Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.77s
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 27, 2002
The EPA is finalizing approval of these 2 SIP revisions to regulate emissions of NO X as meeting the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act). … We received written comments from the Baton Rouge Clean Air Coalition (BRCAC), M. D.
67 FR 60877Environmental Protection AgencyOpen Market Trading Rule for Ozone Smog Precursors
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 3, 1995
Air Act (Act) and existing EPA rules and policies. … Option 3: Splitting Regulatory Liability Between User and Generator Other commenters suggested splitting liability for compliance under State laws and the Clean Air Act among the generators and users
60 FR 39668Environmental Protection AgencyOral argument — United States v. Enrique Lizano
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2024
as a standard or limitation on emissions under the Clean Air Act. … of EPA or, excuse me, of Clean Air Act standards and regulations.
43 min of audioNational Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 21, 2005
As required by section 112(d)(6) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA has reviewed the standards and is proposing revisions to take into account new developments in production practices, processes, and control … § 63.322(o) beginning on September 22, 1993 or immediately upon startup, whichever is later, except for dry cleaning systems complying with section 112(i)(2) of the Clean Air Act; and shall be in compliance
70 FR 75884Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 4, 1999
This final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 10389Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Washington
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 11, 2015
Wegman to Air Division Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean Air Act . … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 48033Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 19, 2000
Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
65 FR 62626Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 21, 1997
The intended effect of approving these rules is to implement the transportation conformity provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 62 FR 37172. No comments were received, so no response has been prepared. [[Page 54588]] IV.
62 FR 54587Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 11, 2011
In accordance with section 179(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. section 7509(c)(1), and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 51.1004(c), EPA is determining that the Charleston Area ( … EPA received no comments on this notice of proposed rulemaking. II. What are the effects of these actions?
76 FR 62640Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of Implementation Plans; North Carolina: Clean Air Interstate Rule
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 5, 2007
This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
72 FR 56974Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 12, 1999
the comment period for this action. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 12257Environmental Protection AgencyReview of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 19, 2009
□ Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator identifies and lists certain pollutants which “cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be
74 FR 53498Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 24, 2013
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA). … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received one comment from Harold Peterson of Huntsville, Alabama.
78 FR 58460Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 2, 2011
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to determine pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), that the Rome, Georgia fine particulate (PM 2.5 ) nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as “the Rome Area” or “the … More detailed information on the monitoring data for the Rome Area during the 2007-2009 design period is provided in EPA's April 5, 2011, final rulemaking to approve the clean data determination for the
76 FR 31898Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 2, 2011
This action is being taken under authority of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on December 2, 2011. … The Clean Air Act was enacted by Congress. 42 U.S.C.A. 7401. Under the Act, EPA is authorized to set clean air standards. 42 U.S.C.A. 7409.
76 FR 67600Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 13, 2011
Comment 2: Also under the header “No Clean Air Act Section 110(l) analysis,” the Commenter cites the section 110(l) CAA requirement, and states “Clean Air Act § 110(l) requires `EPA to evaluate whether … Comment 3: Under the header “No Clean Air Act Section 110(l) analysis,” the Commenter states that “We are not required to guess what EPA's Clean Air Act 110(l) analysis would be.
76 FR 41123Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 13, 2011
Comment 2: Also under the header “No Clean Air Act Section 110(l) analysis,” the Commenter cites the section 110(l) CAA requirement, and states “Clean Air Act § 110(l) requires `EPA to evaluate whether … Comment 3: Under the header “No Clean Air Act Section 110(l) analysis,” the Commenter states that “We are not required to guess what EPA's Clean Air Act 110(l) analysis would be.
76 FR 41088Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 13, 2011
Comment 2: Also under the header “No Clean Air Act Section 110(l) analysis,” the Commenter cites the section 110(l) CAA requirement, and states “Clean Air Act § 110(l) requires `EPA to evaluate whether … Comment 3: Under the header “No Clean Air Act Section 110(l) analysis,” the Commenter states that “We are not required to guess what EPA's Clean Air Act 110(l) analysis would be.
76 FR 41111Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 1, 2011
Once reclassified, the State of Maryland must submit State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions for the Baltimore Area to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for serious ozone nonattainment areas. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate
76 FR 54412Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Nebraska
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 30, 2011
In addition, Section 81-1504(4) designates NDEQ as the air pollution control agency for the purposes of the Clean Air Act. … It also authorizes NDEQ to act as the state air pollution control agency for all purposes of the Clean Air Act.
76 FR 17592Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.