Documents

Oral argument — NLRB v. CNN America, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2017

The case that it cited to is Capitol Cleaning, and holds that out as the precedent for you to follow. … As we have argued in our brief, Capitol Cleaning also doesn't apply here, and cannot apply and has never applied in a situation if you agree with our joint employer status.

Oral argument — Scott Schmidt v. Brian Foster

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

He was not able to act as his client's assistant, advocate, counselor. … In Woods, you've accurately described why the absence for a short period of time allegedly didn't impact.

Oral argument — United States v. John Underwood

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2012

to determine whether he acted in good faith. … Yes, because I think what Judge Noonan, I think what you're referring to was some of the comments that were made by the, that related to comments made by the government with regard to rogue officers and

Oral argument — In Re: John McFadden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2016

If we act here, does that keep him from going to state court? No. No, Your Honor. No, it does not. So what does holding an abeyance do? Nothing. … So active incarceration was six if you kept your nose clean and then you got to go home. Well, Your Honor, that's exactly the point, if you kept your nose clean.

Oral argument — The Diocese of Quincy v. The Episcopal Church

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2014

It says, clean up your documents and solidify your relationships before any type of dispute arises. You know, Mr. … They acted. They continued to act. They functioned under the not-for-profit corporation law of the state of Illinois.

Oral argument — Ty Ellington v. Eclipse Recreational Vehicles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2021

have followed phyllis hilda it is not respectfully an outlier it is instead a case i i i understand you're uh you're riding uh that case pretty heavily but i guess my my question and let me try to uh clean … why is he wrong i understand the argument he's making that's that's the spin that he's putting on it the dealership this the defect in this case is a latent frame defect where the frame cracks over a period

Oral argument — Amistad Christiana Church v. City of Las Vegas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2017

You found that the organization is acting in lieu of a traditional state actor, right? It's in historical order. It's a function. … Again, it is the decision by the city to, for this particular period, grant a private entity the right to regulate, not just for the festival.

Oral argument — Luis Rosas-Castaneda v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

Your position is that he was losing, pure and simple, based upon what was before the IJ, because he didn't meet the burden of proof as to anything that was up in the air, that was solicitation of any kind … The BIA did not comment on it. And when you look at the documents themselves, what you have is what Sandoval Lua identified as being a classically ambiguous charge.

Oral argument — Dean Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package System

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2014

What's your comment on the Silk case? Well, Silk was an old case, again, an NLRI case that decided, I think, in the 1930s. … But we know that on a nationwide basis, during the class period between 2000 and 2006, 85 percent of the drivers in the class had a single truck. 3.5 percent had two trucks.

Oral argument — People v. Colbert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2024

And the defendant's comments are at 463 to 464. Trial court's comment is at 493. … So, she did act appropriately. She acted strategically. And she did then present, sorry, she did then present evidence.

Oral argument — Perfect Surgical Techniques v. Olympus America, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

And he sent comments on March 2nd. So we know between receiving it and sending comments, he had to be working on those comments. Yes, Your Honor. … We have no idea whether they were one page or 20 pages long, but we do know that during that period, he produced comments.

Oral argument — Jimmy Haynes v. Waste Connections, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2019

Under Fourth Circuit precedent, Your Honor, the issue in summary judgment is not whether someone did or did not, in fact, do or do not a certain alleged act. … Then the alleged comment about the upcoming performance evaluations, don't worry, you've got nothing to worry about. Noticeably, Mr. Fountain did not say. The slate is now clean, Mr. Haynes.

Oral argument — Bettis v. Marsaglia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2014

And it's not covered under the Administrative Review Act because 1010 doesn't ask that this be saved. This is to be governed under the Administrative Review Act. … This was a school that they cleaned out the library and put some tables and chairs in it. We sat down and they had an electoral board hearing. That was it.

Oral argument — Mickail Myles v. County of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2025

that that wouldn't be like if the if the instruction had added and you can factor this into your damages calculation that would be wrong correct yes all right go ahead please finish I had an anodyne comment … damages I understand the courts the courts understanding of that thank you with my very limited time I would just like to respond to counsel suggestion that argument closing argument was split into a clean

Oral argument — Jason King v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

It says during a six-month period, I'm reading from page 31 of the joint appendix, during the six-month period, the plaintiff was evaluated approximately eight times by dental staff. … One of the things that Iqbal and Twombly say is that they're very tough on even conclusory, on conclusory pleadings, where, in other words, you just can't plead the standard and say he acted or she acted

Oral argument — United States v. James Heaton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2022

It says also, it means that he acted in accordance with what he reasonably believed to be proper. He said he didn't have to prove to you he acted in good faith. … It's all, they clean it out. They just say GDR everybody and we have to go figure it out whether it's harmless there or not. Whether it's been preserved, number one. Whether it's plain there.

Oral argument — Robert Donnert v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2015

Well, if I could address the district court not buying it comment, I believe the district court judge was buying it. … Wouldn't you have the bills for the hay and the tending and the serving, paying the salaries of people who rush and clean the horses and so forth?

Oral argument — Sandholm v. Kuecker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2011

The legislative comments are brief in this, and the debate is brief. But if you look at it, Mr. … And as we point out in our brief with Michigan Avenue National Bank, it's very difficult to claim that an act like this, which makes more difficult but does not wipe the slate clean, leaves the common

Oral argument — United States v. Cascella

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2019

He was not making these remarks out of whole cloth or out of thin air or in the abstract. … And prosecutors get trained by reading First Circuit decisions, and they look at what types of comments result in reversals, what types of comments the court pronounces as being improper.

Oral argument — Devillier v. Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2024

But the interim period is endemic to litigation, due process violation, being held on an indictment. But that is the proper remedy, and that's the remedy that existed until the Tucker Act was passed. … McClung's Lessee, where the court ejected the United States military from its own base because it didn't have clean title.