them out of thin air.

Oral argument — United States v. Miguel Cano

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

So it was less than a year-long period that he was requesting information for. And this was information that the government had knowledge of. So I'll start off with the Latin King's. … There's no more contraband coming in, but they find air. Well, how would you, how would, how would we know that there was no more contraband coming in?

Oral argument — Jenny Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2015

And finally, with respect to Gates, the only comment I would make about Gates is that the issue as provided in this section regardless of just wasn't litigated by the parties, it wasn't brought to the … That's a very good point. 1610G is ambiguous, and there's no way to get a clean reading of it. There's surplufility. That's a word. No matter how you read it, it says any property.

Oral argument — MKB Constructors v. American Zurich Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2017

How much, over what period of time? Well, that's somewhat of a guess that the geotechnical consultant for the school district estimated. … And in Toll, they said it's okay for the judge and not the jury to decide the award of penalties under the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Charles Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016

dig down here, because I can imagine in my mind somebody saying, cumulative exposure matters, and this person was working in an environment where so many parts per million of fibers were in the ambient air … He didn't make that comment, and he didn't know about it. So he was troubled. And it wasn't a standard case. It wasn't a standard scenario, certainly.

Oral argument — United States v. Charles Bolton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018

She said—she was talking about the testimony of the Air National Guard sergeant who didn't know what a capital contribution was, and she said he said he didn't know he would have to look it up, you know … Were there affirmative acts? Cashing checks is not illegal. Deceptive tax records. Agent Luker at 2580 said that Charles Bolton didn't have deceptive tax records. What about the false statements?