Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,016 results
0.27s
Oral argument — Securitiesand Exchange Commissionv.Teo,etal
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2013
Is there any way to read what the District Court said as implicitly hitting that causal connection and commenting on it? I don't believe there is, Your Honor. … Your Honor, there is not only no case law that supports that, but it's contrary to the statutory scheme and to the purpose of the Williams Act.
35 min of audioOral argument — Kurns v. AWChesterton Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2010
Markowitz, who will follow me in the podium, may have some additional comments, but let me address it right now. … No period either. Let me begin, since I think I'm here to mop up, to some degree, Mr.
32 min of audioOral argument — NJRetailv.Sidamon-Eristoff
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2011
I mean, this is where it, and if other States start to enact three-year presumptive periods, or three-year abandonment periods, we may get more conflicts than we've had in the past. … , an act that is prohibited by federal law.
59 min of audioOral argument — Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. v. American National Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014
Mitalika's comment that you failed to disclose that you were going to move or move your operations offshore? The record on that is on a couple of different things. … And, you know, in this case, following a lengthy discovery period, Anneko sought summary judgment on its rescission claim.
39 min of audioOral argument — 19-3102_MZM Construction v. NJ Bldg Laborers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020
If she's signing an agreement and actually Judge McNulty notes this specifically in his comments at oral argument, he says, you know, she understands what a collective bargaining agreement is. … And at the end, uh, by, you know, whether it's bad faith, bad faith, or, uh, you know, a surreptitious act, uh, some sort of absurd construction of events.
49 min of audioOral argument — Puleov.Chase Bank USA En Banc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2010
The Federal Arbitration Act determines the allocation of authority between courts and arbitrators in cases that involve an arbitration agreement. … It's not up in the air. Nobody's saying it's ambiguous. It isn't that sort of circumstance at all. There's a clear prohibition.
61 min of audioOral argument — In Re Honorable Leon AKendall
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2012
They might have taken him off the wheel for a period of time, taken his pencils away from him, so to speak. They could. … And more importantly, his comments are with respect to the conduct of his peers.
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Julien Giraud Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2025
Periods of time under B1A? Well, absolutely. But not just that. I mean, any temporal requirement. … And she gets a new 200-day period measured from July 24th. Let me ask you a question on 3345B1 – B1, capital B, okay?
77 min of audioOral argument — Rodriguezv.Faber
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2013
from the date of the REAL ID Act. … Also, in Kokovich, the court actually dismissed the petition because he was outside the 30-day time period. This case falls right under there.
35 min of audioOral argument — Swanger v. Warrior Run School District
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2016
My able colleague came up with a comment to this honorable court that they knew that this young man was involved in targeting, and there's just no evidence of record to support that. … So it's a vastly different circumstance than the LNR case where there were months of molestation alleged in a room where the teacher was present over a long period of time.
33 min of audioOral argument — VI Conservation Society v. VI Board Land Use Appeals
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2020
I believe I did in the brief, your honor, where I think I party under the Coastal Zone Management Act because it had appeared at the initial Coastal Zone Management hearing and also submitted written comments … And if the permit is deemed approved but did not comply with the Organic Act, you cannot very well apply a condition that says you must comply with the Organic Act.
53 min of audioOral argument — Rodriguez v. National City Bank
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2012
Period. Because of concern for absent class members, right? Isn't that what AMCM is all about? … I think the Supreme Court's comment in Wal-Mart that you can come up with questions by the droves as apropos there.
58 min of audioOral argument — Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2017
But out of the 55 decisions, on the 20 decisions, the BIA itself focused whether the leadership sanctioned this act. … You're acting as though the finding by the IJ and the BIA rests solely on the RAB. But it really doesn't. It was broader than that.
54 min of audioOral argument — Dennis v. Sec PA Dept Corrections_En Banc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2015
We can't just pull something out of the air and say, oh, well, we see something that nobody else talked about. … When you said that issue was never waived, are you talking about the Commonwealth's comment in its reply brief? I'm referring to the Commonwealth's comment in its reply brief on the direct appeal.
62 min of audioOral argument — United States v. William Valentin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2023
We understood that Hobbs Act robbery is broader than the comment, excuse me, than the guideline definition because the guideline requires that to be against another person. … The comment says it is a crime of violence if the underlying thing is a crime of violence. It doesn't say the opposite.
52 min of audioOral argument — Jaludi v. Citigroup
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2022
But the logic of a continuing violation is, take a hostile work environment, a classic example, no one individual comment might be actionable. … The only act you've got within this period is the headhunter didn't respond to him. But I don't see a concrete fact that links Citigroup to that headhunter. Well, you're on our time. Yeah, thank you.
41 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Calderon-Minchola
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
The district court commented about the defendant's criminal record. It's an individual with four convictions. … I don't know exactly that period of time. So for the immigration, he'd been in jail for at least two and a half years.
33 min of audioOral argument — G-IHoldings v. Reliance
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
And that's why you get back to the interrelated wrongful acts provision. … I have no comment. But we think in any event, the moose and the snake should be sent back to the District Court. Thank you. Very good. Thanks, General.
32 min of audioOral argument — Davis v. Atty Gen USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2023
So that really addresses an interregnum period. … They're not matters that should be addressed through offhand comments or arguments in brief made by lawyers. And fair enough, Your Honor.
55 min of audioOral argument — City of Cambridge Ret Sys v. Altisource Asset Mgmt
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2018
For example, during appendix at page 655, just two weeks later, the CFPB comments that Auckland violated consumer financial laws at every stage of the mortgaging process. … But that's beyond the end of this class period because the class period ends in January 2015 and the settlement with the New York state authorities was at the end of December 2014.
59 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.